BACKGROUND:This study aimed to investigate the risk factors and outcome of critically ill cancer patients with postoperative acute respiratory insufficiency.METHODS:The data of 190 critically ill cancer patients with ...BACKGROUND:This study aimed to investigate the risk factors and outcome of critically ill cancer patients with postoperative acute respiratory insufficiency.METHODS:The data of 190 critically ill cancer patients with postoperative acute respiratory insufficiency were retrospectively reviewed.The data of 321 patients with no acute respiratory insufficiency as controls were also collected.Clinical variables of the first 24 hours after admission to intensive care unit were collected,including age,sex,comorbid disease,type of surgery,admission type,presence of shock,presence of acute kidney injury,presence of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome,acute physiologic and chronic health evaluation(APACHE Ⅱ) score,sepsis-related organ failure assessment(SOFA),and PaO_2/FiO_2 ratio.Duration of mechanical ventilation,length of intensive care unit stay,intensive care unit death,length of hospitalization,hospital death and one-year survival were calculated.RESULTS:The incidence of acute respiratory insufficiency was 37.2%(190/321).Multivariate logistic analysis showed a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases(P=0.001),surgeryrelated infection(P=0.004),hypo-volemic shock(P<0.001),and emergency surgery(P=0.018),were independent risk factors of postoperative acute respiratory insufficiency.Compared with the patients without acute respiratory insufficiency,the patients with acute respiratory insufficiency had a prolonged length of intensive care unit stay(P<0.001),a prolonged length of hospitalization(P=0.006),increased intensive care unit mortality(P=0.001),and hospital mortality(P<0.001).Septic shock was shown to be the only independent prognostic factor of intensive care unit death for the patients with acute respiratory insufficiency(P=0.029,RR:8.522,95%CI:1.243-58.437,B=2.143,SE=0.982,Wald=4.758).Compared with the patients without acute respiratory insufficiency,those with acute respiratory insufficiency had a shortened one-year survival rate(78.7%vs.97.1%,P<0.001).CONCLUSION:A history of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases,surgery-related infection,hypovolemic shock and emergency surgery were risk factors of critically ill cancer patients with postoperative acute respiratory insufficiency.Septic shock was the only independent prognostic factor of intensive care unit death in patients with acute respiratory insufficiency.Compared with patients without acute respiratory insufficiency,those with acute respiratory insufficiency had adverse shortterm outcome and a decreased one-year survival rate.展开更多
Septic pulmonary emboli rarely cause respiratory failure that requires mechanical ventilation. The most common causes of septic pulmonary emboli are related to intravenous drug abuse, indwelling intravenous catheters,...Septic pulmonary emboli rarely cause respiratory failure that requires mechanical ventilation. The most common causes of septic pulmonary emboli are related to intravenous drug abuse, indwelling intravenous catheters, endocarditis and septic pelvic thrombophlebitis. In addition, soft tissue injury-related thrombophlebitis rarely causes septic pulmonary emboli. We describe a unique case of a 43-year-old man who developed septic thrombophlebitis of the femoral vein following soft tissue injury from trauma to the shin with ensuing septic pulmonary emboli which necessitated endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. The patient required mechanical ventilation for eleven days, developed empyema and grew out methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on blood cultures. A transesophageal echocardiogram was normal, and there was no indication of bacterial endocarditis. In addition to eleven days of mechanical ventilation, the patient was treated with intravenous heparin, cefepime and clindamycin. These medications were then discontinued and the patient was treated with weight-adjusted vancomycin. Following the return of cultures, the patient was treated for six weeks with ceftaroline 600 mg IV twice a day. In addition, the patient received bilateral thoracentesis followed by chest tube drainage until resolution of the pleural effusions. The patient made a complete recovery. We describe this case and the implications for differential diagnosis and treatment of these two uncommon conditions.展开更多
