Improvement of hepatic fibrosis after tenofovir disoproxil fumarate switching to tenofovir alafenamide for three years

BACKGROUND Both tenofovir alafenamide(TAF)and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate(TDF)are the first-line treatments for chronic hepatitis B(CHB).We have showed switching from TDF to TAF for 96 weeks resulted in further alanine aminotransferase(ALT)improvement,but data remain lacking on the long-term benefits of TDF switching to TAF on hepatic fibrosis.AIM To assess the benefits of TDF switching to TAF for 3 years on ALT,aspartate aminotransferase(AST),and hepatic fibrosis improvement in patients with CHB.METHODS A single center retrospective study on 53 patients with CHB who were initially treated with TDF,then switched to TAF to determine dynamic patterns of ALT,AST,AST to platelet ratio index(APRI),fibrosis-4(FIB-4)scores,and shear wave elastography(SWE)reading improvement at switching week 144,and the associated factors.RESULTS The mean age was 55(28-80);45.3%,males;15.1%,clinical cirrhosis;mean baseline ALT,24.8;AST,25.7 U/L;APRI,0.37;and FIB-4,1.66.After 144 weeks TDF switching to TAF,mean ALT and AST were reduced to 19.7 and 21,respectively.From baseline to switching week 144,the rates of ALT and AST<35(male)/25(female)and<30(male)/19(female)were persistently increased;hepatic fibrosis was also improved by APRI<0.5,from 79.2%to 96.2%;FIB-4<1.45,from 52.8%to 58.5%,respectively;mean APRI was reduced to 0.27;FIB-4,to 1.38;and mean SWE reading,from 7.05 to 6.30 kPa after a mean of 109 weeks switching.The renal function was stable and the frequency of patients with glomerular filtration rate>60 mL/min was increased from 86.5%at baseline to 88.2%at switching week 144.CONCLUSION Our data confirmed that switching from TDF to TAF for 3 years results in not only persistent ALT/AST improvement,but also hepatic fibrosis improvement by APRI,FIB-4 scores,as well as SWE reading,the important clinical benefits of long-term hepatitis B virus antiviral treatment with TAF.

Effectiveness and safety of tenofovir amibufenamide in chronic hepatitis B patients

This letter to the editor relates to the study entitled“Tenofovir amibufenamide vs tenofovir alafenamide for treating chronic hepatitis B:A real-world study”,which was recently published by Peng et al.Hepatitis B virus infection represents a significant health burden worldwide and can lead to cirrhosis and even liver cancer.The antiviral drugs currently used to treat patients with chronic hepatitis B infection still have many side effects,so it is crucial to identify safe and effective drugs to inhibit viral replication.

Factors Associated with Renal Impairment in Patients on Tenofovir for Chronic Hepatitis B in Yaoundé (Cameroon)

Background: Tenofovir (TFV) is widely used to treat patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. But kidney abnormalities are the main concern using this drug. Few studies have described the renal impairment due to the TFV in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in Sub-Saharan Africa. The objective was to evaluate factors associated with renal impairment observed in patients on TFV for CHB. Method: It was a hospital based cross sectional prospective study carried out from June 2023 to July 2023 in Yaoundé (Cameroon) and included any patient treated with TFV for CHB during at least a period of 6 months. For each participant, we collected in the medical report socio-demographic data, clinical data, baseline creatinine, treatment information (type of TFV which was Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) or Alafenamide (TAF), duration). Then, we collected blood samples to measure serum creatinine and phosphate levels and urine dipstick analysis. Factors associated with renal impairment were assessed with the Odds Ratio. A p value of Results: A total of 60 participants were included. The median age was 44 years [36-55] and median duration of TFV therapy was 17.5 months [11.7-25.7]. The prevalence of reduced eGFR (Conclusion: Kidney function was impaired in some patients receiving TFV for CHB. It should be monitored, particularly after 36 months and for those receiving TDF prodrug.

Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection: Biological Parameters in Patients Treated with Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate

Chronic hepatitis B causes a liver disease characterized by inflammation of the liver parenchyma. The aim of this study was to investigate the evolution of biological parameters in patients treated with Tenofovir for chronic B infection at the Commune V referral health center in Bamako. We obtained a prevalence of 14.15%. The most represented age group was 31 - 40 years, with 36.8%. The sex ratio was 1.44 in favour of men. Viral load was undetectable after 18 months of treatment in 25 patients (42.37%). Tenofovir, the 1st-line drug in Mali, is effective on the biological parameters monitored in patients.

Review on article of effects of tenofovir alafenamide and entecavir in chronic hepatitis B virus patients

This letter comments on the article which reported that tenofovir alafenamide may increase blood lipid levels compared with entecavir in patients with chronic hepatitis B published on World J Hepatol 2023 August 27.We review the related research content,topic selection,methodology,conclusions,strengths and weaknesses of this article.And evaluate it in relation to other published relevant articles.

Tenofovir amibufenamide vs tenofovir alafenamide for treating chronic hepatitis B:A real-world study

BACKGROUND The efficacy and safety profile of tenofovir amibufenamide(TMF)in chronic hepatitis B(CHB)patients is not well-established.AIM To compare the efficacy and safety of TMF and tenofovir alafenamide(TAF)over a 48-wk period in patients with CHB.METHODS A total of 215 subjects meeting the inclusion criteria were enrolled and divided into two groups:TMF group(n=106)and the TAF group(n=109).The study included a comparison of virological response(VR):Undetectable hepatitis B virus DNA levels,alanine transaminase(ALT)normalization rates,renal function parameters,and blood lipid profiles.RESULTS At 24 and 48 wk,VR rates for the TMF group were 53.57%and 78.57%,respectively,compared with 48.31%and 78.65%for the TAF group(P>0.05).The VR rates were also similar in both groups among patients with low-level viremia,both hepatitis B e antigen(HBeAg)-positive and HBeAg-negative subgroups.The TMF cohort showed ALT normalization and renal safety profiles similar to the TAF group.There was a notable increase in total cholesterol levels in the TAF group(P=0.045),which was not observed in the TMF group(P>0.05).In patients with liver cirrhosis,both groups exhibited comparable VR and ALT normalization rates and renal safety profiles.However,the fibrosis 4 score at 48 wk showed a significant reduction in the TAF group as compared to the TMF group within the liver cirrhosis subgroup.CONCLUSION Our study found TMF is as effective as TAF in treating CHB and has a comparable safety profile.However,TAF may be associated with worsening lipid profiles.

Tenofovir alafenamide significantly increased serum lipid levels compared with entecavir therapy in chronic hepatitis B virus patients

BACKGROUND Tenofovir alafenamide(TAF)has a serum lipid-raising effect in patients with HIV;however,its effect on serum lipids and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease(NAFLD)risk in patients with chronic hepatitis B(CHB)is unclear.AIM To compare the effects of TAF and entecavir(ETV)on serum lipid levels in patients with CHB.METHODS In this retrospective cohort study,the data including the clinical features,serum lipids,and metabolic factors of patients with CHB at baseline and approximately 1 year after TAF or ETV treatment were collected and analyzed.We used propensity score-matched models to assess the effects on high-density lipoprotein,lowdensity lipoprotein,triglycerides,and total cholesterol(TCHO).RESULTS A total of 336 patients(75.60%male)were included;63.69%received TAF and 36.31%received ETV.Compared with the ETV group,the TAF group had significantly higher TCHO levels after treatment(4.67±0.90 vs 4.36±1.05,P=0.006).In a propensity score-matched model for body mass index,age,sex,smoking,drinking,presence of comorbidities such as NAFLD,cirrhosis,diabetes mellitus,and hypertension,TAF-treated patients had significantly increased TCHO levels compared to that at baseline(P=0.019).There was no difference for the ETV group.Body mass index,sex,hypertension,baseline TCHO,and creatine kinase-MB isoenzyme levels were significantly associated with elevated TCHO levels in logistic regression analysis.However,1-year TAF treatment did not increase the incidence of NAFLD.CONCLUSION A greater increase in TCHO was observed in patients with CHB receiving TAF compared to those receiving ETV.However,TAF-induced dyslipidemia did not increase the incidence of NAFLD.

