As a Chinese English learner,it is really a hard part to recognize well the usage of he,she,and it in the spoken English.Since in Chinese,the pronunciation between he,she,and it is the same one:"ta".Just the...As a Chinese English learner,it is really a hard part to recognize well the usage of he,she,and it in the spoken English.Since in Chinese,the pronunciation between he,she,and it is the same one:"ta".Just the writing is different.However,in English,the meaning of he,she,it is totally different.Sometimes if people choose the wrong one,it is pretty possible to make some misunderstandings since the meaning will be different.展开更多
For the number of complete shock curves of a conservation law with one space variable,Hopf in 1950 for the Burger equation,and Oleinik in 1956 for the general,stated that it is at most countable.In 1979,the present au...For the number of complete shock curves of a conservation law with one space variable,Hopf in 1950 for the Burger equation,and Oleinik in 1956 for the general,stated that it is at most countable.In 1979,the present author published an example to show that the statement of Hopf and Oleinik is wrong.But after so long time,the wrong statement for countability still appeared in some publications,which is at least partly due to that some ones felt difficult to understand Hopf and Oleinik’s proofs being wrong.So,pointing out where they went wrong becomes very necessary.展开更多
文摘As a Chinese English learner,it is really a hard part to recognize well the usage of he,she,and it in the spoken English.Since in Chinese,the pronunciation between he,she,and it is the same one:"ta".Just the writing is different.However,in English,the meaning of he,she,it is totally different.Sometimes if people choose the wrong one,it is pretty possible to make some misunderstandings since the meaning will be different.
基金partially supported by National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No.2011CB302400)National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 10771206)
文摘For the number of complete shock curves of a conservation law with one space variable,Hopf in 1950 for the Burger equation,and Oleinik in 1956 for the general,stated that it is at most countable.In 1979,the present author published an example to show that the statement of Hopf and Oleinik is wrong.But after so long time,the wrong statement for countability still appeared in some publications,which is at least partly due to that some ones felt difficult to understand Hopf and Oleinik’s proofs being wrong.So,pointing out where they went wrong becomes very necessary.