BACKGROUND: The effect of blood eosinophils(EOSs) on mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS) patients and whether corticosteroids affect this effect are unclear.METHODS: The Medical Information Mart for...BACKGROUND: The effect of blood eosinophils(EOSs) on mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS) patients and whether corticosteroids affect this effect are unclear.METHODS: The Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III database(version 1.4) was used to extract data. Patients with ARDS were selected for inclusion. Cox regression models using the backward stepwise method and propensity score matching(PSM) were used to assess the relationship between blood EOS counts and 28-day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 2,567 patients with ARDS were included, and the 28-day mortality rate was 24.19%. The crude 28-day mortality was significantly lower in patients with EOS counts ≥2%(18.60% [85/457] vs. 25.40% [536/2,110], P=0.002) than in those with EOS counts <2%. In the Cox regression model, the EOS counts ≥2% showed a significant association with the decreased 28-day mortality(hazard ratio [HR] 0.731;95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.581–0.921, P=0.008). In the corticosteroid non-use subgroup, EOS counts ≥2% was significantly related to decreased 28-day mortality(HR 0.697, 95% CI 0.535–0.909, P=0.008), but the result was not significant in the corticosteroid non-use subgroup model(P=0.860). A total of 457 well-matched pairs were obtained by a 1:1 matching algorithm after PSM. The 28-day mortality remained significantly lower in the EOS counts ≥2% group(18.60% [85/457] vs. 26.70% [122/457], P=0.003).CONCLUSIONS Higher EOS counts are related to lower 28-day mortality in ARDS patients, and this relationship can be counteracted by using corticosteroids.展开更多
Alcohol is the most commonly used and abused drug in the world, and alcohol use disorders pose a tremendousburden to healthcare systems around the world. The lifetime prevalence of alcohol abuse in the United States i...Alcohol is the most commonly used and abused drug in the world, and alcohol use disorders pose a tremendousburden to healthcare systems around the world. The lifetime prevalence of alcohol abuse in the United States is estimated to be around 18%, and the economic consequences of these disorders are staggering. Studies on hospitalized patients demonstrate that about one in four patients admitted to critical care units will have alcohol-related issues, and unhealthy alcohol consumption is responsible for numerous clinical problems encountered in intensive care unit(ICU) settings. Patients with alcohol use disorders are not only predisposed to developing withdrawal syndromes and other conditions that often require intensive care, they also experience a considerably higher rate of complications, longer ICU and hospital length of stay, greater resource utilization, and significantly increased mortality compared to similar critically ill patients who do not abuse alcohol. Specific disorders seen in the critical care setting that are impacted by alcohol abuse include delirium, pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, sepsis, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, trauma, and burn injuries. Despite the substantial burden of alcoholinduced disease in these settings, critical care providers often fail to identify individuals with alcohol use disorders, which can have significant implications for this vulnerable population and delay important clinical interventions.展开更多
BACKGROUND Critically ill patients are at risk of developing stress cardiomyopathy(SC)but can be under-recognized.AIM To describe a case series of patients with SC admitted to critical care units.METHODS We conducted ...BACKGROUND Critically ill patients are at risk of developing stress cardiomyopathy(SC)but can be under-recognized.AIM To describe a case series of patients with SC admitted to critical care units.METHODS We conducted a retrospective observational study at a tertiary care teaching hospital.All adult(≥18 years old)patients admitted to the critical care units with stress cardiomyopathy over 5 years were included.RESULTS Of 24279 admissions to the critical care units[19139 to medical-surgical intensive care units(MSICUs)and 5140 in coronary care units(CCUs)],109 patients with SC were identified.Sixty(55%)were admitted to the coronary care units(CCUs)and forty-nine(45%)to the medical-surgical units(MSICUs).The overall incidence of SC was 0.44%,incidence in CCU and MSICU was 1.16%and 0.25%respectively.Sixty-two(57%)had confirmed SC and underwent cardiac catheterization whereas 47(43%)had clinical SC,and did not undergo cardiac catheterization.Forty-three(72%)patients in the CCUs were diagnosed with primary SC,whereas all(100%)patients in MSICUs developed secondary SC.Acute respiratory failure that required invasive mechanical ventilation and shock developed in twenty-nine(59%)MSICU patients.There were no statistically significant differences in intensive care unit(ICU)mortality,in-hospital mortality,use of inotropic or mechanical circulatory support based on type of unit or anatomical variant.CONCLUSION Stress cardiomyopathy can be under-recognized in the critical care setting.Intensivists should have a high index of suspicion for SC in patients who develop sudden or worsening unexplained hemodynamic instability,arrhythmias or respiratory failure in ICU.展开更多