Efficacy and safety of tenofovir alafenamide in patients with chronic hepatitis B exhibiting suboptimal response to entecavir

BACKGROUND Entecavir(ETV)is a potent and safe antiviral agent for patients with chronic hepatitis B(CHB);however,some patients may exhibit suboptimal response or resistance to ETV.Tenofovir alafenamide(TAF)is a novel tenofovir prodrug with improved pharmacokinetics and reduced renal and bone toxicity compared with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.AIM To evaluate the efficacy and safety of switching from ETV to TAF in patients with CHB exhibiting suboptimal response to ETV.METHODS A total of 60 patients with CHB who had been treated with ETV for at least 12 mo and had persistent or recurrent viremia[Hepatitis B virus(HBV)DNA≥20 IU/mL]or partial virologic response(HBV DNA<20 IU/mL,but detectable)were enrolled in the study.The patients were randomly assigned to either continue ETV(0.5 mg)daily or switch to TAF(25 mg)daily for 48 wk.The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved a virologic response(HBV DNA level<20 IU/mL)at week 48.Secondary endpoints included changes in serum alanine aminotransferase(ALT),hepatitis B surface antigen(HBsAg),hepatitis B e antigen(HBeAg),and anti-HBe levels,and renal and bone safety parameters.RESULTS At week 48,the proportion of patients who achieved a virologic response was significantly higher in the TAF group than in the ETV group(93.3%vs 66.7%,P=0.012).The mean reduction in HBV DNA from baseline was also significantly greater in the TAF group than in the ETV group(-3.8 vs-2.4 Log10 IU/mL,P<0.001).The rates of ALT normalization,HBeAg loss,HBeAg seroconversion,and HBsAg loss were not found to significantly differ between the two groups.None of the patients developed genotypic resistance to ETV or TAF.Both drugs were well tolerated,with no serious adverse events or discontinuations caused by adverse events.No significant changes were observed in the estimated glomerular filtration rate,serum creatinine level,or urine protein-to-creatinine ratio in either group.The TAF group had a significantly lower decrease in bone mineral density at the lumbar spine and hip than the ETV group(-0.8%vs-2.1%,P=0.004;-0.6%vs-1.8%,P=0.007,respectively).CONCLUSION Switching from ETV to TAF is effective and safe for patients with CHB exhibiting a suboptimal response to ETV and may prevent further viral resistance and reduce renal and bone toxicity.

Efficacy of tenofovir alafenamide in treatment of hepatitis B virus:A meta-analysis and non-inferiority evaluation

Objective:To evaluate the effect of tenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate on antiviral efficacy in patients with hepatitis B virus infection.Methods:Randomized controlled trials were searched on CNKI,Wanfang,VIP,China Biomedical Literature Database,PubMed,Cochrane Library,Embase,ClinicalKey,Chinese Clinical Trial Registry and ClinicalTrials.gov from the date of inception to April 2020.The literature was screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria,and the efficacy evaluation index of the included RCT was set as the success rate of reaching the endpoint of viral suppression and achieving normalized ALT values at 48 weeks of treatment.Intentionality analysis was adopted and the analysis results were taken as the final conclusion.RevMan 5.3 software was used for this Meta-analysis.Meanwhile,VassarStats was used to evaluate the non-inferiority of TAF and calculate the difference of virus inhibition efficiency rate and 95%confidence interval between experimental group and the control group of each RCT.Results:After the literature search,411 potential articles were found,5 studies were finally included according to the criteria,and 2,120 patients were included.Intentionality analysis showed that TAF regimen and TDF regimen had similar viral suppression success rates(RR=0.97,95%CI:0.94~1.01,P=0.19).The ALT normalization rate in the TAF treatment group was higher than that in the TDF treatment group,and the difference was statistically significant(RR=1.35,95%CI:1.20-1.53,P<0.00001).The non-inferiority margin was set at 10%,and it was found that three RCT studies in the international multi-center all showed that TAF was not inferior to TDF in controlling HBV viral load,while two RCT studies in China's Mainland failed to achieve non-inferiority after calculation.Conclusions:At 48 weeks of treatment,TAF was similar to TDF in controlling HBV viral load.However,the efficacy of TAF in controlling HBV viral load may vary among different populations,which requires further confirmation by more clinical trial evidence.Based on AASLD criteria,the ALT normalization rate of the TAF group was higher than that of the TDF group at 48 weeks of treatment,showing an obvious advantage.

