We introduce a corrected sinusoidal-wave drag force method （SDFM） into optical tweezers to calibrate the trapping stiffness of the optical trap and conversion factor （CF） of photodetectors. First, the theoretical ...We introduce a corrected sinusoidal-wave drag force method （SDFM） into optical tweezers to calibrate the trapping stiffness of the optical trap and conversion factor （CF） of photodetectors. First, the theoretical analysis and experimental result demonstrate that the correction of SDFM is necessary, especially the error of no correction is up to 11.25% for a bead of 5μm in diameter. Second, the simulation results demonstrate that the SDFM has a better performance in the calibration of optical tweezers than the triangular-wave drag force method （TDFM） and power spectrum density method （PSDM） at the same signal-to-noise ratio or trapping stiffness. Third, in experiments, the experimental standard deviations of calibration of trapping stiffness and CF with the SDFM are about less than 50% of TDFM and PSDM especially at low laser power. Finally, the experiments of stretching DNA verify that the in situ calibration with the SDFM improves the measurement stability and accuracy.展开更多
基金supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant Nos.11302220,11374292,and 31100555)the National Basic Research Program of China(Grant No.2011CB910402)
文摘We introduce a corrected sinusoidal-wave drag force method （SDFM） into optical tweezers to calibrate the trapping stiffness of the optical trap and conversion factor （CF） of photodetectors. First, the theoretical analysis and experimental result demonstrate that the correction of SDFM is necessary, especially the error of no correction is up to 11.25% for a bead of 5μm in diameter. Second, the simulation results demonstrate that the SDFM has a better performance in the calibration of optical tweezers than the triangular-wave drag force method （TDFM） and power spectrum density method （PSDM） at the same signal-to-noise ratio or trapping stiffness. Third, in experiments, the experimental standard deviations of calibration of trapping stiffness and CF with the SDFM are about less than 50% of TDFM and PSDM especially at low laser power. Finally, the experiments of stretching DNA verify that the in situ calibration with the SDFM improves the measurement stability and accuracy.
