This paper compares the effectiveness of one-semester-long instruction of teacher-student collaborative assessment(TSCA)and trained peer review assessment(TPRA).Dependent variables include occurrence of structural ele...This paper compares the effectiveness of one-semester-long instruction of teacher-student collaborative assessment(TSCA)and trained peer review assessment(TPRA).Dependent variables include occurrence of structural elements of the simplified Toulmin model,and improvement of argumentation substance which refers to the quality of reasoning reflected in Toulmin structural elements.Eighty-one sophomore English majors from TSCA group(n=41)and TPRA group(n=40)were asked to construct two argumentative essays at both the beginning and the end of the semester.The results reveal that the TSCA group produced significantly more counterargument claims and rebuttal data.Additionally,the TSCA group significantly outperformed TPRA group in constructing stronger counterargument claim,rebuttal claim and rebuttal data.展开更多
The paper is a part of an ongoing study, labelled as "Designing out wicked problems" - a design science research (DSR) study with the purpose of developing, implementing, and evaluating a methodology framework for...The paper is a part of an ongoing study, labelled as "Designing out wicked problems" - a design science research (DSR) study with the purpose of developing, implementing, and evaluating a methodology framework for designing multi-stakeholder business models. The objective of the current paper is to evaluate the business model design framework within a DSR framework. The research is conducted as three-year case study at three sites: The Danish police, with a key player in the Danish energy sector, and the municipality of the Danish capital, Copenhagen. The research method is action research, with a structure of planning-action-evaluation process conducted with the case owners - as well as design science methodology, where an artifact (the multi-stakeholder business model design concept) is created, evaluated and altered to improve its functionality. The finding of this study is that the maturity of the application domain - the type of problem the concept is trying to solve - as well as of the concept itself, is low. The conclusion is thus that the knowledge contribution of the study is of a unique invention character which will lay the foundation for further evaluation and research.展开更多
With the global rise of Web 2.0 a completely new type of business models—business platforms has arisen and nowadays Amazon,Apple,Google,Facebook are convincingly taking over the lead in global business world(Simon,20...With the global rise of Web 2.0 a completely new type of business models—business platforms has arisen and nowadays Amazon,Apple,Google,Facebook are convincingly taking over the lead in global business world(Simon,2011).These four flagship business platforms are followed by countless other platforms in all spheres of business and contemporary life(eBay,Airbnb,Uber,etc.).However,the MBA study courses that could cover all sides of business platform microeconomics and explain their enormous economical success are rarely provided in Europe and still not existed in many countries including Latvia.This paper describes the author’s research of specific microeconomics characteristics of business platforms,the different ways of thinking in marketing,competition and money making strategies in business platforms,platform business determinants,detailed comparison of traditional(“pipe”)business models and business platforms,the strengths and weaknesses of platform business models.As the result of this research,author has elaborated the original MBA study course—“Business Platform Microeconomics”and its detailed plan is attached in references of this paper1.In conclusions,author expressed how specifics of business platform microeconomics define completely different main components of the business model in business platforms in comparison to traditional“pipe”type business models,what is explaining the enormous economic success of this new business model—business platforms.展开更多
With the rise of the platform economy,the retail industry is facing great pressure to shift from a traditional growth model to a platform-based growth model.The one-sided market theory applicable to the traditional bu...With the rise of the platform economy,the retail industry is facing great pressure to shift from a traditional growth model to a platform-based growth model.The one-sided market theory applicable to the traditional business models cannot adequately explain business model innovation in the platform-based growth model.Based on a systematic analysis of the platform economy theory,business model innovation theory,value co-creation theory,and dynamic capability theory and in light of the characteristics of the retail industry,this paper proposes that to achieve platform-based growth,retail business model innovation should be focused on changing the ways to create customer value and capture enterprise value and leveraging modern information systems to achieve value co-creation during the transformation of key business processes ranging from procurement and sales to distribution.In addition,enterprises must get rid of the mindset of making profi ts from the difference between buying and selling prices and should instead explore new sources of revenue through linking dividend and information value.As platform operators,retail enterprises need to develop dynamic capabilities through the interaction of heterogeneous resources of various platform participants and especially the introduction of social resources,so as to propel innovation in retail business models and ultimately the transformation from traditional growth to platform-based growth.展开更多
基金supported by China Foreign Language Education Fund(10th Batch)granted by Beijing Foreign Studies University,directed by Prof.Xiaoyan XU[Grant Number:ZGWYJYJJ10A130]Sichuan Research Center of Foreign Languages and LiteratureHigher Education Press,directed by Yuexin ZHONG[Grant Number:SCWYGJ21-10]。
文摘This paper compares the effectiveness of one-semester-long instruction of teacher-student collaborative assessment(TSCA)and trained peer review assessment(TPRA).Dependent variables include occurrence of structural elements of the simplified Toulmin model,and improvement of argumentation substance which refers to the quality of reasoning reflected in Toulmin structural elements.Eighty-one sophomore English majors from TSCA group(n=41)and TPRA group(n=40)were asked to construct two argumentative essays at both the beginning and the end of the semester.The results reveal that the TSCA group produced significantly more counterargument claims and rebuttal data.Additionally,the TSCA group significantly outperformed TPRA group in constructing stronger counterargument claim,rebuttal claim and rebuttal data.
