Student identity,their dichotomous logical framework,and teachers' beliefs constitute the major obstacles in conducting classroom discussion on controversial issues. This essay analyzes these obstacles and provide...Student identity,their dichotomous logical framework,and teachers' beliefs constitute the major obstacles in conducting classroom discussion on controversial issues. This essay analyzes these obstacles and provides suggestions for teachers in tackling the problems,so that classroom discussions on controversial issues may exert beneficial outcomes.展开更多
"四书"域外传播史是"中学西传"跨文化研究中的重要课题。结合"礼仪之争"这一时代背景,可对比利时来华耶稣会士卫方济的儒学译介成果进行梳理,重点关注他于1711年在布拉格出版的儒学典籍译著《中华帝国六..."四书"域外传播史是"中学西传"跨文化研究中的重要课题。结合"礼仪之争"这一时代背景,可对比利时来华耶稣会士卫方济的儒学译介成果进行梳理,重点关注他于1711年在布拉格出版的儒学典籍译著《中华帝国六经》(Sinensis Imperii Libri Classici Sex)。进而以该书《中庸》译文为例,比较卫氏译文与其他拉丁文译本之间的异同。一方面勾勒出16-18世纪来华耶稣会士对儒学典籍翻译与阐释的基本路径;另一方面着重探讨卫氏译文的独特之处及个中缘由。展开更多
文摘Student identity,their dichotomous logical framework,and teachers' beliefs constitute the major obstacles in conducting classroom discussion on controversial issues. This essay analyzes these obstacles and provides suggestions for teachers in tackling the problems,so that classroom discussions on controversial issues may exert beneficial outcomes.
文摘"四书"域外传播史是"中学西传"跨文化研究中的重要课题。结合"礼仪之争"这一时代背景,可对比利时来华耶稣会士卫方济的儒学译介成果进行梳理,重点关注他于1711年在布拉格出版的儒学典籍译著《中华帝国六经》(Sinensis Imperii Libri Classici Sex)。进而以该书《中庸》译文为例,比较卫氏译文与其他拉丁文译本之间的异同。一方面勾勒出16-18世纪来华耶稣会士对儒学典籍翻译与阐释的基本路径;另一方面着重探讨卫氏译文的独特之处及个中缘由。