Clinical Research of Transumbilical Singleport Laparoscopic Treatment For Pediatric Intussusception

Objective:To explore the feasibility and clinical efficacy of single port laparoscopic surgery through the umbilical cord for the treatment of pediatric intussusception.Method:Clinical data of 38 cases of pediatric intussusception treated with umbilical single port laparoscopic surgery from December 2017 to June 2019 were collected.The surgical method involves placing Trocar through the umbilical incision to establish pneumoperitoneum,inserting a single hole with a 0°laparoscopic operating channel,exploring intussusception,and performing non-invasive forceps to completely reduce it.After the reduction of intussusception,if intestinal malformation is found,the umbilical incision can be expanded to lift the diseased intestinal tract out of the abdominal cavity for resection.At the same time,clinical data of 24 children who underwent traditional porous laparoscopic intussusception surgery during the same period were collected,and the surgical time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative hospital stay,and satisfaction score of incision aesthetics were compared between the two groups of children.Result:Both groups of patients successfully completed the surgery,and compared with the porous laparoscopic group,the single hole laparoscopic group had a shorter surgical time[(32.4±8.6)minutes vs.(40.6±9.8)minutes,P<0.05],decreased bleeding volume[(5.5±1.5)mL vs.(8.6±2.2)mL,P<0.05],significantly shortened postoperative hospital stay[(4.6±1.2)d vs.(6.2±1.4)d,P<0.05],and significantly increased satisfaction score with incision aesthetics[(4.2±0.8)points vs.(3.2±0.7)points,P<0.05].Follow up for 6 months to 2 years showed no recurrence of intussusception.Conclusion:Transumbilical single port laparoscopic surgery is a safe and effective method for children with intussusception,which is characterized by small trauma,fast recovery,short operation time,and better aesthetic effect.

Modified technical protocol for single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using needle-type grasping forceps for acute simple appendicitis:A case report

BACKGROUND Because of the mild inflammatory status in acute uncomplicated appendicitis,our team developed a novel technical protocol for single-port laparoscopic appendec-tomy using needle-type grasping forceps(SLAN)and achieved positive clinical outcomes.However,the intraoperative procedure lacked stability and fluency due to a series of problems highlighted by the small incision design of the proto-col(only 1 cm long).Therefore,there is a growing clinical demand to further opti-mize the SLAN protocol.CASE SUMMARY An adult male patient was admitted for persistent right lower abdominal pain with preoperative computed tomography findings suggestive of appendicitis accompanied by localized peritonitis.A modified technical protocol for SLAN based on minimally invasive surgical principles was used,and the patient was confirmed to have acute simple appendicitis by postoperative pathological ana-lysis.Postoperative recovery was uneventful,and no postoperative complications,such as incision infection or severe incision pain,were observed.The patient was discharged successfully on postoperative day 2.CONCLUSION The modified technical protocol of SLAN may be a new minimally invasive surgical alternative for patients with acute simple appendicitis.

Transumbilical endoscopic surgery:History,present situation and perspectives

Transumbilical endoscopic surgery or laparo-endoscopic single site(LESS)surgery has become an exciting area of surgical development as innovation continues to move in the 21st century to minimally invasive surgery.The history,present situation and perspectives are reviewed and the nomenclature of this technique is discussed in this article.The range of this technique has been applied in almost all abdominal diseases,surgeries for morbid obesity,hernia and so on,in recent years.It is estimated that 50%-80%of traditional laparoscopic surgery could be performed transumbilically in the next five years according to the LESSCAR consensus.Although the concept of transumbilical laparoscopic surgery is gaining traction rapidly and the instruments have been improved greatly, we should not advocate for slightly improved cosmetic value over safety.Multicenter,randomized and clinical trials are necessary to further elucidate the safety and efficiency of this new technique.Research that examines the efficacy of the new instruments on the market may be helpful to simplify the confusing landscape of new and novel products designed for this purpose.