Tenofovir rescue therapy in pregnant females with chronic hepatitis B

AIM:To evaluate the safety and efficacy of tenofovir monotherapy in pregnant females resistant to lamivudine or telbivudine.The effect of tenofovir on the fetus was also assessed.METHODS:The clinical data of 17 females were reviewed in this study.Adverse events and pregnancy outcomes from January 1,2011 to June 30,2013 were evaluated in the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of BeijingDitan Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing,China.These pregnant females developed lamivudine(LAM)-or telbivudine(Ld T)-resistant chronic hepatitis B and received tenofovir(TDF)therapy(300 mg/d),and its curative effect,maternal and perinatal adverse events,fetal growth and development,and neonatal prognosis were evaluated.RESULTS:The median hepatitis B virus(HBV)DNA level in the pregnant females with LAM or Ld T resistance was 5.9(range,4.2-7.2)log10 copies/m L before the initiation of TDF.Ten of these females had abnormal alanine aminotransferase(ALT)levels.The patients were treated with TDF for a median of 24 wk(range,12-40 wk).Fourteen females(82.4%)had an HBV DNA level of<500 copies/m L at the time of delivery.This decrease was statistically significant(P<0.0001).Serum ALT levels were normalized in all subjects with an elevated serum ALT level at baseline(P=0.0003).There were no significant changes in serum creatinine and phosphorus levels during TDF treatment.In addition,no adverse events related to TDF treatment were observed.Seventeen females delivered 17 live infants,and all infants had good Apgar scores.The mean birth weight was 3226.5±331.7 g,and the mean length at birth was 50.4±1.1 cm.The growth and development of the infants was normal at birth,and no infants had birth defects related to TDF treatment.Eleven infants completed HBV vaccination and had no evidence of vertical transmission.CONCLUSION:The use of TDF in pregnant females with chronic HBV and LAM or Ld T resistance was safe and effective.

Efficacy and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in pregnancy for the prevention of vertical transmission of HBV infection

AIM:To evaluate the effects of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate(TDF)use during late pregnancy to reduce hepatitis B virus(HBV)transmission in highly viremic mothers.METHODS:This retrospective study included 45 pregnant patients with hepatitis B e antigen(+)chronic hepatitis B and HBV DNA levels>107copies/mL who received TDF 300 mg/d from week 18 to 27 of gestation(n=21).Untreated pregnant patients served as controls(n =24).All infants received 200 IU of hepatitis B immune globulin(HBIG)within 24 h postpartum and 20μg of recombinant HBV vaccine at 4,8,and 24 wk.Perinatal transmission rate was determined by hepatitis B surface antigen and HBV DNA results in infants at week 28.RESULTS:At week 28,none of the infants of TDFtreated mothers had immunoprophylaxis failure,whereas2(8.3%)of the infants of control mothers had immunoprophylaxis failure(P=0.022).There were no differences between the groups in terms of adverse events in mothers or congenital deformities,gestational age,height,or weight in infants.At postpartum week 28,significantly more TDF-treated mothers had levels of HBV DNA<250 copies/mL and normalized alanine aminotransferase compared with controls(62%vs none,P<0.001;82%vs 61%,P=0.012,respectively).CONCLUSION:TDF therapy during the second or third trimester reduced perinatal transmission rates of HBV and no adverse events were observed in mothers or infants.

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate is superior to lamivudine plus adefovir in lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients

AIM:To assess the efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate(TDF) in lamivudine(LAM)-resistant patients with a suboptimal response to LAM plus adefovir(ADV).METHODS:We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy of switching to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in suboptimal responders to lamivudine plus adefovir.Charts were reviewed for LAM-resistant chronic hepatitis B(CHB) patients who visited the Zhejiang Province People's Hospital and The First Affiliated Hospital,College of Medicine,Zhejiang University,from June 2009 to May 2013.Patients whose serum hepatitis B virus(HBV) DNA remained detectable despite at least 6 mo of LAM plus ADV combination therapy were included.Patients with a suboptimal response to LAM plus ADV were randomized to switch to TDF monotherapy(300 mg/d orally; TDF group) or to continuation with LAM(100 mg/d orally) plus ADV(10 mg/d orally; LAM plus ADV group) and were followed for 48 wk.Serum HBV DNA was determined at baseline and weeks 4,12,24,36,and 48.HBV serological markers and biochemistry were assessed at baseline and weeks 12,24,and 48.Resistance surveillance and side effects were monitored during therapy.RESULTS:Fifty-nine patient were randomized to switch to TDF(n =28) or continuation with LAM plus ADV(n =31).No significant differences were found between the groups at baseline.Prior to TDF therapy,all patients had been exposed to LAM plus ADV for a median of 11 mo(range:6-24 mo).No difference was seen in baseline serum HBV DNA between the two groups [5.13 ± 1.08 log10 copies/m L(TDF) vs 5.04 ± 31.16 log10 copies/m L(LAM +ADV),P =0.639].There was no significant difference in the rates of achieving complete virological response(CVR) at week 4 between the TDF and LAM +ADV groups(17.86% vs 6.45%,P =0.24).The rate of achieving CVR in the TDF and LAM plus ADV groups was 75% vs 16.13% at week 12,82.14% vs 22.58% at week 24,89.29% vs 25.81% at week 36,and 96.43% vs 29.03% at week 48,respectively(P < 0.001).The rate of alanine aminotransferase normalization was significantly higher in the TDF than in the LAM plus ADV group at week 12(75% vs17.86%,P < 0.001),but not at week 24(78.57% vs 54.84%,P =0.097) or 48(89.26% vs 67.74%,P =0.062).Patients were hepatitis B e antigen(HBe Ag) positive at baseline.There was no significant difference in HBe Ag negativity between the TDF and LAM plus ADV groups at week 48(4% vs 0%,P =0.481).There were no drug-related adverse effects at week 48 in either group.CONCLUSION:Switching to TDF monotherapy was superior to continuous add-on therapy in patients with LAM-resistant CHB with a suboptimal response to LAM plus ADV.

Safety and efficacy of tenofovir in chronic hepatitis B-related decompensated cirrhosis

AIM To evaluate the safety and efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate(TDF) as a first-line therapy in decompensated liver disease. METHODS We enrolled 174 chronic hepatitis B-related liver cirrhosis patients treated with 300 mg/d TDF at six Korean centers. Of the 174 cirrhosis patients, 57 were assigned to the decompensated cirrhosis group and 117 were assigned to the compensated cirrhosis group. We followed the patients for 12 mo and evaluated clinical outcomes, including biochemical, virological, and serological responses. We also evaluated changes in hepatic and renal function and compared the decompensated and compensated cirrhosis groups. RESULTS The 1-year complete virological response(CVR) and Hepatitis B e antigen(HBe Ag) seroconversion were seen in 70.2% and 14.2% in the decompensated cirrhosis group, respectively. The rates of HBe Ag seroconversion/loss and ALT normalization at month 12 were similar in both groups. TDF treatment was also effective for decreasing the level of hepatitis B virus(HBV) DNA in both groups, but CVR was higher in the compensated group(88.9% vs 70.2%, P = 0.005). Tenofovir treatment for 12 mo resulted in improved Child-Turcotte-Pugh(CTP) and model for end-stage liver disease(MELD) scores in decompensated group(P < 0.001). Of the 57 decompensated patients, 39(68.4%) achieved CTP class A and 27(49.1%) showed improvement in the CTP score of 2 points after 12 mo of TDF. The observed rate of confirmed 0.5 mg/d L increases in serum levels of creatinine in the decompensated and compensated cirrhosis group were 7.0% and 2.5%, respectively(P < 1.000).CONCLUSION TDF therapy in decompensated cirrhosis patients was effective for decreasing HBV DNA levels and improving hepatic function with relatively lower CVR than in compensated cirrhosis. Thus, physicians should carefully monitor not only renal function but also treatment responses when using TDF in decompensated cirrhosis patients.