The ongoing outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2[SARSCoV-2,or coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)]was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization on March 11,2020.Worldwide,more than 65 ...The ongoing outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2[SARSCoV-2,or coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)]was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization on March 11,2020.Worldwide,more than 65 million people have been infected with this SARS-CoV-2 virus,and over 1.5 million people have died due to the viral illness.Although a tremendous amount of medical progress has been made since its inception,there continues to be ongoing research regarding the pathophysiology,treatments,and vaccines.While a vast majority of those infected develop only mild to moderate symptoms,about 5%of people have severe forms of infection resulting in respiratory failure,myocarditis,septic shock,or multi-organ failure.Despite maximal cardiopulmonary support and invasive mechanical ventilation,mortality remains high.Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation(ECMO)remains a valid treatment option when maximal conventional strategies fail.Utilization of ECMO in the pandemic is challenging from both resource allocation and ethical standpoints.This article reviews the rationale behind its use,current status of utilization,and future considerations for ECMO in critically ill COVID-19 patients.展开更多
Coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)related acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS)is a severe complication of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2,and the primary cause of death in the curre...Coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)related acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS)is a severe complication of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2,and the primary cause of death in the current pandemic.Critically ill patients often undergo extracorporeal membrane oxygenation(ECMO)therapy as the last resort over an extended period.ECMO therapy requires sedation of the patient,which is usually achieved by intravenous administration of sedatives.The shortage of intravenous sedative drugs due to the ongoing pandemic,and attempts to improve treatment outcome for COVID-19 patients,drove the application of inhaled sedation as a promising alternative for sedation during ECMO therapy.Administration of volatile anesthetics requires an appropriate delivery.Commercially available ones are the anesthetic gas reflection systems AnaConDa®and MIRUSTM,and each should be combined with a gas scavenging system.In this review,we describe respiratory management in COVID-19 patients and the procedures for inhaled sedation during ECMO therapy of COVID-19 related ARDS.We focus particularly on the technical details of administration of volatile anesthetics.Furthermore,we describe the advantages of inhaled sedation and volatile anesthetics,and we discuss the limitations as well as the requirements for safe application in the clinical setting.展开更多
Novel coronavirus,SARS-CoV-2 is responsible for causing a pandemic that has affected individuals worldwide,over 192 million people and about 4.1 million people died so far.The spread is ongoing and the numbers are sti...Novel coronavirus,SARS-CoV-2 is responsible for causing a pandemic that has affected individuals worldwide,over 192 million people and about 4.1 million people died so far.The spread is ongoing and the numbers are still increasing.Numerous therapeutic approaches have been explored and developed during this pandemic.Immunotherapy with virus-specific antibodies in convalescent plasma(CP)has shown potential benefits for various pathogenic diseases.In many instances,it is the only available and safe management option for the COVID-19 patients.Here we describe two confirmed cases of COVID-19 from two different geographical areas that were managed with standard treatment modalities initially.Both of the patients were presented with high-grade fever,dry cough,and sore throat.Lab reports showed increased values of D-dimer,serum ferritin,leukocyte count(LC),Lactate dehydrogenase(LDH),and C-reactive protein(CRP).Chest X-ray showed bilateral infiltration(multifocal and bilateral ground-glass opacities and consolidations with peripheral and basal predominance),consistent with the previous reports on COVID-19 infection.The patients received conservative treatment according to the hospital's protocol.The convalescent plasma(from recovered patients)infusion was the last treatment given to both patients.After the convalescent plasma transfusion,both patients showed a reduction of viral load,an increase of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM antibodies,reduction in lung infiltration,with no adverse events.However,further randomized controlled trials are needed to investigate the full scope of safety and efficacy(both short and long-term)of convalescent plasma therapy for COVID-19 and other related infections.