Transumbilical enterostomy for Hirschsprung’s disease with a two-stage laparoscopy-assisted pull-through procedure

BACKGROUND A one-stage laparoscopic operation has recently been considered a favorable option for the management of patients with Hirschsprung's disease(HD)due to its superior cosmetic results.One-stage transanal endorectal pull-through for the treatment of rectosigmoid HD has been widely used in newborns without complications.However,enterostomy is required in some HD cases for enterocolitis and dilated colon.Our transumbilical enterostomy(TUE)and twostage laparoscopy-assisted anorectoplasty were effective and achieved a similar cosmetic effect to one-stage laparoscopy on the abdominal wall in patients with anorectal malformation,but the effect in patients with HD is unclear.AIM To evaluate the safety,efficacy and cosmetic results of TUE in two-stage laparoscopy-assisted pull-through for HD.METHODS From June 2013 to June 2018,53 patients(40 boys,13 girls;mean age at enterostomy:5.5±2.2 mo)who underwent enterostomy and two-stage laparoscopy-assisted pull-through for HD with stoma closure were reviewed at our institution.Two enterostomy approaches were used:TUE in 24 patients,and conventional abdominal enterostomy(CAE)in 29 patients.Eleven patients with rectosigmoid HD had severe preoperative enterocolitis or a dilated colon.26 patients had long-segment HD,and 16 patients had total colonic aganglionosis(TCA).The patients with left-sided HD underwent the two-stage laparoscopic Soave procedure,and the patients with right-sided HD and TCA underwent the laparoscopic Duhamel procedure.Demographics,enterostomy operative time,complications and cosmetic results were respectively evaluated.RESULTS There were no differences between the groups with respect to gender,age at enterostomy,weight and clinical type(P>0.05).No conversion to open technique was required.Two patients experienced episodes of stomal mucosal prolapse in the TUE group and 1 patient in the CAE group(8.33%vs 3.45%,P>0.05).No parastomal hernia was observed in either of the two groups.Wound infection at the stoma was seen in 1 case in the TUE group,and 2 cases in the CAE group(4.17%vs 6.90%,P>0.05).No obstruction was noted in any of the patients in the TUE group,whereas obstruction was found in 1 patient in the CAE group.Enterocolitis was observed in 3 and 5 patients in the TUE and CAE group,respectively(12.50%vs 17.24%,P>0.05).There was no significant difference between the TUE group and CAE group in terms of the incidence of soiling and constipation(P>0.05).The cosmetic result using the scar score in the TUE group was better than that in the CAE group(6.83±0.96 vs 13.32±1.57,P<0.05).CONCLUSION TUE is a safe and feasible method for the treatment of HD,and the staged enterostomy and two-stage laparoscopy-assisted pull-through achieved a similar cosmetic effect to the one-stage laparoscopic procedure.

Transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy in children: Clinical and surgical outcomes

The aim of this paper is to present and describe tran-sumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy in chil-dren, focusing on its technical aspects and clinical andsurgical outcomes. The surgical charts of all patientsaged between 0 and 14 years treated with transumbili-cal laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy admitted tothe authors' institution from January 2009 to Septem-ber 2013 with a diagnosis of suspected appendicitis fol-lowing clinical, laboratory and ultrasound findings werereviewed. Operating time, intraoperative findings, needfor conversion or for additional trocars, and surgicacomplications were reported. During the study period,120 patients aged between 6 and 14 years(mean age:9.9 years), 73 females(61%) and 47 males(39%),were treated with transumbilical laparoscopic-assistedappendectomy. There were 37 cases of hyperemicappendicitis(subserosal and retrocecal), 74 cases ofphlegmonous appendicitis and 9 cases of perforatedgangrenous appendicitis. It was not possible to estab-lish a correlation between grade of appendicitis andmean operating time(P > 0.05). Eleven cases(9%)needed the use of one additional trocar, while 8 pa-tients(6%) required conversion to the standard laparo-scopic technique with the use of two additional trocars. No patient was converted to the open technique. Tran-sumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy is a safe technique in children and it could be used by surgeons who want to approach other minimally invasive tech-niques.

Transumbilical single-incision endoscopic splenectomy:Report of ten cases

AIM: To investigate the feasibility and clinical application of transumbilical single-incision endoscopic splenectomy using conventional laparoscopic instruments.