Tenofovir vs lamivudine plus adefovir in chronic hepatitis B:TENOSIMP-B study

AIM To demonstrate the non-inferiority(15% non-inferiority limit) of monotherapy with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate(TDF) vs the combination of lamivudine(LAM) plus adefovir dipivoxil(ADV) in the maintenance of virologic response in patients with chronic hepatitis B(CHB) and prior failure with LAM.METHODS This study was a Phase IV prospective, randomized, open, controlled study with 2 parallel groups(TDF and LAM+ADV) of adult patients with hepatitis B e antigen(HBe Ag)-negative CHB, prior failure with LAM, on treatment with LAM+ADV for at least 6 mo, without prior resistance to ADV and with an undetectable viral load at the start of the study, in 14 Spanish hospitals. The follow-up time for each patient was 48 wk after randomization, with quarterly visits in which the viral load, biochemical and serological parameters, adverse effects, adherence to treatment and consumption of hospital resources were analysed.RESULTS Forty-six patients were evaluated [median age: 55.4 years(30.2-75.2); 84.8% male], including 22 patients with TDF and 24 with LAM+ADV. During study development, hepatitis B virus DNA(HBV-DNA) remained undetectable, all patients remained HBe Ag negative, and hepatitis B surface antigen(HBs Ag) positive. Alanine aminotransferase(ALT) values at the end of the study were similar in the 2 groups(25.1± 7.65, TDF vs 24.22 ± 8.38, LAM+ADV, P = 0.646). No significant changes were observed in creatinine or serum phosphorus values in either group. No significant differences between the 2 groups were noted in the identification of adverse effects(AEs)(53.8%, TDF vs 37.5%, LAM+ADV, P = 0.170), and none of the AEs which occurred were serious. Treatment adherence was 95.5% and 83.3% in the TDF and the LAM+ADV groups, respectively(P = 0.488). The costs associated with hospital resource consumption were significantly lower with the TDF treatment than the LAM+ADV treatment(€4943 ± 1059 vs €5811 ± 1538, respectively, P < 0.001).CONCLUSION TDF monotherapy proved to be safe and not inferior to the LAM+ADV combination therapy in maintaining virologic response in patients with CHB and previous LAM failure. In addition, the use of TDF generated a significant savings in hospital costs.

Comparison of renal safety of tenofovir and entecavir in patients with chronic hepatitis B: Systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND Recently, the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease suggested no preference between tenofovir(TDF) and entecavir(ETV) regarding potential long-term risks of renal complications. Over the years, renal safety has become a critical concern in nucleos(t)ide analog-treated patients due to the long-term use of these drugs. However, existing studies do not show significant differences in renal dysfunction between these two drugs. Further, there is a paucity of studies comparing the long-term renal effects of TDF and ETV.AIM To investigate the effects of TDF and ETV on renal function, we performed systematic review and meta-analysis.METHODS Two investigators independently searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Embase databases for randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies(NRSs) using the keywords 'CHB', 'Tenofovir', and 'Entecavir', and additional references were obtained from the bibliographies of relevant articles published through December 2017. The quality of each study was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment,Development and Evaluation criteria. The primary outcome was the change in serum creatinine level in the TDF and ETV groups at baseline, 6 mo, 12 mo and24 mo.RESULTSNine NRSs comprising 2263 participants met the inclusion criteria. Changes in creatinine levels were higher in the TDF group than in the ETV group at 6 mo[mean difference(MD) = 0.03 mg/dL;95%CI: 0.02-0.04;I2 = 0%], 12 mo(MD =0.05 mg/dL;95%CI: 0.02-0.08;I2 = 78%), and 24 mo(MD = 0.07 mg/dL;95%CI:0.01-0.13;I2 = 93%). The change in estimated glomerular filtration rate(eGFR) was significantly higher in the TDF group than in the ETV group at 6 mo[standardized mean difference(SMD),-0.22;95%Cl:-0.36--0.08;I2 = 0%], 12 mo(SMD =-0.24;95%Cl:-0.43--0.05;I2 = 50%), and 24 mo(-0.35;95%Cl:-0.61--0.09;I2= 67%).CONCLUSION TDF statistically significantly increased serum creatinine levels and decreased the eGFR in 6-24 mo compared to ETV, with moderate to low quality of evidence.However, the differences are negligible.

