Purpose:Through combing the 40 years’history of the development of Chinese educational policy research,this article attempts to sort out the efforts and lessons learned by researchers in the field of education policy...Purpose:Through combing the 40 years’history of the development of Chinese educational policy research,this article attempts to sort out the efforts and lessons learned by researchers in the field of education policy in China.Design/Approach/Methods:As one of the earliest scholars engaged in the study of Chinese education policy,based on the academic publications,symposia,and thematic research,the author has found efforts in four directions in the field:proposals for policy-oriented research and research-oriented policy,disciplinization-based endeavors,empirical research on theory-guided educational policy,and guidance on major educational policy research topics and a think tank for educational policy decisions.Findings:This article argues that there is now a correspondence among the ideas,themes,forms,and frameworks of the educational reform promulgated by the government in recent years that have appeared in educational policy research,but there is no clear demarcation of what makes an educational policy researcher;no stable academic community has been formed that might strive together toward the foundation of a disciplinary paradigm,the rational organization of academic ideas,and the establishment and handing over of a theoretical framework to a succeeding generation.Originality/Value:This article takes a step back to claim that a paradigm for Chinese educational policy research is still nascent in the arduous process of formulation.展开更多
基于Web of Science核心数据库最近五年的数据,运用Cite Space软件的关键词、名词术语聚类与共被引分析功能,对美国研究者所做的教育现代化研究相关文献进行数据考察和可视化展示,并对定量数据进行定性分析,梳理出五年来美国教育现代化...基于Web of Science核心数据库最近五年的数据,运用Cite Space软件的关键词、名词术语聚类与共被引分析功能,对美国研究者所做的教育现代化研究相关文献进行数据考察和可视化展示,并对定量数据进行定性分析,梳理出五年来美国教育现代化研究具有的多学科、跨学科、国际化、实用化的外观特征。最新热点与前沿分析表明:美国教育现代化研究主要聚焦在以教育、医学健康、区域性为首的八个热点方向,并具有科学性坚持、国际性关注、实用性至上、历史性反思的研究特征。基于此,提出研究方法 (科学实证)、研究范畴(国际交流)、研究导向(注重实效)和研究视角(历史反思)四个方面的启示和建议。展开更多
文摘Purpose:Through combing the 40 years’history of the development of Chinese educational policy research,this article attempts to sort out the efforts and lessons learned by researchers in the field of education policy in China.Design/Approach/Methods:As one of the earliest scholars engaged in the study of Chinese education policy,based on the academic publications,symposia,and thematic research,the author has found efforts in four directions in the field:proposals for policy-oriented research and research-oriented policy,disciplinization-based endeavors,empirical research on theory-guided educational policy,and guidance on major educational policy research topics and a think tank for educational policy decisions.Findings:This article argues that there is now a correspondence among the ideas,themes,forms,and frameworks of the educational reform promulgated by the government in recent years that have appeared in educational policy research,but there is no clear demarcation of what makes an educational policy researcher;no stable academic community has been formed that might strive together toward the foundation of a disciplinary paradigm,the rational organization of academic ideas,and the establishment and handing over of a theoretical framework to a succeeding generation.Originality/Value:This article takes a step back to claim that a paradigm for Chinese educational policy research is still nascent in the arduous process of formulation.
文摘基于Web of Science核心数据库最近五年的数据,运用Cite Space软件的关键词、名词术语聚类与共被引分析功能,对美国研究者所做的教育现代化研究相关文献进行数据考察和可视化展示,并对定量数据进行定性分析,梳理出五年来美国教育现代化研究具有的多学科、跨学科、国际化、实用化的外观特征。最新热点与前沿分析表明:美国教育现代化研究主要聚焦在以教育、医学健康、区域性为首的八个热点方向,并具有科学性坚持、国际性关注、实用性至上、历史性反思的研究特征。基于此,提出研究方法 (科学实证)、研究范畴(国际交流)、研究导向(注重实效)和研究视角(历史反思)四个方面的启示和建议。