First 100 cases of transvesical single-port robotic radical prostatectomy

Objective:To describe the surgical technique and report the early outcomes of the transvesical(TV)approach to single-port(SP)robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Methods:All procedures were performed at a single center by one surgeon.We identified the first 100 consecutive patients with clinically localized prostate cancer that underwent SP TV robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the da Vinci SP robotic surgical system.Data were collected prospectively and analyzed with descriptive statistics.The primary outcomes assessed were postoperative urinary continence,rate of biochemical recurrence,and sexual function.Results:All procedures were performed without extra ports or conversion.The median age was 62.1 years and 49.0%of the patients had abdominal surgery history.The preoperative median prostate-specific antigen value and prostate volume were 5.0 ng/mL and 33.0 mL,respectively.There were no intraoperative complications.The median operative time and estimated blood loss were 212.5 min and 100.0 mL,respectively.A total of 92.0%of patients were discharged within 24.0 h,with an overall median length of stay of 5.6 h.Only 4.0%of patients required opioid prescriptions at discharge.The median Foley catheter duration was 3 days.Positive margins were present in 15.0%of cases.Median follow-up was 10.4 months.Continence rate was immediate after Foley removal in 49.0%of cases,65.0%at 2 weeks,77.4%at 6 weeks,94.1%at 6 months,and 98.9%at 1 year.One case of biochemical recurrence(1.0%)was noted 3 months after surgery.Conclusion:The SP TV approach for radical prostatectomy cases is a safe and feasible technique for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.This technique offers advantages of short hospital stay,minimal narcotic use postoperatively,and promising early return of urinary continence,without compromising oncologic outcomes.

常规器械免举宫经脐单孔腹腔镜全子宫切除术

目的探讨常规器械免举宫经脐单孔腹腔镜全子宫切除术治疗宫颈病变的应用价值。方法选择2021年12月~2023年6月因宫颈高级别鳞状上皮内病变(high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion,HSIL)或宫颈癌ⅠA1期行腹腔镜全子宫切除术60例,按患者意愿行经脐单孔腹腔镜手术及多孔腹腔镜手术各30例,均使用常规器械,不使用举宫器,比较2组手术指标。结果2组均未出现中转开腹及泌尿系、肠道或大血管等损伤。单孔组出血量较少[(54.6±20.5)ml vs.(67.5±27.0)ml,P=0.041],排气较早[(27.6±8.0)h vs.(32.2±9.0)h,P=0.040],总住院时间较短[(4.4±1.5)d vs.(5.1±1.2)d,P=0.044]。2组子宫重量、手术时间以及术后并发症差异无显著性(P>0.05)。2组切口愈合良好,未出现与穿刺器相关的近期并发症(如穿刺孔感染、出血)或远期并发症(如脐疝、切口疝)。结论免举宫经脐单孔腹腔镜全子宫切除术出血少,术后恢复快,瘢痕最小化,并发症与传统腹腔镜手术相似。

小儿经脐单部位阑尾切除术与腹腔镜阑尾切除术的疗效对比

目的比较经脐单部位阑尾切除术与腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗小儿急性阑尾炎的疗效。方法回顾性分析我科收治的162例14岁以下急性阑尾炎患儿的临床资料,根据手术不同将患儿分为经脐单部位手术组(n=59)与腹腔镜组(n=103)。记录患儿手术完成情况,比较2组患儿手术时间、术中出血量、胃肠道功能恢复时间、住院费用、住院时间、并发症发生情况等,观察患儿术后切口愈合情况。术后随访6个月,观察患儿切口感染、腹痛、腹胀、呕吐及大便异常等情况。结果腹腔镜组患儿手术均顺利完成,无中转开腹病例;经脐单部位组患儿有2例因查找阑尾困难,术中经脐部联用腹腔镜查找阑尾。经脐单部位手术组患儿手术时间、住院时间较均短于腹腔镜组(P<0.05)。2组患儿住院费用、术中出血量、胃肠道功能恢复时间、并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。经脐单部位手术组患儿术后切口愈合更美观。随访期间,2组患儿切口均愈合良好,并未出现腹痛、腹胀、呕吐及大便异常等。结论与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术比较,经脐单部位阑尾切除术具有操作简单、手术时间和住院时间短、切口愈合更美观等优点。

