It is difficult to distinguish tamping coke and top charging coke by conventional testing methods, such as cold strength, abrasion resistance, reactivity and strength after reaction. Some of tamping coket s properties...It is difficult to distinguish tamping coke and top charging coke by conventional testing methods, such as cold strength, abrasion resistance, reactivity and strength after reaction. Some of tamping coket s properties were even bet-ter than those of top charging coke, hut from practical using effects of blast furnace, tamping coke was not as good as top charging coke. The reaction conditions were featured as high temperature, high alkali condition, intense reac-tion atmosphere and short time. Distribution of porosity in profile, microstructure and slag forming property of ash were analyzed and following conclusions were obtained. After alkali-rich reaction, there were obvious differences be- tween top charging coke and tamping coke in microstructure, The porosityts unevenness of tamping coke was greater than those of top charging coke, and tamping coke was with less and big pores in out space and inner part was dense with more throughout pores. After phase diagram and microstructure analysis, it could he obtained that ash forming characteristics of top charging coke were better than those of tamping coke, and top charging coke＇ s pores were blocked more seriously than those of tamping coke. From analysis of tuyere samples, it could be found that calcium content of ash in coke＇s pores was small and it should belong to coke＇s inherent ash; kalium （wκ =28%） was unusu-ally high in coke. so the situation of high alkali was close to real blast furnace reaction condition.展开更多
文摘It is difficult to distinguish tamping coke and top charging coke by conventional testing methods, such as cold strength, abrasion resistance, reactivity and strength after reaction. Some of tamping coket s properties were even bet-ter than those of top charging coke, hut from practical using effects of blast furnace, tamping coke was not as good as top charging coke. The reaction conditions were featured as high temperature, high alkali condition, intense reac-tion atmosphere and short time. Distribution of porosity in profile, microstructure and slag forming property of ash were analyzed and following conclusions were obtained. After alkali-rich reaction, there were obvious differences be- tween top charging coke and tamping coke in microstructure, The porosityts unevenness of tamping coke was greater than those of top charging coke, and tamping coke was with less and big pores in out space and inner part was dense with more throughout pores. After phase diagram and microstructure analysis, it could he obtained that ash forming characteristics of top charging coke were better than those of tamping coke, and top charging coke＇ s pores were blocked more seriously than those of tamping coke. From analysis of tuyere samples, it could be found that calcium content of ash in coke＇s pores was small and it should belong to coke＇s inherent ash; kalium （wκ =28%） was unusu-ally high in coke. so the situation of high alkali was close to real blast furnace reaction condition.
