Climate change is a core issue on which China and the United States(US)are relatively willing to cooperate.Compared with Barack Obama,Joe Biden has incorporated additional elements of climate governance into the compe...Climate change is a core issue on which China and the United States(US)are relatively willing to cooperate.Compared with Barack Obama,Joe Biden has incorporated additional elements of climate governance into the competitive track.His administration has attached increased importance to reciprocity and uniformity in sharing responsibilities,relied heavily on coercion and inducement as methods for advancing relevant policy agendas,and focused on the clean technology sector in a bid to decouple from China.The competitive logic of the climate policy pursued by the Biden administration has spotlighted its objectives:to seek leadership in global climate governance,to serve America's value-oriented diplomacy by manipulating ideologies in the realm of climate governance,and to sustain a relative dominant position in the climate governance system.To a certain extent,the competitive measures by the Biden administration have shaped the external environment of China's development and its participation in global climate governance.However,they can hardly achieve the core objective of serving America's strategic competition against China.Such a competitive climate policy will destabilize the strategic relationship between China and the US,impeding breakthroughs that resemble the Paris Agreement in the multilateral climate process.展开更多
Since the Biden administration came to power, the liberal hawks who uphold the liberal internationalist strategy have regained a significant influence on foreign affairs and national security, prioritized the repair o...Since the Biden administration came to power, the liberal hawks who uphold the liberal internationalist strategy have regained a significant influence on foreign affairs and national security, prioritized the repair of U.S. hegemony, and maintained strategic competition with China initiated by the Trump administration. When compared with the paradigm of competition of the Trump administration, the liberal hawks of the Biden administration have improved the strategic logic of competition with China and refined the relevant policy layout to render it compatible with the overall agenda of the Democratic Party. Enhancing strategic competition with China under the leadership of the liberal hawks has not been in the interests of China, the United States(U.S.), or the entire world. The healthy and stable development of China–U.S. relations requires additional rational and pragmatic policies from the side of the U.S.展开更多
Scientific and technological(S&T) competition has become a core and frontier issue in the ongoing China–U.S. strategic competition and the main focus of both countries. Currently, the Biden administration is adop...Scientific and technological(S&T) competition has become a core and frontier issue in the ongoing China–U.S. strategic competition and the main focus of both countries. Currently, the Biden administration is adopting an S&T competition strategy toward China based on the “small yard, high fence” tactical logic, which involves three pillars: investment to make America strong, alignment to get things under control, and competition to weaken China. In the current context of the China–U.S. competition entering a new normal, five inherent contradictions, namely, the gap between strategic expectations and policy effects, shortfall between action capabilities and policy objectives, push-and-pull between strategic deployment and domestic politics, clash between strategic intentions and the S&T innovation ecosystem, and divergences between American priorities and the interests of American allies, will dictate how this administration will implement its S&T competition strategy toward China.展开更多
文摘Climate change is a core issue on which China and the United States(US)are relatively willing to cooperate.Compared with Barack Obama,Joe Biden has incorporated additional elements of climate governance into the competitive track.His administration has attached increased importance to reciprocity and uniformity in sharing responsibilities,relied heavily on coercion and inducement as methods for advancing relevant policy agendas,and focused on the clean technology sector in a bid to decouple from China.The competitive logic of the climate policy pursued by the Biden administration has spotlighted its objectives:to seek leadership in global climate governance,to serve America's value-oriented diplomacy by manipulating ideologies in the realm of climate governance,and to sustain a relative dominant position in the climate governance system.To a certain extent,the competitive measures by the Biden administration have shaped the external environment of China's development and its participation in global climate governance.However,they can hardly achieve the core objective of serving America's strategic competition against China.Such a competitive climate policy will destabilize the strategic relationship between China and the US,impeding breakthroughs that resemble the Paris Agreement in the multilateral climate process.
文摘Since the Biden administration came to power, the liberal hawks who uphold the liberal internationalist strategy have regained a significant influence on foreign affairs and national security, prioritized the repair of U.S. hegemony, and maintained strategic competition with China initiated by the Trump administration. When compared with the paradigm of competition of the Trump administration, the liberal hawks of the Biden administration have improved the strategic logic of competition with China and refined the relevant policy layout to render it compatible with the overall agenda of the Democratic Party. Enhancing strategic competition with China under the leadership of the liberal hawks has not been in the interests of China, the United States(U.S.), or the entire world. The healthy and stable development of China–U.S. relations requires additional rational and pragmatic policies from the side of the U.S.
基金the phased result of a key project supported by the National Social Science Fund of China entitled“Research on Cyber Governance Systems from the Perspective of a Holistic Approach to National Security”(17ZDA106).
文摘Scientific and technological(S&T) competition has become a core and frontier issue in the ongoing China–U.S. strategic competition and the main focus of both countries. Currently, the Biden administration is adopting an S&T competition strategy toward China based on the “small yard, high fence” tactical logic, which involves three pillars: investment to make America strong, alignment to get things under control, and competition to weaken China. In the current context of the China–U.S. competition entering a new normal, five inherent contradictions, namely, the gap between strategic expectations and policy effects, shortfall between action capabilities and policy objectives, push-and-pull between strategic deployment and domestic politics, clash between strategic intentions and the S&T innovation ecosystem, and divergences between American priorities and the interests of American allies, will dictate how this administration will implement its S&T competition strategy toward China.
