期刊文献+
共找到1篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
When and How the East-West Great Divergence Took Place: A Review from the Perspective of Technological Capability in Machine Tool Industry
1
作者 Peng Nansheng Yan Peng 《China Economist》 2013年第1期100-110,共11页
Kenneth Pomeranz and other members of the California School hold that China has lagged behind the West mainly because of the geographical distribution of its mineral resources. They emphasize that the Great Divergence... Kenneth Pomeranz and other members of the California School hold that China has lagged behind the West mainly because of the geographical distribution of its mineral resources. They emphasize that the Great Divergence between the East and the West began in very late 1800s. However, the emergence of steam engine, the symbol of the Industrial Revolution, is based on the technology accumulation and inheritance of machine tool industry in 16th century Western Europe. In contrast, China in the Ming Dynasty did not have similar machine tool technologies and even when such Western technologies were introduced to China in the late Ming Dynasty-along with clocks and firearms - they were not successfully grafted into Chinese technology tradition. Therefore, China lacked both the key technologies required for an Industrial Revolution and the capability to develop related technologies. The Great Divergence between the East and the West started in the 16th century and the West's technological capability in the heavy industry is the very advantage that brought it ahead of China. 展开更多
关键词 technology the great divergence heavy industry the California School
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部