To establish a classification on the basis of genetic linguistics requires two indispensible conditions: common retention, including cognate lexical retention and cognate morphological retention, and common innovation...To establish a classification on the basis of genetic linguistics requires two indispensible conditions: common retention, including cognate lexical retention and cognate morphological retention, and common innovation in a language group. The first condition is primary, and is the motivation for classification and the evidence of a genetic relationship. The second condition is secondary and supportive, and is the feature,approach and sign of a language group. This article focuses on common innovations in the Sino-Tibetan language family. Tone, voiceless aspirated stops, affricates, classifiers, noun prefixes for kinship and overlap are six common innovations that are proposed for defining the Sino-Tibetan language family.展开更多
目的系统评价家庭干预对语言发育迟缓/语言障碍儿童的干预效果。方法检索PUBMED、Web of Science、中国知网、维普、万方等数据库中有关家庭干预治疗儿童语言发育迟缓/语言障碍的对照研究文献,采用STATA 15.0软件对主要结局指标进行met...目的系统评价家庭干预对语言发育迟缓/语言障碍儿童的干预效果。方法检索PUBMED、Web of Science、中国知网、维普、万方等数据库中有关家庭干预治疗儿童语言发育迟缓/语言障碍的对照研究文献,采用STATA 15.0软件对主要结局指标进行meta合并分析。结果共检索文献2430篇,经筛选最终纳入符合标准的文献22篇,包含被试1472例,Meta分析结果显示:(1)家庭干预后语言发育迟缓/语言障碍儿童的语言发育商(P<0.001)、语言接受能力(P<0.001)、语言表达能力(P<0.001)均较干预前明显提高(;2)家庭干预相对于传统语言康复训练以及无干预对照组有明显优势(P<0.05)。结论家庭干预应用于语言发育迟缓/语言障碍儿童效果显著,能够有效提升儿童的语言水平和交流能力。展开更多
目的探究家庭互动式阅读对1~6岁语言发育迟缓(language development delay,LDD)患儿语言康复的作用。方法随机数字表法将本院2020年4月~2021年6月就诊的85例1~6岁LDD患儿分为研究组43例与对照组42例,对照组给予药物干预和康复训练,研究...目的探究家庭互动式阅读对1~6岁语言发育迟缓(language development delay,LDD)患儿语言康复的作用。方法随机数字表法将本院2020年4月~2021年6月就诊的85例1~6岁LDD患儿分为研究组43例与对照组42例,对照组给予药物干预和康复训练,研究组在对照组基础上加以家庭互动式阅读。干预3个月后评价疗效及家长满意度,干预前后Gesell发育量表(gesell developmental test scales,GDS)调查。结果研究组总有效率83.72%,显著高于对照组61.90%(P<0.05)。干预后两组GDS量表各行为发育商(development quotient,DQ)评分比干预前均显著提升,且研究组显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。干预后研究组患儿家长对康复效果、专业水平、服务态度、人文关怀评分及总分均显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论家庭互动式阅读有利于1~6岁LDD患儿语言、运动行为改善,家长满意度高。展开更多
文摘To establish a classification on the basis of genetic linguistics requires two indispensible conditions: common retention, including cognate lexical retention and cognate morphological retention, and common innovation in a language group. The first condition is primary, and is the motivation for classification and the evidence of a genetic relationship. The second condition is secondary and supportive, and is the feature,approach and sign of a language group. This article focuses on common innovations in the Sino-Tibetan language family. Tone, voiceless aspirated stops, affricates, classifiers, noun prefixes for kinship and overlap are six common innovations that are proposed for defining the Sino-Tibetan language family.
文摘目的系统评价家庭干预对语言发育迟缓/语言障碍儿童的干预效果。方法检索PUBMED、Web of Science、中国知网、维普、万方等数据库中有关家庭干预治疗儿童语言发育迟缓/语言障碍的对照研究文献,采用STATA 15.0软件对主要结局指标进行meta合并分析。结果共检索文献2430篇,经筛选最终纳入符合标准的文献22篇,包含被试1472例,Meta分析结果显示:(1)家庭干预后语言发育迟缓/语言障碍儿童的语言发育商(P<0.001)、语言接受能力(P<0.001)、语言表达能力(P<0.001)均较干预前明显提高(;2)家庭干预相对于传统语言康复训练以及无干预对照组有明显优势(P<0.05)。结论家庭干预应用于语言发育迟缓/语言障碍儿童效果显著,能够有效提升儿童的语言水平和交流能力。
文摘目的探究家庭互动式阅读对1~6岁语言发育迟缓(language development delay,LDD)患儿语言康复的作用。方法随机数字表法将本院2020年4月~2021年6月就诊的85例1~6岁LDD患儿分为研究组43例与对照组42例,对照组给予药物干预和康复训练,研究组在对照组基础上加以家庭互动式阅读。干预3个月后评价疗效及家长满意度,干预前后Gesell发育量表(gesell developmental test scales,GDS)调查。结果研究组总有效率83.72%,显著高于对照组61.90%(P<0.05)。干预后两组GDS量表各行为发育商(development quotient,DQ)评分比干预前均显著提升,且研究组显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。干预后研究组患儿家长对康复效果、专业水平、服务态度、人文关怀评分及总分均显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论家庭互动式阅读有利于1~6岁LDD患儿语言、运动行为改善,家长满意度高。