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND:This study aimed to investigate the risk factors and outcome of critically ill cancer patients with postoperative acute respiratory insufficiency.METHODS:The data of 190 critically ill cancer patients with postoperative acute respiratory insufficiency were retrospectively reviewed.The data of 321 patients with no acute respiratory insufficiency as controls were also collected.Clinical variables of the first 24 hours after admission to intensive care unit were collected,including age,sex,comorbid disease,type of surgery,admission type,presence of shock,presence of acute kidney injury,presence of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome,acute physiologic and chronic health evaluation(APACHE Ⅱ) score,sepsis-related organ failure assessment(SOFA),and PaO_2/FiO_2 ratio.Duration of mechanical ventilation,length of intensive care unit stay,intensive care unit death,length of hospitalization,hospital death and one-year survival were calculated.RESULTS:The incidence of acute respiratory insufficiency was 37.2%(190/321).Multivariate logistic analysis showed a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases(P=0.001),surgeryrelated infection(P=0.004),hypo-volemic shock(P<0.001),and emergency surgery(P=0.018),were independent risk factors of postoperative acute respiratory insufficiency.Compared with the patients without acute respiratory insufficiency,the patients with acute respiratory insufficiency had a prolonged length of intensive care unit stay(P<0.001),a prolonged length of hospitalization(P=0.006),increased intensive care unit mortality(P=0.001),and hospital mortality(P<0.001).Septic shock was shown to be the only independent prognostic factor of intensive care unit death for the patients with acute respiratory insufficiency(P=0.029,RR:8.522,95%CI:1.243-58.437,B=2.143,SE=0.982,Wald=4.758).Compared with the patients without acute respiratory insufficiency,those with acute respiratory insufficiency had a shortened one-year survival rate(78.7%vs.97.1%,P<0.001).CONCLUSION:A history of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases,surgery-related infection,hypovolemic shock and emergency surgery were risk factors of critically ill cancer patients with postoperative acute respiratory insufficiency.Septic shock was the only independent prognostic factor of intensive care unit death in patients with acute respiratory insufficiency.Compared with patients without acute respiratory insufficiency,those with acute respiratory insufficiency had adverse shortterm outcome and a decreased one-year survival rate.
文摘Septic pulmonary emboli rarely cause respiratory failure that requires mechanical ventilation. The most common causes of septic pulmonary emboli are related to intravenous drug abuse, indwelling intravenous catheters, endocarditis and septic pelvic thrombophlebitis. In addition, soft tissue injury-related thrombophlebitis rarely causes septic pulmonary emboli. We describe a unique case of a 43-year-old man who developed septic thrombophlebitis of the femoral vein following soft tissue injury from trauma to the shin with ensuing septic pulmonary emboli which necessitated endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. The patient required mechanical ventilation for eleven days, developed empyema and grew out methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on blood cultures. A transesophageal echocardiogram was normal, and there was no indication of bacterial endocarditis. In addition to eleven days of mechanical ventilation, the patient was treated with intravenous heparin, cefepime and clindamycin. These medications were then discontinued and the patient was treated with weight-adjusted vancomycin. Following the return of cultures, the patient was treated for six weeks with ceftaroline 600 mg IV twice a day. In addition, the patient received bilateral thoracentesis followed by chest tube drainage until resolution of the pleural effusions. The patient made a complete recovery. We describe this case and the implications for differential diagnosis and treatment of these two uncommon conditions.