郑氏4C悬吊法经脐单孔腹腔镜手术治疗宫颈癌的疗效及预后分析

目的探讨郑氏4C悬吊法经脐单孔腹腔镜手术(TU-LSSS)治疗宫颈癌的疗效,并分析其预后。方法选取我院收治的宫颈癌患者92例,并随机分为对照组(传统腹腔镜术)和观察组(郑氏4C悬吊法TU-LSSS),每组46例。比较2组患者围术期相关指标。随访3年,记录患者无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS),并分析预后的影响因素。结果与对照组比较,观察组患者手术时间更长(P<0.05),术中出血量更少(P<0.05),术后肠鸣音恢复时间、住院时间更短(P<0.05),术后3年PFS率、3年OS率更高(P<0.05)。随访3年,疾病进展或死亡共11例。经单因素分析,预后良好组与预后不良组患者肿瘤直径、临床分期、淋巴结转移、脉管浸润、治疗方法比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);二元Logistic回归分析显示,肿瘤直径(≥4 cm)、临床分期(≥ⅠB2期)、淋巴结转移、脉管浸润是宫颈癌预后的危险因素(P<0.05),郑氏4C悬吊法TU-LSSS是保护因素(P<0.05)。结论郑氏4C悬吊法TU-LSSS治疗宫颈癌可有效促进患者恢复,提高3年PFS率和OS率。预后与多种因素有关,需根据不同危险因素给予针对性处理。

经脐单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜治疗妇科良性疾病的效果对比

目的分析经脐单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜治疗妇科良性疾病的方法与效果。方法选取60例妇科良性疾病患者,按照随机抽签法将其分为对照组与观察组,各30例,分别实施传统腹腔镜与经脐单孔腹腔镜治疗,对比两组手术效果。结果与对照组对比,观察组术后疼痛评分更低,术后住院时间更短,住院费用更少(P<0.05)。观察组治疗满意度96.67%较对照组的76.67%高(P<0.05)。结论经脐单孔腹腔镜治疗妇科良性疾病效果更加确切,能够提高患者手术质量与治疗满意度,值得临床推广。

经脐单孔腹腔镜体外剥除良性巨大卵巢囊肿的临床分析

目的:探讨经脐单孔腹腔镜体外剥除良性巨大卵巢囊肿的安全性和可行性。方法:回顾性分析成都市第三人民医院2021年10月至2022年9月收治的行经脐单孔腹腔镜治疗的72例良性巨大卵巢囊肿患者的临床资料,其中单孔腹腔镜体外剥除囊肿31例(单孔体外剥除组),单孔腹腔镜体内剥除囊肿41例(单孔体内剥除组),比较两组手术时间、术中气腹使用时间、术中出血量、术中囊液渗漏率、术后肛门排气时间、术后24小时疼痛程度、术后住院时间等。结果:术中囊液渗漏率单孔体外剥除组(0 vs.21.1%)明显低于单孔体内剥除组(P<0.05)。单孔体外剥除组手术时间(60.19±5.64分钟vs.72.02±6.89分钟)、术中气腹使用时间(15.23±2.69分钟vs.53.83±6.74分钟)及术后肛门排气时间(28.16±3.53小时vs.32.24±3.87小时)均短于单孔体内剥除组(P<0.05)。两组术中出血量、术后24小时疼痛视觉模拟(VAS)评分及术后住院时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:单孔腹腔镜体外剥除囊肿手术在良性巨大卵巢囊肿剥除术中可以极大程度避免术中囊液腹腔内渗漏,更加遵循手术无瘤原则,同时缩短手术时间,促进术后快速康复,此手术方式安全可行,值得临床推广。

经脐环上缘疝修补术治疗儿童脐上3 cm以内白线疝

目的探讨经脐环上缘入路筋膜下间隙修补脐上3 cm以内白线疝的安全性和有效性。方法回顾性分析我院2016年6月~2022年7月白线疝修补术资料,26例彩超检查提示白线疝下缘至脐上缘距离≤3 cm,经脐环上缘入路筋膜下间隙实施白线疝修补术。男7例,女19例。年龄7个月~11岁,中位数3岁。疝囊下缘至脐上缘距离(1.46±0.66)cm,白线疝疝环直径(1.16±0.57)cm。结果手术过程顺利,手术时间(39.1±26.3)min,无并发症,术后1天出院。随访时间1年2个月~7年3个月,中位数5年1个月。无伤口感染、出血等并发症,无白线疝复发和皮肤肉芽肿形成。结论经脐环上缘入路修补儿童脐上3 cm以内白线疝安全、有效,切口美观。

