Usual recommendations concerning the principles of effective economic policy that were given by international experts, closely connected with the ＂Washington consensus＂ approach, for the transitive countries, especi...Usual recommendations concerning the principles of effective economic policy that were given by international experts, closely connected with the ＂Washington consensus＂ approach, for the transitive countries, especially to Ukraine, do not contain requirements of the active innovation technological policy, stressing importance the measures which provide efficiency of the existing production structure. This article discusses and criticizes such attitude as the strategic methodological platform. The theoretical backgrounds of the presented analysis lay in the Schumpeterian innovation theory of economic development and the Neo-Schumpeterian approaches concerning decisive value of structural and technological change for economic growth. It gives arguments for standpoint that a follow-up economic development can be successful if a country will be able to have expansion of new modem sectors and more innovative structure of production, as investments in the process of innovation must guarantee a permanent structural reform of the national economy on a new technological basis. One of the main means of realization should be the diversification of the organizational forms of the national economy, ensuring the cooperation of small, medium and large companies within the innovation ＂science-technology-production＂ cycle. Conclusion that in transitive countries and in Ukraine the contemporary innovation policy should provide effective mechanisms of investing into large-scale structural changes for the benefit of the sectors of the fifth and sixth technological paradigm.展开更多
文摘Usual recommendations concerning the principles of effective economic policy that were given by international experts, closely connected with the ＂Washington consensus＂ approach, for the transitive countries, especially to Ukraine, do not contain requirements of the active innovation technological policy, stressing importance the measures which provide efficiency of the existing production structure. This article discusses and criticizes such attitude as the strategic methodological platform. The theoretical backgrounds of the presented analysis lay in the Schumpeterian innovation theory of economic development and the Neo-Schumpeterian approaches concerning decisive value of structural and technological change for economic growth. It gives arguments for standpoint that a follow-up economic development can be successful if a country will be able to have expansion of new modem sectors and more innovative structure of production, as investments in the process of innovation must guarantee a permanent structural reform of the national economy on a new technological basis. One of the main means of realization should be the diversification of the organizational forms of the national economy, ensuring the cooperation of small, medium and large companies within the innovation ＂science-technology-production＂ cycle. Conclusion that in transitive countries and in Ukraine the contemporary innovation policy should provide effective mechanisms of investing into large-scale structural changes for the benefit of the sectors of the fifth and sixth technological paradigm.
