目的探讨脉冲泵椎管内分娩镇痛失败中转剖宫产的麻醉方式。方法120例脉冲泵椎管内分娩镇痛失败中转剖宫产产妇为研究对象,按随机数字表法分为A、B、C三组,各40例。A组实施腰硬联合麻醉,B组使用分娩镇痛留置的导管行硬膜外麻醉,C组实施...目的探讨脉冲泵椎管内分娩镇痛失败中转剖宫产的麻醉方式。方法120例脉冲泵椎管内分娩镇痛失败中转剖宫产产妇为研究对象,按随机数字表法分为A、B、C三组,各40例。A组实施腰硬联合麻醉,B组使用分娩镇痛留置的导管行硬膜外麻醉,C组实施气管插管全身麻醉(全麻)。比较三组围麻醉期并发症发生率,入室至切皮时间及麻醉至胎儿取出时间,新生儿出生时、出生1 min和出生5 min Apgar评分。结果C组围麻醉期高血压、低血压、恶心呕吐发生率显著低于A组和B组(P<0.05);三组围麻醉期误吸发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。C组入室至切皮时间和麻醉至胎儿取出时间分别为(8.2±1.6)、(5.3±0.7)min,均短于A组的(15.7±2.6)、(12.2±2.5)min和B组的(15.6±2.7)、(11.5±2.3)min(P<0.05)。C组新生儿出生时、出生1 min和出生5 min Apgar评分分别为(7.8±1.4)、(8.6±0.4)、(9.1±0.7)分,均显著高于A组的(7.0±0.7)、(7.4±0.6)、(8.0±0.5)分和B组的(7.1±0.8)、(7.5±0.6)、(8.1±0.5)分(P<0.05)。结论气管插管全麻用于脉冲泵椎管内分娩镇痛分娩失败中转剖宫产者,具有并发症少,快速娩出胎儿,减少新生儿窒息风险等优势。展开更多
Objectives To test the feasibility of the use of high thoracic epidural anesthesia as a sole anesthetic in patients undergoing off pump coronary artery bypass surgery, avoiding general anesthesia. Methods Between Octo...Objectives To test the feasibility of the use of high thoracic epidural anesthesia as a sole anesthetic in patients undergoing off pump coronary artery bypass surgery, avoiding general anesthesia. Methods Between October 2002 to April 2003, twenty five cases underwent beating heart coronary artery revascularization without endotracheal general anesthesia, using high thoracic epidural anesthesia and analgesia. All the patients underwent epidural catheterization on the evening before the surgery. Resuits The patients in all received 71 grafts (single n = 11, double n = 5, triple n = 6, quadruple n = 3). Six patients underwent repeat coronary artery bypass. Except one was converted to general anesthesia and cardiopulmonary bypass, the other patients underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery, 2 patients underwent grafting via left thoracotomy (MIDCAB) and the rest through mid sternotomy. There was no mortality. Mean length of stay in the intensive care unit was 16 .2 ( 4.2 hours and hospital was 3.0(1.2 days. Conclusions Our experience confirms the feasibility of performing multiple coronary artery bypasses in conscious patients without endotracheal general anesthesia展开更多
目的比较体外循环和非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(OPCAB)的麻醉方法及术后恢复情况。方法131例择期行冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)患者随机分为体外循环组(on-pump组,n=45)和非体外循环组(off-pump组,n=86),比较两组的麻醉药用量,术中失...目的比较体外循环和非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(OPCAB)的麻醉方法及术后恢复情况。方法131例择期行冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)患者随机分为体外循环组(on-pump组,n=45)和非体外循环组(off-pump组,n=86),比较两组的麻醉药用量,术中失血及补液,麻醉恢复,术后并发症以及心肌酶变化等情况。结果两组患者术前资料相似。off-pump组麻醉时间较on-pump组短[(244±47)m in Vs(312±59)m in](P<0.05)。on-pump组术中出血量、自体血回输量、红细胞、血浆及血小板用量均多于off-pump组(P<0.05)。两组患者血管吻合支数[off-pump组(2.7±0.6)Vs on-pump组(2.9±0.7)]无显著差异(P>0.05)。两组患者围术期均无死亡。与on-pump组相比,off-pump组术后苏醒时间、呼吸机辅助时间、气管导管拔出时间及ICU停留时间明显缩短(P<0.05)。off-pump组术后肾、肺及中枢神经系统并发症发生率明显低于on-pump组(P<0.05)。两组CK-MB术后均升高,on-pump组明显高于off-pump组(P<0.05)。结论两组患者麻醉效果满意,OP-CAB手术对麻醉要求更高。与传统CABG手术相比,OPCAB术后并发症发生率低,恢复更快。展开更多