文摘The paper is a part of an ongoing study, labelled as "Designing out wicked problems" - a design science research (DSR) study with the purpose of developing, implementing, and evaluating a methodology framework for designing multi-stakeholder business models. The objective of the current paper is to evaluate the business model design framework within a DSR framework. The research is conducted as three-year case study at three sites: The Danish police, with a key player in the Danish energy sector, and the municipality of the Danish capital, Copenhagen. The research method is action research, with a structure of planning-action-evaluation process conducted with the case owners - as well as design science methodology, where an artifact (the multi-stakeholder business model design concept) is created, evaluated and altered to improve its functionality. The finding of this study is that the maturity of the application domain - the type of problem the concept is trying to solve - as well as of the concept itself, is low. The conclusion is thus that the knowledge contribution of the study is of a unique invention character which will lay the foundation for further evaluation and research.
文摘With the global rise of Web 2.0 a completely new type of business models—business platforms has arisen and nowadays Amazon,Apple,Google,Facebook are convincingly taking over the lead in global business world(Simon,2011).These four flagship business platforms are followed by countless other platforms in all spheres of business and contemporary life(eBay,Airbnb,Uber,etc.).However,the MBA study courses that could cover all sides of business platform microeconomics and explain their enormous economical success are rarely provided in Europe and still not existed in many countries including Latvia.This paper describes the author’s research of specific microeconomics characteristics of business platforms,the different ways of thinking in marketing,competition and money making strategies in business platforms,platform business determinants,detailed comparison of traditional(“pipe”)business models and business platforms,the strengths and weaknesses of platform business models.As the result of this research,author has elaborated the original MBA study course—“Business Platform Microeconomics”and its detailed plan is attached in references of this paper1.In conclusions,author expressed how specifics of business platform microeconomics define completely different main components of the business model in business platforms in comparison to traditional“pipe”type business models,what is explaining the enormous economic success of this new business model—business platforms.
基金Key Project of National Social Science Fund of China“Circulation Model Innovation and Quality Consumption Promotion:Path,Mechanism,and Policy System”(19AJY020)Fujian Province Social Science Fund“Research on Retail Business Model Innovation in the Context of Platform Economy”(FJ2019B138).
文摘With the rise of the platform economy,the retail industry is facing great pressure to shift from a traditional growth model to a platform-based growth model.The one-sided market theory applicable to the traditional business models cannot adequately explain business model innovation in the platform-based growth model.Based on a systematic analysis of the platform economy theory,business model innovation theory,value co-creation theory,and dynamic capability theory and in light of the characteristics of the retail industry,this paper proposes that to achieve platform-based growth,retail business model innovation should be focused on changing the ways to create customer value and capture enterprise value and leveraging modern information systems to achieve value co-creation during the transformation of key business processes ranging from procurement and sales to distribution.In addition,enterprises must get rid of the mindset of making profi ts from the difference between buying and selling prices and should instead explore new sources of revenue through linking dividend and information value.As platform operators,retail enterprises need to develop dynamic capabilities through the interaction of heterogeneous resources of various platform participants and especially the introduction of social resources,so as to propel innovation in retail business models and ultimately the transformation from traditional growth to platform-based growth.