经脐单一部位腹腔镜手术治疗小儿梅克尔憩室122例

目的探讨经脐单一部位腹腔镜手术治疗小儿梅克尔憩室(Meckel’s diverticulum,MD)的安全性和可行性。方法2019年1月~2023年6月我科采用经脐单一部位腹腔镜手术治疗MD 122例,经脐部取纵行切口,切口左右分别置入5 mm trocar,于观察孔和操作孔置入腹腔镜和无损伤肠钳,探查腹腔并寻找憩室,扩大脐部切口后将憩室提出腹腔外行切除吻合。结果122例患儿均在腹腔镜下明确诊断;4例术前诊断为急性坏疽性阑尾炎,术中腔镜探查诊断为MD合并穿孔;憩室合并下消化道出血48例、炎性反应38例、肠套叠12例、索带卡压肠梗阻8例、穿孔致腹膜炎12例。所有手术均顺利完成,手术时间58~125 min,平均78 min。术后病理均证实为MD。2例切口感染,经换药治疗后治愈。术后2~4 d开始流质饮食,5~9 d出院。119例患儿术后随访3~18个月,手术效果满意,无术后便血、吻合口狭窄、粘连性肠梗阻、切口疝等严重并发症发生。结论经脐单一部位腹腔镜手术治疗小儿MD安全可行,MD合并穿孔或肠梗阻并不是经脐单一部位腹腔镜手术的禁忌证。

基于倾向评分匹配的经脐单孔与三孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的临床疗效对比

目的探讨基于倾向评分匹配的经脐单孔与三孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的临床疗效。方法2020年1月~2022年12月行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的急性胆囊炎病人106例,根据治疗方法不同分为两组,研究组64例,采用经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术,对照组42例,采用三孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术。比较两组病人手术相关指标、术后恢复情况及术后并发症情况。结果两组体质量指数(BMI)、胆囊B超检查结果比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),研究组病人平均年龄大于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。将两组病人倾向评分匹配后的一般资料进行比较发现,两组性别、年龄、BMI、胆囊B超检查结果无明显差异(P>0.05)。研究组手术时间为(61.48±10.24)分钟,对照组为(40.42±8.35)分钟;研究组术后6小时、24小时的疼痛视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分分别为(5.63±1.04)分和(3.42±0.65)分,对照组分别为(7.22±1.61)分和(5.48±1.02)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组病人手术中的失血量比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。研究组的住院时间及肠胃功能恢复时间分别为(2.05±0.42)天和(33.46±4.30)小时,对照组分别为(3.95±1.02)天和(47.58±7.62)小时;研究组病人对切口瘢痕满意度评分为(4.58±0.42)分,对照组为(3.02±0.38)分,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组并发症总发生率为2.78%,对照组为16.67%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的术后疼痛感较三孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术明显更低,住院时间及肠胃功能恢复时间更短,病人对切口瘢痕满意度的评分更高,同时术后并发症的总发生率更低。

基于磁锚定技术的单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除手术的护理配合

目的 探讨基于磁锚定技术的单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除手术的护理配合要点。方法 分析实施磁锚定经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除手术患者24例的一般资料,结合手术操作实施过程,从手术室护士角度分析如何掌握该创新手术的护理配合要点。结果 手术室护士通过术前学习磁锚定技术原理,了解磁锚定装置的使用方法及注意事项,术中准确传递磁锚定装置,避免磁锚定设备与常规手术器械间的相互干吸引扰,最终配合术者顺利完成了24例磁锚定经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除手术。结论 术中实时了解术者的操作进度,准确传递器械,避免磁锚定装置和常规手术器械之间的干扰是该手术术中护理配合的重要因素。

经脐单孔腹腔镜保护卵巢功能的卵巢囊肿剥除术

目的 探讨经脐单孔腹腔镜保护卵巢功能的卵巢囊肿剥除术的经验。方法 2018年7月~2019年12月我院行56例单孔腹腔镜卵巢囊肿剥除术,术中横行切开脐部约2 cm,置入单孔套管穿刺器,建立人工气腹。超声刀避开卵巢门在其对侧切开卵巢皮质以保证良好血供,固定患侧卵巢,便于钝性分离囊肿并尽可能保留卵巢正常组织,选择2-0可吸收缝线缝合止血以及卵巢成形。结果 56例均顺利完成卵巢囊肿剥除术,其中3例双侧卵巢囊肿剥除术,3例联合输卵管切除,1例联合输卵管系膜囊肿剥除术,2例联合子宫肌瘤剔除术,1例联合阑尾切除术(因术后需腹腔引流,增加1个穿刺孔),1例联合宫腔镜子宫内膜息肉电切术,1例联合盆腔粘连松解术。手术时间(72.0±30.0)min。术后住院时间(5.0±0.6) d。无一例发生并发症。56例随访2~3年,平均1.5年,无并发症发生,无切口愈合不良,卵巢囊肿无复发。术后6、12个月与术前比较卵巢窦卵泡数差异无显著性[(7.02±1.57)个vs.(7.05±1.55)个,P=1.000;(6.93±1.46)个vs.(7.05±1.55)个,P=1.000]。术后3个月与术前比较卵巢基质血流差异无显著性(P>0.05),提示卵巢功能无减退。结论 保护卵巢功能的关键是术中合理选择手术器械与切口、精细化操作剥离卵巢囊肿以及保护卵巢的血供。

