In the presented paper,the author,referring to several examples of Polish contemporary art,reflects on the concept of criticism.The author asks the question:Whether are we dealing in late capitalism with a post-critic...In the presented paper,the author,referring to several examples of Polish contemporary art,reflects on the concept of criticism.The author asks the question:Whether are we dealing in late capitalism with a post-critical turn in art and philosophical thinking at all?He analyzes the post-critical turn by referring to other concepts such as immanent critique(S.Turkle),critique in the field of immanence(G.Deleuze),post-theoretical culture(T.Eagelton),assembly art(G.Didi-Huberman),“technical perfection”(M.Heidegger),mnemotechnics(J.Derrida),mechanosphere(G.Deleuze&F.Guattari),and finally the famous distinction of Walter Benjamin between“display value”of the work of art and its“cult value”.The ultimate goal of the article is to determine the possibility of criticism(critique)in the age of techno-or affective capitalism(L.Berlant&B.Stiergler).At the end,the author poses the question:To what society we belong?Are we part of the“society of display value”or a“co-creative society”?展开更多
文摘In the presented paper,the author,referring to several examples of Polish contemporary art,reflects on the concept of criticism.The author asks the question:Whether are we dealing in late capitalism with a post-critical turn in art and philosophical thinking at all?He analyzes the post-critical turn by referring to other concepts such as immanent critique(S.Turkle),critique in the field of immanence(G.Deleuze),post-theoretical culture(T.Eagelton),assembly art(G.Didi-Huberman),“technical perfection”(M.Heidegger),mnemotechnics(J.Derrida),mechanosphere(G.Deleuze&F.Guattari),and finally the famous distinction of Walter Benjamin between“display value”of the work of art and its“cult value”.The ultimate goal of the article is to determine the possibility of criticism(critique)in the age of techno-or affective capitalism(L.Berlant&B.Stiergler).At the end,the author poses the question:To what society we belong?Are we part of the“society of display value”or a“co-creative society”?
