期刊文献+
共找到1篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Ecological Footprint and Ecological Security Evaluation in the Upper Min River Basin 被引量:2
1
作者 TU Jian-jun 1, 2 1. School of Resources and Environment Science, Southwest China Normal University, Chongqing 400715, China 2. Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China 《Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences》 EI CAS 2005年第4期641-646,共6页
On the basis of the ecological footprint (EF) model, this paper studied theecological security in the Upper Min River Basin ecosystem. The result shows that with 2. 038 2 hm^2per capita ecological capacity (0. 422 2 h... On the basis of the ecological footprint (EF) model, this paper studied theecological security in the Upper Min River Basin ecosystem. The result shows that with 2. 038 2 hm^2per capita ecological capacity (0. 422 2 hm^2 higher than per capita EF) ,and 165 825 hm^2 ecologysurplus , the ecosystem in Upper Min River is generally secure at present. But the arable land isoverweighed and omens an eco-security crisis. Meanwhile, problems such as low forest coverage rate,severe loss of water and soil,enlargement of arid-valley area, frequent occurrence of mountainhazards and degradation of pastures have been major threats to the eco-security of this region. Thecalculation result of ten-thousand-yuan ( RMB) GDP shows that the use of natural resources isextensive, and there will be a rapid increase tendency of EF in the future. In order to maintain thepresent eco-security, the ways of use natural resources must be improved in the Upper Min RiverBasin. 展开更多
关键词 ecological security ecological footprint ecological capacity quantitativeevaluation the upper min river basin
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部