Low-dose immune tolerance induction for severe hemophilia A inhibitor patients:Immunosuppressants are generally not necessary for inhibitor-titer below 200 BU/mL

Importance:It remained unclear that the efficacy comparison between low-dose immune tolerance induction(LD-ITI)incorporating immunosuppressants(IS)when severe hemophilia A(SHA)patients had inhibitor-titer≥200 Bethesda Units(BU)/mL(LD-ITI-IS^(200) regimen)and LD-ITI combining with IS when SHA patients had inhibitor-titer≥40 BU/mL(LD-ITI-IS^(40) regimen).Objective:To compare the efficacy of the LD-ITI-IS^(200) regimen with that of the LD-ITI-IS^(40) regimen for SHA patients with high-titer inhibitors.Methods:A prospective cohort study on patients receiving LD-ITI-IS^(200) compared to those receiving LD-ITI-IS^(40) from January 2021 to December 2023.Both received LD-ITI[FVIII 50 IU/kg every other day].IS(rituximab+prednisone)was added when peak inhibitor tier≥200 BU/mL in the LD-ITI-IS^(200) regimen and≥40 BU/mL in the LD-ITI-IS^(40) regimen.Success is defined as a negative inhibitor plus FVIII recovery≥66%of the expected.Results:We enrolled 30 patients on LD-ITI-IS^(200) and 64 patients on LD-ITI-IS^(40),with similar baseline clinical characteristics.A lower IS-use rate was discovered in the LD-ITI-IS^(200) regimen compared to the LD-ITI-IS^(40) regimen(30.0%vs.62.5%).The two regimens(LD-ITI-IS^(200) vs.LD-ITI-IS^(40))had similar success rate(70.0%vs.79.7%),median time to success(9.4 vs.10.6 months),and annualized bleeding rate during ITI(3.7 vs.2.8).The cost to success was lower for LD-ITI-IS^(200) than for LD-ITI-IS^(40)(2107 vs.3256 US Dollar/kg).Among patients with peak inhibitor-titer 40-199 BU/mL,10 non-IS-using(on LD-ITI-IS^(200) regimen)and 28 IS-using(on LD-ITI-IS^(40) regimen)had similar success rates(70.0%vs.78.6%)and time to success(9.0 vs.8.8 months).Interpretation:In LD-ITI,IS are not necessary for inhibitor titer<200 BU/mL.

The Common γc-Cytokines and Transplantation Tolerance

Transplant rejection,like tolerance,is a T cell-dependent event.There is compelling evidence to suggest that induction of transplant tolerance is an actively learned process in which T cells need to engage with the alloantigens in order to learn to tolerate the ailograft.A family of cytokines whose receptors use the same IL-2 receptor γc chain(also called the common γc)plays an important role in regulating multiple aspects of the aliograft response(i.e.rejection vs.tolerance).It is undeniable that γc cytokines can drive clonal expansion and effector maturation of alloreactive T cells,and therefore,targeting such cytokines or their receptor components remains an attractive way of blocking transplant rejection.However,we just started to appreciate that γc cytokines also regulate the acquisition of transplant tolerance via programming activated T cells for apoptotic cell death and via guiding the evolution of regulatory T cells.Thus,understanding precisely the role of γc cytokines in regulating T cell homeostasis and T cell regulation is critically important in the induction of transplant tolerance.Cellular & Molecular Immunology.2004;1(3):167-172.