There are differences in form between the people＇s mediation system and traditional folk mediation. However, in terms of its scope and basis, people＇s mediation has actually evolved from the traditional Chinese folk...There are differences in form between the people＇s mediation system and traditional folk mediation. However, in terms of its scope and basis, people＇s mediation has actually evolved from the traditional Chinese folk mediation system. In a changing world, grassroots farmers place demands on this form of mediation that provide it with a space for existence. At the same time, the system needs to make institutional adjustments in response to local features.On the basis offieldwork in Southeastern Chongqing, this study analyzes the demand factors among farmers at the grassroots level from the point of view of social relations, economic capital and legal resources, Furthermore, taking the practice of the people＇s mediation system in Southeastern Chongqing--the ＂mediation courtyard＂--as an example, we analyze the application of local knowledge to people＇s mediation practice at the grassroots. Our study found that under the influence of emotional factors and livelihood rationality, the villagers demand that social relations be maintained. Since the people＇s mediation system aecommodates this demand, it has ample room for existence in the villages. On the other hand, people＇s mediation is a passive choice to which villagers are driven because of their lack of economic capital and legal resources. In response to the settlement features of mountainous areas and village social relations and systems of meaning, the people＇s mediation body took institutional measures to localize mediation （the mediation courtyard）, integrating the people＇s mediation system into the logic of village life; but it failed to respond to the problems caused by farmers＇ disadvantage in relation to economic capital and legal resources. On the basis of our research, we end with some reflections on a developmental path for national systems for the management of village society.展开更多
Shared development is an important means by which to improve people’s livelihood and well-being in the new era. During the 13th Five-Year Plan period (2016–2020), China has made great achievements in the three major...Shared development is an important means by which to improve people’s livelihood and well-being in the new era. During the 13th Five-Year Plan period (2016–2020), China has made great achievements in the three major aspects of targeted poverty alleviation through industrial development, development of special rural areas, and equalization of urban and rural infrastructure and basic public services. In addition, the important experience of multi-agent participation, multi-mode guidance, and multi-line promotion has been accumulated in the individual, regional and urbanrural dimensions. However, there remain some deficiencies, such as low policy efficiency, poor matching ability, and prominent structural problems. At the beginning of the 14th Five-Year Plan (2021–2025), the task of enriching farmers through sharing has been faced with many challenges, such as major changes in the focus of poverty governance, greater numbers of restraints on the development of special rural areas, and heavy responsibilities of equalizing urban and rural infrastructure and basic public services. Therefore, it is necessary to acquire a profound understanding of the new development concept, and to continuously enrich farmers through sharing in terms of accelerating the improvement of the institutionalized poverty reduction system in the new era, actively building a green development system of agriculture and animal husbandry in special rural areas, and striving to create a fair and complementary urban and rural infrastructure and basic public service system.展开更多
基金an annual project supported by the National Social Science Fund,entitled"Research into the Livelihood Patterns and Identification of Minority Migrant Workers in Western China"(project number:11BMZ048)supported by the National Social Science Fund Youth Project"Collaborative Paths for the Evolution of Social Networks and Start-up Rural Businesses in a Time of Transition"(project number:14CGL029)
文摘There are differences in form between the people＇s mediation system and traditional folk mediation. However, in terms of its scope and basis, people＇s mediation has actually evolved from the traditional Chinese folk mediation system. In a changing world, grassroots farmers place demands on this form of mediation that provide it with a space for existence. At the same time, the system needs to make institutional adjustments in response to local features.On the basis offieldwork in Southeastern Chongqing, this study analyzes the demand factors among farmers at the grassroots level from the point of view of social relations, economic capital and legal resources, Furthermore, taking the practice of the people＇s mediation system in Southeastern Chongqing--the ＂mediation courtyard＂--as an example, we analyze the application of local knowledge to people＇s mediation practice at the grassroots. Our study found that under the influence of emotional factors and livelihood rationality, the villagers demand that social relations be maintained. Since the people＇s mediation system aecommodates this demand, it has ample room for existence in the villages. On the other hand, people＇s mediation is a passive choice to which villagers are driven because of their lack of economic capital and legal resources. In response to the settlement features of mountainous areas and village social relations and systems of meaning, the people＇s mediation body took institutional measures to localize mediation （the mediation courtyard）, integrating the people＇s mediation system into the logic of village life; but it failed to respond to the problems caused by farmers＇ disadvantage in relation to economic capital and legal resources. On the basis of our research, we end with some reflections on a developmental path for national systems for the management of village society.
基金This article is supported by the“Special Fund Projects for the Construction of World-Class Universities(Disciplines)Characteristic Development Guidance in Central Universities"(No.15XNL004)of Renmin University of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China(No.72073135&No.71773134).
文摘Shared development is an important means by which to improve people’s livelihood and well-being in the new era. During the 13th Five-Year Plan period (2016–2020), China has made great achievements in the three major aspects of targeted poverty alleviation through industrial development, development of special rural areas, and equalization of urban and rural infrastructure and basic public services. In addition, the important experience of multi-agent participation, multi-mode guidance, and multi-line promotion has been accumulated in the individual, regional and urbanrural dimensions. However, there remain some deficiencies, such as low policy efficiency, poor matching ability, and prominent structural problems. At the beginning of the 14th Five-Year Plan (2021–2025), the task of enriching farmers through sharing has been faced with many challenges, such as major changes in the focus of poverty governance, greater numbers of restraints on the development of special rural areas, and heavy responsibilities of equalizing urban and rural infrastructure and basic public services. Therefore, it is necessary to acquire a profound understanding of the new development concept, and to continuously enrich farmers through sharing in terms of accelerating the improvement of the institutionalized poverty reduction system in the new era, actively building a green development system of agriculture and animal husbandry in special rural areas, and striving to create a fair and complementary urban and rural infrastructure and basic public service system.