腹腔镜下经脐单部位阑尾切除术治疗小儿阑尾炎的效果及对炎症因子的影响

目的:探究腹腔镜下经脐单部位阑尾切除术治疗小儿阑尾炎的效果及对炎症因子的影响。方法:回顾性分析2022年3月至2023年6月期间我院就诊的阑尾炎患儿的临床资料,从接受腹腔镜下经脐单部位阑尾切除术的患儿中采用随机数字表法随机抽取55例纳入观察组,从接受采取传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗的患儿中采用随机数字表法随机抽取50例纳入对照组。比较两组患儿的手术相关指标、术后恢复情况和术后并发症发生情况。并比较术前和术后5d的阑尾炎症状缓解情况[阑尾炎炎症反应(appendicitis inflammatory response,AIR)评分、视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue scale,VAS)评分],比较术前、术后48h和术后5d的炎症因子水平。结果:观察组患儿的手术时间、术中出血量、术后首次排气时间、体温恢复正常时间、下床活动时间、住院时间、术后并发症发生率均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后5d,两组患儿的AIR评分和VAS评分较术前降低,且观察组降低幅度大于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。重复测量方差分析显示两组患者术后的时点效应、组间效应及时点和组间的交互效应均可影响CRP、PCT、WBC水平的变化(P<0.05),且观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:腹腔镜下经脐单部位阑尾切除术治疗小儿阑尾炎具有积极效果,减少术后并发症,降低炎症因子水平,有助于患儿快速恢复。

三种腹腔镜手术在异位妊娠治疗的临床对比研究

目的比较经阴道自然腔道内镜手术(transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery,v-NOTES)、经脐单孔腹腔镜手术(transumbilical laparoendoscopic single site surgery,TU-LESS)及传统腹腔镜手术治疗异位妊娠的疗效与差异。方法回顾性选取2019年6月至2022年6月扬州大学医学院附属扬州市妇幼保健院收治的异位妊娠患者121例,根据手术方式不同将纳入患者分为传统腹腔镜组(49例)、TU-LESS组(43例)和v-NOTES组(29例)。观察各组患者的年龄、体质量指数(body mass index,BMI)、血红蛋白(hemoglobin,Hb)、手术时间、术中出血、术后排气时间、术后24h视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue scale,VAS)评分、术后住院时间和满意度。结果v-NOTES组患者的排气时间、术后住院时间均显著短于传统腹腔镜组和TU-LESS组,术后24h VAS评分显著低于传统腹腔镜组和TU-LESS组(P<0.05);三组患者的术后满意度比较差异有统计学意义(H=57.364,P<0.001),且v-NOTES组>TU-LESS组>传统腹腔镜组。结论与TU-LESS和传统腹腔镜手术比较,v-NOTES治疗异位妊娠术后恢复快,疼痛轻,更加美观,但需要手术者熟练掌握。

腹腔镜下幽门环肌切开术与经脐上小切口幽门环肌切开术治疗小儿先天性肥厚性幽门狭窄的效果比较

目的分析腹腔镜下幽门环肌切开术与经脐上小切口幽门环肌切开术治疗小儿先天性肥厚性幽门狭窄(CHPS)的效果。方法82例CHPS患儿根据治疗方法的不同分为两组,参照组接受经脐上小切口幽门环肌切开术治疗,研究组接受腹腔镜下幽门环肌切开术治疗,比较两组的围术期指标、疼痛程度、并发症。结果研究组的术中出血量少于参照组,术后恢复喂养时间及住院时间均短于参照组,术后48 h的CRIES评分低于参照组(P<0.05)。两组的手术时间、术后并发症总发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论与经脐上小切口幽门环肌切开术相比,腹腔镜下幽门环肌切开术治疗小儿CHPS的创伤较小,可明显减轻患儿的术后疼痛程度,加快患儿术后恢复,且未明显增加术后并发症发生风险。