Tenofovir rescue therapy for chronic hepatitis B patients after multiple treatment failures

AIM:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate(TDF) for chronic hepatitis B(CHB) patients after multiple failures.METHODS:A total of 29 CHB patients who had a suboptimal response or developed resistance to two or more previous nucleoside/nucleotide analogue(NA) treatments were included.Study subjects were treated with TDF alone(n = 13) or in combination with lamivudine(LAM,n = 12) or entecavir(ETV,n = 4) for ≥ 6 mo.Complete virologic response(CVR) was defined as an achievement of serum hepatitis B virus(HBV) DNA level ≤ 60 IU/mL by real-time polymerase chain reaction method during treatment.Safety assessment was based on serum creatinine and phosphorus level.Eleven patients had histories of LAM and adefovir dipivoxil(ADV) treatment and 18 patients were exposed to LAM,ADV,and ETV.Twenty-seven patients(93.1%) were hepatitis B e antigen(HBeAg) positive and the mean value of the baseline serum HBV DNA level was 5.5 log IU/mL ± 1.7 log IU/mL.The median treatment duration was 16 mo(range 7 to 29 mo).RESULTS:All the patients had been treated with LAM and developed genotypic and phenotypic resistance to it.Resistance to ADV was present in 7 patients and 10 subjects had a resistance to ETV.One patient had a resistance to both ADV and ETV.The cumulative probabilities of CVR at 12 and 24 mo of TDF containing treatment regimen calculated by the Kaplan Meier method were 86.2% and 96.6%,respectively.Although one patient failed to achieve CVR,serum HBV DNA level decreased by 3.9 log IU/mL from the baseline and the last serum HBV DNA level during treatment was 85 IU/mL,achieving near CVR.No patients in this study showed viral breakthrough or primary non-response during the follow-up period.The cumulative probability of HBeAg clearance in the 27 HBeAg positive patients was 7.4%,12%,and 27% at 6,12,and 18 mo of treatment,respectively.Treatment efficacy of TDF containing regimen was not statistically different according to the presence of specific HBV mutations.History of prior exposure to specific antiviral agents did not make a difference to treatment outcome.Treatment efficacy of TDF was not affected by combination therapy with LAM or ETV.No patient developed renal toxicity and no cases of hypophosphatemia associated with TDF therapy were observed.There were no other adverse events related to TDF therapy observed in the study subjects.CONCLUSION:TDF can be an effective and safe rescue therapy in CHB patients after multiple NA therapy failures.

Development of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate resistance after complete viral suppression in a patient with treatment-na?ve chronic hepatitis B: A case report and review of the literature

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate(TDF) is a potent nucleo-tide analogue that is recommended as first-line therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis B. The results of a longitudinal study of TDF treatment demonstrated no development of resistance. We observed one treatment-na?ve chronic hepatitis B(CHB) patient who developed TDF resistance after complete viral suppression during long-term TDF treatment. A 37-year-old HBe Ag-positive man received TDF 300 mg/d for 43 mo. The hepatitis B virus(HBV) DNA titer was 8 log_(10) copies/m L at baseline and became undetectable at 16 mo after treatment. However, the HBV DNA titer rebounded to 7.5 log_(10) copies/m L at 43 mo after treatment. We performed full sequencing to find mutation sites associated with virologic breakthrough. The results showed 9 mutation sites, most of which had not been well-known as mutation sites. We changed the therapy from tenofovir to entecavir with a regimen of 0.5 mg once daily. After 4 mo, the HBV DNA titer decreased to 267 copies/m L, and the liver enzyme levels were normalized.

