Tendon autografts play an important role in upper limb reconstruction and a working knowledge of tendon autograft options is essential for the surgeon. Although palmaris longus is often the first choice, other options...Tendon autografts play an important role in upper limb reconstruction and a working knowledge of tendon autograft options is essential for the surgeon. Although palmaris longus is often the first choice, other options like plantaris, extensor Hallucis longus, flexor carpi radialis are readily available. Advantages of autografts include easy availability, satisfactory biomechanical properties and the human body tends to accept its own tendons than from a donor. This review highlights the various options available and their anatomical and surgical considerations in procuring grafts for upper limb reconstructive work.展开更多
目的:比较关节镜下桡侧腕短伸肌腱(ECRB)止点清理术和体外冲击波治疗(ESWT)对慢性肱骨外上髁炎的临床疗效。方法:研究纳入2017年1月至2020年12月慢性肱骨外上髁炎患者50例,按照随机数字表法将患者分为关节镜下ERCB止点清理手术组(25例)...目的:比较关节镜下桡侧腕短伸肌腱(ECRB)止点清理术和体外冲击波治疗(ESWT)对慢性肱骨外上髁炎的临床疗效。方法:研究纳入2017年1月至2020年12月慢性肱骨外上髁炎患者50例,按照随机数字表法将患者分为关节镜下ERCB止点清理手术组(25例)和冲击波组(25例)。分别于治疗前、治疗后3个月、6个月和12个月采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)疼痛评分,臂、肩、手障碍(DASH)评分,梅奥肘关节功能评分(MEPS),重返工作时间评估两种方法的临床效果。采用Spearman相关系数法分析治疗后功能评分与患者基本资料的相关性。结果:功能评分结果显示,两组患者治疗后的DASH评分及VAS评分显著下降,MEPS评分显著提高(P<0.05)。组间比较,治疗后3个月时,冲击波组和手术组两组间DASH评分无显著性差异(46±12 vs 49±11;P=0.39),冲击波组MEPS评分显著高于手术组(87±7 vs 80±7;P=0.002),而冲击波组VAS评分显著低于手术组(2±1 vs 3±1;P=0.002)。在治疗后6个月及12个月,两组间在DASH评分、MEPS评分及VAS评分方面均无显著性差异。相关性分析发现,冲击波组功能评分与性别、年龄及体质指数(BMI)相关,而手术组功能评分与年龄、局封次数及ECRB病变程度相关。结论:关节镜下ECRB止点清理手术和冲击波均是治疗慢性肱骨外上髁炎的有效方法,在治疗后早期缓解疼痛方面冲击波治疗优于关节镜下ECRB止点清理术。展开更多
Nerve transfers for peripheral nerve injuries have become increasingly popular over the past two decades.While techniques for ulnar nerve repair have been well-documented,more recent techniques for median and radial n...Nerve transfers for peripheral nerve injuries have become increasingly popular over the past two decades.While techniques for ulnar nerve repair have been well-documented,more recent techniques for median and radial nerve branch reinnervation are still being explored.This review describes the outcomes of common and emerging techniques for reinnervation of the distal branches of the median and radial nerves.展开更多
文摘Tendon autografts play an important role in upper limb reconstruction and a working knowledge of tendon autograft options is essential for the surgeon. Although palmaris longus is often the first choice, other options like plantaris, extensor Hallucis longus, flexor carpi radialis are readily available. Advantages of autografts include easy availability, satisfactory biomechanical properties and the human body tends to accept its own tendons than from a donor. This review highlights the various options available and their anatomical and surgical considerations in procuring grafts for upper limb reconstructive work.
文摘目的:比较关节镜下桡侧腕短伸肌腱(ECRB)止点清理术和体外冲击波治疗(ESWT)对慢性肱骨外上髁炎的临床疗效。方法:研究纳入2017年1月至2020年12月慢性肱骨外上髁炎患者50例,按照随机数字表法将患者分为关节镜下ERCB止点清理手术组(25例)和冲击波组(25例)。分别于治疗前、治疗后3个月、6个月和12个月采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)疼痛评分,臂、肩、手障碍(DASH)评分,梅奥肘关节功能评分(MEPS),重返工作时间评估两种方法的临床效果。采用Spearman相关系数法分析治疗后功能评分与患者基本资料的相关性。结果:功能评分结果显示,两组患者治疗后的DASH评分及VAS评分显著下降,MEPS评分显著提高(P<0.05)。组间比较,治疗后3个月时,冲击波组和手术组两组间DASH评分无显著性差异(46±12 vs 49±11;P=0.39),冲击波组MEPS评分显著高于手术组(87±7 vs 80±7;P=0.002),而冲击波组VAS评分显著低于手术组(2±1 vs 3±1;P=0.002)。在治疗后6个月及12个月,两组间在DASH评分、MEPS评分及VAS评分方面均无显著性差异。相关性分析发现,冲击波组功能评分与性别、年龄及体质指数(BMI)相关,而手术组功能评分与年龄、局封次数及ECRB病变程度相关。结论:关节镜下ECRB止点清理手术和冲击波均是治疗慢性肱骨外上髁炎的有效方法,在治疗后早期缓解疼痛方面冲击波治疗优于关节镜下ECRB止点清理术。
文摘Nerve transfers for peripheral nerve injuries have become increasingly popular over the past two decades.While techniques for ulnar nerve repair have been well-documented,more recent techniques for median and radial nerve branch reinnervation are still being explored.This review describes the outcomes of common and emerging techniques for reinnervation of the distal branches of the median and radial nerves.