文摘目的探讨脉冲泵椎管内分娩镇痛失败中转剖宫产的麻醉方式。方法120例脉冲泵椎管内分娩镇痛失败中转剖宫产产妇为研究对象,按随机数字表法分为A、B、C三组,各40例。A组实施腰硬联合麻醉,B组使用分娩镇痛留置的导管行硬膜外麻醉,C组实施气管插管全身麻醉(全麻)。比较三组围麻醉期并发症发生率,入室至切皮时间及麻醉至胎儿取出时间,新生儿出生时、出生1 min和出生5 min Apgar评分。结果C组围麻醉期高血压、低血压、恶心呕吐发生率显著低于A组和B组(P<0.05);三组围麻醉期误吸发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。C组入室至切皮时间和麻醉至胎儿取出时间分别为(8.2±1.6)、(5.3±0.7)min,均短于A组的(15.7±2.6)、(12.2±2.5)min和B组的(15.6±2.7)、(11.5±2.3)min(P<0.05)。C组新生儿出生时、出生1 min和出生5 min Apgar评分分别为(7.8±1.4)、(8.6±0.4)、(9.1±0.7)分,均显著高于A组的(7.0±0.7)、(7.4±0.6)、(8.0±0.5)分和B组的(7.1±0.8)、(7.5±0.6)、(8.1±0.5)分(P<0.05)。结论气管插管全麻用于脉冲泵椎管内分娩镇痛分娩失败中转剖宫产者,具有并发症少,快速娩出胎儿,减少新生儿窒息风险等优势。
文摘Objectives To test the feasibility of the use of high thoracic epidural anesthesia as a sole anesthetic in patients undergoing off pump coronary artery bypass surgery, avoiding general anesthesia. Methods Between October 2002 to April 2003, twenty five cases underwent beating heart coronary artery revascularization without endotracheal general anesthesia, using high thoracic epidural anesthesia and analgesia. All the patients underwent epidural catheterization on the evening before the surgery. Resuits The patients in all received 71 grafts (single n = 11, double n = 5, triple n = 6, quadruple n = 3). Six patients underwent repeat coronary artery bypass. Except one was converted to general anesthesia and cardiopulmonary bypass, the other patients underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery, 2 patients underwent grafting via left thoracotomy (MIDCAB) and the rest through mid sternotomy. There was no mortality. Mean length of stay in the intensive care unit was 16 .2 ( 4.2 hours and hospital was 3.0(1.2 days. Conclusions Our experience confirms the feasibility of performing multiple coronary artery bypasses in conscious patients without endotracheal general anesthesia
文摘目的比较体外循环和非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(OPCAB)的麻醉方法及术后恢复情况。方法131例择期行冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)患者随机分为体外循环组(on-pump组,n=45)和非体外循环组(off-pump组,n=86),比较两组的麻醉药用量,术中失血及补液,麻醉恢复,术后并发症以及心肌酶变化等情况。结果两组患者术前资料相似。off-pump组麻醉时间较on-pump组短[(244±47)m in Vs(312±59)m in](P<0.05)。on-pump组术中出血量、自体血回输量、红细胞、血浆及血小板用量均多于off-pump组(P<0.05)。两组患者血管吻合支数[off-pump组(2.7±0.6)Vs on-pump组(2.9±0.7)]无显著差异(P>0.05)。两组患者围术期均无死亡。与on-pump组相比,off-pump组术后苏醒时间、呼吸机辅助时间、气管导管拔出时间及ICU停留时间明显缩短(P<0.05)。off-pump组术后肾、肺及中枢神经系统并发症发生率明显低于on-pump组(P<0.05)。两组CK-MB术后均升高,on-pump组明显高于off-pump组(P<0.05)。结论两组患者麻醉效果满意,OP-CAB手术对麻醉要求更高。与传统CABG手术相比,OPCAB术后并发症发生率低,恢复更快。