文摘BACKGROUND: The effect of blood eosinophils(EOSs) on mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS) patients and whether corticosteroids affect this effect are unclear.METHODS: The Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III database(version 1.4) was used to extract data. Patients with ARDS were selected for inclusion. Cox regression models using the backward stepwise method and propensity score matching(PSM) were used to assess the relationship between blood EOS counts and 28-day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 2,567 patients with ARDS were included, and the 28-day mortality rate was 24.19%. The crude 28-day mortality was significantly lower in patients with EOS counts ≥2%(18.60% [85/457] vs. 25.40% [536/2,110], P=0.002) than in those with EOS counts <2%. In the Cox regression model, the EOS counts ≥2% showed a significant association with the decreased 28-day mortality(hazard ratio [HR] 0.731;95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.581–0.921, P=0.008). In the corticosteroid non-use subgroup, EOS counts ≥2% was significantly related to decreased 28-day mortality(HR 0.697, 95% CI 0.535–0.909, P=0.008), but the result was not significant in the corticosteroid non-use subgroup model(P=0.860). A total of 457 well-matched pairs were obtained by a 1:1 matching algorithm after PSM. The 28-day mortality remained significantly lower in the EOS counts ≥2% group(18.60% [85/457] vs. 26.70% [122/457], P=0.003).CONCLUSIONS Higher EOS counts are related to lower 28-day mortality in ARDS patients, and this relationship can be counteracted by using corticosteroids.
基金Ashish J Mehta is supported by a Career Development Award(1IK2CX000643)from the Department of Veterans Affairs(Clinical Science Research and Development)
文摘Alcohol is the most commonly used and abused drug in the world, and alcohol use disorders pose a tremendousburden to healthcare systems around the world. The lifetime prevalence of alcohol abuse in the United States is estimated to be around 18%, and the economic consequences of these disorders are staggering. Studies on hospitalized patients demonstrate that about one in four patients admitted to critical care units will have alcohol-related issues, and unhealthy alcohol consumption is responsible for numerous clinical problems encountered in intensive care unit(ICU) settings. Patients with alcohol use disorders are not only predisposed to developing withdrawal syndromes and other conditions that often require intensive care, they also experience a considerably higher rate of complications, longer ICU and hospital length of stay, greater resource utilization, and significantly increased mortality compared to similar critically ill patients who do not abuse alcohol. Specific disorders seen in the critical care setting that are impacted by alcohol abuse include delirium, pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, sepsis, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, trauma, and burn injuries. Despite the substantial burden of alcoholinduced disease in these settings, critical care providers often fail to identify individuals with alcohol use disorders, which can have significant implications for this vulnerable population and delay important clinical interventions.
文摘BACKGROUND Critically ill patients are at risk of developing stress cardiomyopathy(SC)but can be under-recognized.AIM To describe a case series of patients with SC admitted to critical care units.METHODS We conducted a retrospective observational study at a tertiary care teaching hospital.All adult(≥18 years old)patients admitted to the critical care units with stress cardiomyopathy over 5 years were included.RESULTS Of 24279 admissions to the critical care units[19139 to medical-surgical intensive care units(MSICUs)and 5140 in coronary care units(CCUs)],109 patients with SC were identified.Sixty(55%)were admitted to the coronary care units(CCUs)and forty-nine(45%)to the medical-surgical units(MSICUs).The overall incidence of SC was 0.44%,incidence in CCU and MSICU was 1.16%and 0.25%respectively.Sixty-two(57%)had confirmed SC and underwent cardiac catheterization whereas 47(43%)had clinical SC,and did not undergo cardiac catheterization.Forty-three(72%)patients in the CCUs were diagnosed with primary SC,whereas all(100%)patients in MSICUs developed secondary SC.Acute respiratory failure that required invasive mechanical ventilation and shock developed in twenty-nine(59%)MSICU patients.There were no statistically significant differences in intensive care unit(ICU)mortality,in-hospital mortality,use of inotropic or mechanical circulatory support based on type of unit or anatomical variant.CONCLUSION Stress cardiomyopathy can be under-recognized in the critical care setting.Intensivists should have a high index of suspicion for SC in patients who develop sudden or worsening unexplained hemodynamic instability,arrhythmias or respiratory failure in ICU.