Similar efficacy and safety of tenofovir in Asians and non-Asians with chronic hepatitis B

AIM:To compare the efficacy and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate(TDF)in Asian and non-Asian chronic hepatitis B(CHB)patients.METHODS:The efficacy and safety of the initial 48wk of treatment with TDF was compared in a posthoc analysis of combined data from 217 Asians and299 non-Asians included in Studies 102 and 103and a post-approval,open-label trial(Study 123).Patient groups were compared according to baseline hepatitis B e antigen(HBe Ag)status and viral load.The main outcome measures included the proportion of patients who achieved a hepatitis B virus(HBV)DNA level<400 copies/m L at Week 48 of treatment.Secondary measures included:HBV DNA and alanine aminotransaminase(ALT)levels over time;proportion of patients with normal ALT levels;proportion of patients with HBe Ag loss/seroconversion and proportion of patients with hepatitis B surface antigen loss/seroconversion;changes in liver histology.Safety and tolerability were evaluated by the occurrence of adverse events(AEs),serious AEs,laboratory abnormalities,discontinuation of the study drug due to AEs,or death.The primary efficacy and safety analysis set included all patients who were randomly assigned to treatment and received at least one dose of study drug.RESULTS:At week 48,similar proportions of Asians and non-Asians reached HBV DNA<400 copies/m L(96%of Asian and 97%of non-Asian patients with HBe Ag-negative CHB and 83%of Asian and 79%of non-Asian patients with HBe Ag-positive CHB had HBV DNA)and normal ALT(78%of Asian and 81%of nonAsian patients with HBe Ag-negative CHB and 71%of Asian and 74%of non-Asian patients with HBe Agpositive CHB had normal ALT).On-treatment HBV DNA decline rates were similar between Asians and nonAsians regardless of baseline HBe Ag status and viralload.HBV DNA decline during the first four weeks was2.9 log10 copies/m L in HBe Ag-negative Asians and nonAsians,and in HBe Ag-positive non-Asians,and 3.1log10 copies/m L in HBe Ag-positive Asians.HBe Ag loss and seroconversion was achieved in 14%of Asians vs 26%and 24%,respectively,in non-Asians.Liver histology improved in 77.2%of Asians and 71.5%of non-Asians.No resistance to TDF developed.No renal safety signals were observed.CONCLUSION:TDF demonstrated similar viral suppression,normalization of ALT,improvements in liver fibrosis,and no detectable resistance in Asian and non-Asian patients regardless of baseline HBe Ag status.

Efficacy and safety of tenofovir in chronic hepatitis B: Australian real world experience

AIMTo evaluate the long-term treatment outcomes of tenofovir therapy in patients in a real world Australian tertiary care setting. METHODSWe performed a retrospective analysis of treatment outcomes among treatment-na&iuml;ve and treatment-experienced patients receiving a minimum 3 mo tenofovir therapy through St Vincent&rsquo;s Hospital Melbourne, Australia. We included patients receiving tenofovir [tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)] monotherapy, as well as patients treated with TDF in combination with a second antiviral agent. Patients were excluded if they demonstrated human immune-deficiency virus/hepatitis C virus/hepatitis delta virus coinfection or were less than 18 years of age. We considered virological and biochemical response, as well as safety outcomes. Virological response was determined by measurement of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA using sensitive assays; biochemical response was determined via serum liver function tests; histological response was determined from liver biopsy and fibroscan; safety analysis focused on glomerular renal function and bone mineral density. The primary efficacy endpoint was complete virological suppression over time, defined by HBV DNA RESULTSNinety-two patients were identified who fulfilled the enrolment criteria. Median follow-up was 26 mo (range 3-114). Mean age was 46 (24-78) years, 64 (70%) were male and 77 (84%) were of Asian origin. 55 (60%) patients were treatment-na&iuml;ve and 62 patients (67%) were HBeAg-negative. Complete virological suppression was achieved by 45/65 (71%) patients at 12 mo, 37/46 (80%) at 24 mo and 25/28 (89%) at 36 mo. Partial virological response (HBV DNA 20-2000 IU/mL) was achieved by 89/92 (96.7%) of patients. Multivariate analysis showed a significant relationship between virological suppression at end of follow-up and baseline HBV DNA level (OR = 0.897, 95%CI: 0.833-0.967, P = 0.0046) and HBeAg positive status (OR = 0.373, 95%CI: 0.183-0.762, P = 0.0069). There was no difference in response comparing treatment-na&iuml;ve and treatment-experienced patients. Three episodes of virological breakthrough occurred in the setting of non-compliance. Tenofovir therapy was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONTenofovir is an efficacious, safe and well-tolerated treatment in an Australian real-world tertiary care setting. Our data are similar to the reported experience from registration trials.