Objective:To analyze the feasibility of simultaneous bilateral thoracoscopic lung resection in the treatment of multiple primary lung cancers in the early stage.Methods:The study time range is between March 2019 and M...Objective:To analyze the feasibility of simultaneous bilateral thoracoscopic lung resection in the treatment of multiple primary lung cancers in the early stage.Methods:The study time range is between March 2019 and March 2021.A sample of 30 patients with early multiple primary lung cancer admitted to this hospital were included,and they were divided into a study group,a control group,and samples within the group using a random number table scheme n=15,patients in the control group underwent staged bilateral thoracoscopic pneumonectomy,and patients in the study group underwent bilateral thoracoscopic pneumonectomy at the same time.The indicators of the two groups were compared and analyzed.Results:There was no significant difference in the operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups(P>0.05).There were significant differences in the VAS score,total length of hospital stay,and total surgical costs on the first day after surgery(P<0.05);there was no significant difference in the two groups'postoperative recovery indicators and the incidence of complications(P>0.05).Conclusion:It is safe and feasible to treat patients with multiple primary lung cancer in both lungs at the same time with simultaneous bilateral thoracoscopic surgery,and is suitable for promotion.展开更多
Objective:To explore an effective treatment for spontaneous progressive hemopneumothorax in young people.Methods:Thirty-four young patients with spontaneous progressive hemopneumothorax from January 2018 to December 2...Objective:To explore an effective treatment for spontaneous progressive hemopneumothorax in young people.Methods:Thirty-four young patients with spontaneous progressive hemopneumothorax from January 2018 to December 2019 were selected to be included in the control group for retrospective analysis;from January 2020 to December 2021,69 young patients with spontaneous progressive hemopneumothorax were selected to be included in the study group.The control group was treated with double-port thoracoscopic bullectomy,whereas the study group was treated with single-port thoracoscopic bullectomy.The intraoperative blood loss,operation time,tube retention time,VAS score,postoperative air leakage,and 1-year recurrence of the patients in the two groups were observed and analyzed.Results:The perioperative conditions of the patients in the study group,including intraoperative bleeding loss,operation time,tube retention time,and VAS scores,were 15.12±1.36,54.69±18.78,2.14±0.98,and 3.25±0.14,respectively.The perioperative conditions of the patients in the control group,including intraoperative bleeding loss,operation time,tube retention time,and VAS scores,were 22.69±2.01,55.36±19.01,4.21±1.01,and 5.36±0.45,respectively;other than the operation time,the differences in intraoperative blood loss,tube retention time,and VAS scores between the two groups were statistically significant(p<0.05);after the surgery,two patients in the study group had postoperative air leakage,accounting for 2.90%and another two patients had recurrence one year after the surgery,accounting for 2.90%;on the other hand,three patients in the control group had postoperative air leakage,accounting for 8.82%,and two patients had recurrence one year after the surgery,accounting for 5.88%.However,χ^(2) test showed that p>0.05.Conclusion:Treatment of spontaneous progressive hemopneumothorax in young people is better with single-port thoracoscopic bullectomy than with two-port thoracoscopic bullectomy,which effectively reduces intraoperative bleeding.The pain level is significantly better with single-port thoracoscopic bullectomy than with two-port thoracoscopic bullectomy,and the prognosis of patients is good with a low probability of recurrence for both,single-and twoport thoracoscopic bullectomy.展开更多
文摘Objective:To analyze the feasibility of simultaneous bilateral thoracoscopic lung resection in the treatment of multiple primary lung cancers in the early stage.Methods:The study time range is between March 2019 and March 2021.A sample of 30 patients with early multiple primary lung cancer admitted to this hospital were included,and they were divided into a study group,a control group,and samples within the group using a random number table scheme n=15,patients in the control group underwent staged bilateral thoracoscopic pneumonectomy,and patients in the study group underwent bilateral thoracoscopic pneumonectomy at the same time.The indicators of the two groups were compared and analyzed.Results:There was no significant difference in the operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups(P>0.05).There were significant differences in the VAS score,total length of hospital stay,and total surgical costs on the first day after surgery(P<0.05);there was no significant difference in the two groups'postoperative recovery indicators and the incidence of complications(P>0.05).Conclusion:It is safe and feasible to treat patients with multiple primary lung cancer in both lungs at the same time with simultaneous bilateral thoracoscopic surgery,and is suitable for promotion.
基金Baoding Science and Technology Planning Project(Project Number:1941ZF088)。
文摘Objective:To explore an effective treatment for spontaneous progressive hemopneumothorax in young people.Methods:Thirty-four young patients with spontaneous progressive hemopneumothorax from January 2018 to December 2019 were selected to be included in the control group for retrospective analysis;from January 2020 to December 2021,69 young patients with spontaneous progressive hemopneumothorax were selected to be included in the study group.The control group was treated with double-port thoracoscopic bullectomy,whereas the study group was treated with single-port thoracoscopic bullectomy.The intraoperative blood loss,operation time,tube retention time,VAS score,postoperative air leakage,and 1-year recurrence of the patients in the two groups were observed and analyzed.Results:The perioperative conditions of the patients in the study group,including intraoperative bleeding loss,operation time,tube retention time,and VAS scores,were 15.12±1.36,54.69±18.78,2.14±0.98,and 3.25±0.14,respectively.The perioperative conditions of the patients in the control group,including intraoperative bleeding loss,operation time,tube retention time,and VAS scores,were 22.69±2.01,55.36±19.01,4.21±1.01,and 5.36±0.45,respectively;other than the operation time,the differences in intraoperative blood loss,tube retention time,and VAS scores between the two groups were statistically significant(p<0.05);after the surgery,two patients in the study group had postoperative air leakage,accounting for 2.90%and another two patients had recurrence one year after the surgery,accounting for 2.90%;on the other hand,three patients in the control group had postoperative air leakage,accounting for 8.82%,and two patients had recurrence one year after the surgery,accounting for 5.88%.However,χ^(2) test showed that p>0.05.Conclusion:Treatment of spontaneous progressive hemopneumothorax in young people is better with single-port thoracoscopic bullectomy than with two-port thoracoscopic bullectomy,which effectively reduces intraoperative bleeding.The pain level is significantly better with single-port thoracoscopic bullectomy than with two-port thoracoscopic bullectomy,and the prognosis of patients is good with a low probability of recurrence for both,single-and twoport thoracoscopic bullectomy.