文摘The ongoing outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2[SARSCoV-2,or coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)]was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization on March 11,2020.Worldwide,more than 65 million people have been infected with this SARS-CoV-2 virus,and over 1.5 million people have died due to the viral illness.Although a tremendous amount of medical progress has been made since its inception,there continues to be ongoing research regarding the pathophysiology,treatments,and vaccines.While a vast majority of those infected develop only mild to moderate symptoms,about 5%of people have severe forms of infection resulting in respiratory failure,myocarditis,septic shock,or multi-organ failure.Despite maximal cardiopulmonary support and invasive mechanical ventilation,mortality remains high.Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation(ECMO)remains a valid treatment option when maximal conventional strategies fail.Utilization of ECMO in the pandemic is challenging from both resource allocation and ethical standpoints.This article reviews the rationale behind its use,current status of utilization,and future considerations for ECMO in critically ill COVID-19 patients.
文摘Coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)related acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS)is a severe complication of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2,and the primary cause of death in the current pandemic.Critically ill patients often undergo extracorporeal membrane oxygenation(ECMO)therapy as the last resort over an extended period.ECMO therapy requires sedation of the patient,which is usually achieved by intravenous administration of sedatives.The shortage of intravenous sedative drugs due to the ongoing pandemic,and attempts to improve treatment outcome for COVID-19 patients,drove the application of inhaled sedation as a promising alternative for sedation during ECMO therapy.Administration of volatile anesthetics requires an appropriate delivery.Commercially available ones are the anesthetic gas reflection systems AnaConDa®and MIRUSTM,and each should be combined with a gas scavenging system.In this review,we describe respiratory management in COVID-19 patients and the procedures for inhaled sedation during ECMO therapy of COVID-19 related ARDS.We focus particularly on the technical details of administration of volatile anesthetics.Furthermore,we describe the advantages of inhaled sedation and volatile anesthetics,and we discuss the limitations as well as the requirements for safe application in the clinical setting.
文摘Novel coronavirus,SARS-CoV-2 is responsible for causing a pandemic that has affected individuals worldwide,over 192 million people and about 4.1 million people died so far.The spread is ongoing and the numbers are still increasing.Numerous therapeutic approaches have been explored and developed during this pandemic.Immunotherapy with virus-specific antibodies in convalescent plasma(CP)has shown potential benefits for various pathogenic diseases.In many instances,it is the only available and safe management option for the COVID-19 patients.Here we describe two confirmed cases of COVID-19 from two different geographical areas that were managed with standard treatment modalities initially.Both of the patients were presented with high-grade fever,dry cough,and sore throat.Lab reports showed increased values of D-dimer,serum ferritin,leukocyte count(LC),Lactate dehydrogenase(LDH),and C-reactive protein(CRP).Chest X-ray showed bilateral infiltration(multifocal and bilateral ground-glass opacities and consolidations with peripheral and basal predominance),consistent with the previous reports on COVID-19 infection.The patients received conservative treatment according to the hospital's protocol.The convalescent plasma(from recovered patients)infusion was the last treatment given to both patients.After the convalescent plasma transfusion,both patients showed a reduction of viral load,an increase of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM antibodies,reduction in lung infiltration,with no adverse events.However,further randomized controlled trials are needed to investigate the full scope of safety and efficacy(both short and long-term)of convalescent plasma therapy for COVID-19 and other related infections.