<strong>Background:</strong> Since bleedings in surgery are infrequent and inexperienced, we always try to proceed with surgery assuming a crisis situation, adhere to routine procedures and its standardiza...<strong>Background:</strong> Since bleedings in surgery are infrequent and inexperienced, we always try to proceed with surgery assuming a crisis situation, adhere to routine procedures and its standardization. We focus on the bleeding accidents and reveal how to implement a resilient healthcare theory. By clarifying the Safety-I and Safety-II, we developed a system to support surgical safety based on the surgeon’s individual, team, and organization. <strong>Material and Methods:</strong> We searched 25 cases of bleeding incidents in thoracic surgery, which were obtained from the database of the Project to Collect Medical Near-Miss/Adverse Event Information of the Japan Council of Quality Health Care in April 2018. Retrospectively, we analyzed 13 hemorrhage cases in our department between July 2002 and March 2020. We studied their surgical factors such as procedures, sites and causes of bleeding, response, treatment, and outcomes. <strong>Results:</strong> The causes of bleeding included damage of the adhesion detachment, insertions of automatic sutures and forceps, detachment of ultrasonic scalpel, vascular taping, removal of resected lung, lymph node dissection, exfoliation of the infiltrated adventitia of vessels, pull-out of vessel, gauze attachment with staple cut-line of vessel, thoracoscopic collision, infectious vascular rupture, detachment of vascular ligature, and suction tube hit. We summarized the variation in the usual controllable and unexpected uncontrollable bleeding and learned how to respond and treat them. We built up the balanced combination of Safety-I and Safety-II in the daily routine work in normal surgery, the patient’s individual factors, the massive bleeding, and its life-threatening crisis. <strong>Conclusions:</strong> We can learn how to prevent and respond to bleeding accidents by developing a system to support surgical safety (Safety-I and Safety-II). We can flexibly respond to unexpected bleeding disturbances under constraints by adjusting the surgeon’s individuals, team, and organization.展开更多
BACKGROUND Due to the prolonged life expectancy and increased risk of colorectal cancer(CRC)among patients with human immunodeficiency virus(HIV)infection,the prognosis and pathological features of CRC in HIV-positive...BACKGROUND Due to the prolonged life expectancy and increased risk of colorectal cancer(CRC)among patients with human immunodeficiency virus(HIV)infection,the prognosis and pathological features of CRC in HIV-positive patients require examination.AIM To compare the differences in oncological features,surgical safety,and prognosis between patients with and without HIV infection who have CRC at the same tumor stage and site.METHODS In this retrospective study,we collected data from HIV-positive and-negative patients who underwent radical resection for CRC.Using random stratified sampling,24 HIV-positive and 363 HIV-negative patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma after radical resection were selected.Using propensity score matching,we selected 72 patients,matched 1:2(HIV-positive:negative=24:48).Differences in basic characteristics,HIV acquisition,perioperative serological indicators,surgical safety,oncological features,and long-term prognosis were compared between the two groups.RESULTS Fewer patients with HIV infection underwent chemotherapy compared to patients without.HIV-positive patients had fewer preoperative and postoperative leukocytes,fewer preoperative lymphocytes,lower carcinoembryonic antigen levels,more intraoperative blood loss,more metastatic lymph nodes,higher node stage,higher tumor node metastasis stage,shorter overall survival,and shorter progression-free survival compared to patients who were HIV-negative.CONCLUSION Compared with CRC patients who are HIV-negative,patients with HIV infection have more metastatic lymph nodes and worse long-term survival after surgery.Standard treatment options for HIV-positive patients with CRC should be explored.展开更多
文摘<strong>Background:</strong> Since bleedings in surgery are infrequent and inexperienced, we always try to proceed with surgery assuming a crisis situation, adhere to routine procedures and its standardization. We focus on the bleeding accidents and reveal how to implement a resilient healthcare theory. By clarifying the Safety-I and Safety-II, we developed a system to support surgical safety based on the surgeon’s individual, team, and organization. <strong>Material and Methods:</strong> We searched 25 cases of bleeding incidents in thoracic surgery, which were obtained from the database of the Project to Collect Medical Near-Miss/Adverse Event Information of the Japan Council of Quality Health Care in April 2018. Retrospectively, we analyzed 13 hemorrhage cases in our department between July 2002 and March 2020. We studied their surgical factors such as procedures, sites and causes of bleeding, response, treatment, and outcomes. <strong>Results:</strong> The causes of bleeding included damage of the adhesion detachment, insertions of automatic sutures and forceps, detachment of ultrasonic scalpel, vascular taping, removal of resected lung, lymph node dissection, exfoliation of the infiltrated adventitia of vessels, pull-out of vessel, gauze attachment with staple cut-line of vessel, thoracoscopic collision, infectious vascular rupture, detachment of vascular ligature, and suction tube hit. We summarized the variation in the usual controllable and unexpected uncontrollable bleeding and learned how to respond and treat them. We built up the balanced combination of Safety-I and Safety-II in the daily routine work in normal surgery, the patient’s individual factors, the massive bleeding, and its life-threatening crisis. <strong>Conclusions:</strong> We can learn how to prevent and respond to bleeding accidents by developing a system to support surgical safety (Safety-I and Safety-II). We can flexibly respond to unexpected bleeding disturbances under constraints by adjusting the surgeon’s individuals, team, and organization.
基金Supported by General Plan of the Future Medical Youth Innovation Team Development Support Plan of Chongqing Medical University,No.03030299QC-W0007.
文摘BACKGROUND Due to the prolonged life expectancy and increased risk of colorectal cancer(CRC)among patients with human immunodeficiency virus(HIV)infection,the prognosis and pathological features of CRC in HIV-positive patients require examination.AIM To compare the differences in oncological features,surgical safety,and prognosis between patients with and without HIV infection who have CRC at the same tumor stage and site.METHODS In this retrospective study,we collected data from HIV-positive and-negative patients who underwent radical resection for CRC.Using random stratified sampling,24 HIV-positive and 363 HIV-negative patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma after radical resection were selected.Using propensity score matching,we selected 72 patients,matched 1:2(HIV-positive:negative=24:48).Differences in basic characteristics,HIV acquisition,perioperative serological indicators,surgical safety,oncological features,and long-term prognosis were compared between the two groups.RESULTS Fewer patients with HIV infection underwent chemotherapy compared to patients without.HIV-positive patients had fewer preoperative and postoperative leukocytes,fewer preoperative lymphocytes,lower carcinoembryonic antigen levels,more intraoperative blood loss,more metastatic lymph nodes,higher node stage,higher tumor node metastasis stage,shorter overall survival,and shorter progression-free survival compared to patients who were HIV-negative.CONCLUSION Compared with CRC patients who are HIV-negative,patients with HIV infection have more metastatic lymph nodes and worse long-term survival after surgery.Standard treatment options for HIV-positive patients with CRC should be explored.