Efficiency and safety of laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy: A study of intrathecal vs extrathecal Glissonean pedicle techniques

BACKGROUND Selective hemihepatic vascular occlusion is utilized in both right and left hemihepatectomies to preserve blood supply to the intact lobe,maintain hemo-dynamic stability,and mitigate surgical risks.While this technique encompasses both intrathecal and extrathecal Glissonean pedicle transection methods,there is a lack of systematic comparative reports on these two approaches.AIM To retrospectively analyze the clinical data of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)undergoing laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy in our hospital to explore the feasibility,safety,and short-and long-term efficacy of extrathecal and intrathecal Glissonean pedicle transection methods in laparo-scopic left hemihepatectomy.METHODS A retrospective study was performed to analyze the clinical data of 49 HCC patients who underwent laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy from January 2019 to December 2022 in our hospital.These patients were divided into extrathecal Glissonean pedicle transection(EGP)group(n=24)and intrathecal Glissonean pedicle transection(IGP)group(n=25)according to the different approaches used for selective hemihepatic vascular occlusion.The perioperative indicators,liver function indexes,complications,and follow-up findings were compared between these two groups.RESULTS The surgeries were smooth in both groups,and no perioperative death was noted.The hepatic pedicle transection time and the operation time were(16.1±2.3)minutes and(129.6±19.0)minutes,respectively,in the EGP group,which were significantly shorter than those in the IGP group[(25.5±2.4)minutes and(184.8±26.0)minutes,respectively],both P<0.01.There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss,time to anal exhaust,hospital stay,drain indwelling time,and postoperative liver function between the two groups(all P>0.05).The incidence of postoperative complications showed no significant difference[16.67%(4/24)vs 16.0%(4/25),P>0.05].All the 49 HCC patients were followed up after surgery(range:11.2-53.3 months;median:36.4 months).The overall survival rate and disease-free survival rate were not significantly different(both P>0.05).CONCLUSION Both extrathecal and intrathecal Glissonean pedicle approaches are effective and safe hepatic inflow occlusion techniques in laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy for HCC.However,the extrathecal approach simplifies the hepatic pedicle transection,shortens the operation time,and increases the surgical efficiency,making it a more feasible technique.

A comparison of financial and operational efficiency between smart and traditional insufflation for laparoscopic surgery: A granular analysis

Objective:Smart insufflation(SI)techniques relying on valve and membrane-free insufflation are increasing in usage.Although considerable literature exists demonstrating the benefits of SI on procedural ease and patient outcomes,there remains a paucity describing the financial impact of these devices.The purpose of this study was to determine the financial and efficiency impact of these devices on the operating room and inpatient wards of a hospital.Methods:A discrete event simulation model representing a typical mid-sized North American hospital comparing SI to traditional insufflation(TI)was generated.The National Surgical Quality Improvement database from 2015 to 2019 was used to populate the model with data supplemented from the literature.Outcomes included length of stay(LOS),duration of surgery(DOS),annual procedure volume,profit,return on investment(ROI),and gross profit margin(GPM).From the literature review,DOS savings were 10e32 minutes/case,while LOS savings were 0e3 days/case.Results:Implementation of an SI led to an increase in annual throughput of 42e346(4.4%e36.6%)cases for all procedures and 38 to 297(4.3%e33.3%)cases for complex procedures.LOS was found to be decreased by 175e614(18.3%e64.2%)days for all procedures and 231 to 614(35.6%e77.9%)cases for complex procedures with the implementation of an SI.Together,this resulted in an increase in net profit of$104,685 per annum.The ROI of SI over the TI device was>1000%,and the GPM for the TI was 90.0%,while the GPM for the SI was 71.7%.Conclusion:Despite the initial financial investment being greater,the implementation of SI offsets these expenses and yields significant financial benefits.Our study demonstrates the financial benefits of SI over TI and illustrates how granular operational and financial analyses of technologies are essential to aid in sound healthcare procurement decision making.