Retaining the death penalty and strict restricting the application of the death penalty is now a basic criminal policy in China, and from the judicial level, the key to the restriction of the death penalty is to study...Retaining the death penalty and strict restricting the application of the death penalty is now a basic criminal policy in China, and from the judicial level, the key to the restriction of the death penalty is to study what lenient sentencing discretion the criminal has to constitute ＂not to execute immediately＂ when he has reached the standard of the immediate execution of the death penalty, to cross the chasm from the immediate execution of the death penalty to the death sentence with a reprieve. The basic process of the sentencing is to establish a baseline punishment on the basis of the social harmfulness of the activities of the criminal, and then measure the profits and losses according to the offender＇s personal danger. Therefore, although the social harmfulness of the activities of the criminal reaches the standard of the ＂most heinous crimes＂, due to the existence of the fault of the victim, active compensation for the victim, and the motives of the small blames and other lenient sentencing discretions, the criminal＇s danger has not reached the degree of ＂flagrance＂. Apply the death sentence with a two-year reprieve and even the life imprisonment generally. If there are some strict sentencing discretions, such as ＂the crime means is extremely cruel＂, carefully consider the use of the immediate execution of the death penalty. Under the circumstances of the concurrence of the sentencing, carry on the overall consideration based on the comprehensive measurement of various circumstances of the sentencing.展开更多
For the person violating prevention and control measures or has caused pollution, environment laws all set penalty provision. Moreover, for the person still does not improve within limited period, there is daily conse...For the person violating prevention and control measures or has caused pollution, environment laws all set penalty provision. Moreover, for the person still does not improve within limited period, there is daily consecutive penalty provision. For that legal properties of these daily consecutive penalty provisions are administrative order penalty or administrative execution penalty,judicial practice in Taiwan always has different views. The target of ＂daily consecutive penalty＇ is compelling doers to fulfill their obligations or improve illegal state by continuously increasing property burden of obligor. The emphasis is fulfilling future responsibility or improving future,but not punishing the past violations. To realize the target of com- pelling obligor to improve,we should take administrative compulsory execution means. So, for the property of daily consecutive penalty,we should cleady position daily consecutive penalty as administrative execution penalty,and not only its penalty target has difference with administrative order penalty, but also made way and law enforcement focus are different from administrative order penalty.展开更多
An International Seminar on Criminal Penalty Execution and Human Rights Protection was held in Kunming, capital of Yunnan Province from November 28-29, 2005. Sponsored by the Chinese Supreme People＇s Procuratorate, t...An International Seminar on Criminal Penalty Execution and Human Rights Protection was held in Kunming, capital of Yunnan Province from November 28-29, 2005. Sponsored by the Chinese Supreme People＇s Procuratorate, the UNDP, the Norway Parliament Administrative Supervisor＇s Office and the China International Economic and Technical Exchange Center of the Ministry of Commerce, the seminar was attended by more than 190 Chinese and foreign representatives from the International Prosecutors＇ Association,展开更多
区块链技术为刑罚变更执行数据的真实可信提供支撑,并实现各主体间的互信和高效协同.对权威证明共识算法(proof of authority, PoA)存在的制约因素进行分析并提出一种改进的动态加权权威证明算法(dynamic weighted proof of authority, ...区块链技术为刑罚变更执行数据的真实可信提供支撑,并实现各主体间的互信和高效协同.对权威证明共识算法(proof of authority, PoA)存在的制约因素进行分析并提出一种改进的动态加权权威证明算法(dynamic weighted proof of authority, DWPoA),进行刑罚变更执行提请共识.构建联盟链,基于Tangle结构提出一种链上共识算法,进行刑罚变更执行主体间的链上共识;基于(t,n)门限签名提出一种分布式预言机链下共识算法进行链上、链下共识,并对带宽占用率和共识时长进行仿真实验,分布式预言机链下共识算法更具优势.展开更多
文摘Retaining the death penalty and strict restricting the application of the death penalty is now a basic criminal policy in China, and from the judicial level, the key to the restriction of the death penalty is to study what lenient sentencing discretion the criminal has to constitute ＂not to execute immediately＂ when he has reached the standard of the immediate execution of the death penalty, to cross the chasm from the immediate execution of the death penalty to the death sentence with a reprieve. The basic process of the sentencing is to establish a baseline punishment on the basis of the social harmfulness of the activities of the criminal, and then measure the profits and losses according to the offender＇s personal danger. Therefore, although the social harmfulness of the activities of the criminal reaches the standard of the ＂most heinous crimes＂, due to the existence of the fault of the victim, active compensation for the victim, and the motives of the small blames and other lenient sentencing discretions, the criminal＇s danger has not reached the degree of ＂flagrance＂. Apply the death sentence with a two-year reprieve and even the life imprisonment generally. If there are some strict sentencing discretions, such as ＂the crime means is extremely cruel＂, carefully consider the use of the immediate execution of the death penalty. Under the circumstances of the concurrence of the sentencing, carry on the overall consideration based on the comprehensive measurement of various circumstances of the sentencing.
文摘For the person violating prevention and control measures or has caused pollution, environment laws all set penalty provision. Moreover, for the person still does not improve within limited period, there is daily consecutive penalty provision. For that legal properties of these daily consecutive penalty provisions are administrative order penalty or administrative execution penalty,judicial practice in Taiwan always has different views. The target of ＂daily consecutive penalty＇ is compelling doers to fulfill their obligations or improve illegal state by continuously increasing property burden of obligor. The emphasis is fulfilling future responsibility or improving future,but not punishing the past violations. To realize the target of com- pelling obligor to improve,we should take administrative compulsory execution means. So, for the property of daily consecutive penalty,we should cleady position daily consecutive penalty as administrative execution penalty,and not only its penalty target has difference with administrative order penalty, but also made way and law enforcement focus are different from administrative order penalty.
文摘An International Seminar on Criminal Penalty Execution and Human Rights Protection was held in Kunming, capital of Yunnan Province from November 28-29, 2005. Sponsored by the Chinese Supreme People＇s Procuratorate, the UNDP, the Norway Parliament Administrative Supervisor＇s Office and the China International Economic and Technical Exchange Center of the Ministry of Commerce, the seminar was attended by more than 190 Chinese and foreign representatives from the International Prosecutors＇ Association,
文摘区块链技术为刑罚变更执行数据的真实可信提供支撑,并实现各主体间的互信和高效协同.对权威证明共识算法(proof of authority, PoA)存在的制约因素进行分析并提出一种改进的动态加权权威证明算法(dynamic weighted proof of authority, DWPoA),进行刑罚变更执行提请共识.构建联盟链,基于Tangle结构提出一种链上共识算法,进行刑罚变更执行主体间的链上共识;基于(t,n)门限签名提出一种分布式预言机链下共识算法进行链上、链下共识,并对带宽占用率和共识时长进行仿真实验,分布式预言机链下共识算法更具优势.
