BACKGROUND Cerebral infarction patients need to be bedridden for long periods of time often resulting in pressure injuries,which may represent a serious threat to patients'life and health.An effective nursing prog...BACKGROUND Cerebral infarction patients need to be bedridden for long periods of time often resulting in pressure injuries,which may represent a serious threat to patients'life and health.An effective nursing program should be adopted for timely intervention in patients with pressure wounds.AIM To explore the value of nursing services based on a multidisciplinary collaborative treatment team in patients with pressure injury wounds following cerebral infarction.METHODS Patients with cerebral infarction pressure injury wounds in our hospital from December 2016 to January 2021 were selected and divided into one study group and one control group based on the simple random number table method.The control group was treated with conventional nursing care(CNC),and the study group was treated with care services based on multidisciplinary collaborative care(MDCC).The Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing(PUSH),healing effect,Self-Perceived Burden Score(SPBS),and satisfaction with the intervention were calculated before and after 2 and 4 wk of intervention in both groups.RESULTS Sixty-two patients were enrolled,and 31 patients were assigned to each group.The results of the interventions were as follows:(1)There was no significant difference between the PUSH scores of the MDCC group(11.19±2.46)and CNC group(12.01±2.79)before the intervention(P>0.05),and the PUSH scores were lower after 2 and 4 wk of intervention in the MDCC group(6.63±1.97 and 3.11±1.04)than in the CNC group(8.78±2.13 and 4.96±1.35 points)(P<0.05);(2)The rate of wound healing in the MDCC group(96.77%)was higher than that in the CNC group(80.65%)(P<0.05);(3)There was no significant difference between the SPBS scores of emotional factors(21.15±3.11),economic factors(9.88±2.15),and physical factors(8.19±2.23)in the two groups before the intervention.The scores of emotional factors(13.51±1.88),economic factors(6.38±1.44),and physical factors(5.37±1.08)were lower in the MDCC group than in the CNC group(16.89±2.05,7.99±1.68 and 7.06±1.19)after 4 wk of intervention(P<0.05);and(4)Satisfaction with the intervention was higher in the MDCC group(93.55%)than in the CNC group(74.19%)(P<0.05).CONCLUSION Interventions for patients with cerebral infarction pressure wounds based on an MDCC treatment team can effectively reduce patients'self-perceived burden,improve pressure wound conditions,facilitate wound healing,and increase patient satisfaction with the intervention.展开更多
AIM: To investigate the effect of the establishment of in-house multidisciplinary team (MDT) availability (iMDTa) on survival in upper gastrointestinal cancer (UGI) patients. METHODS: In 2001, a cancer centre with irr...AIM: To investigate the effect of the establishment of in-house multidisciplinary team (MDT) availability (iMDTa) on survival in upper gastrointestinal cancer (UGI) patients. METHODS: In 2001, a cancer centre with irradiation and chemotherapy facilities was established in the Norwegian county of West Agder with a change of iMDTa (WA/MDT-Change). "iMDTa"-status was defined according to the availability of the necessary specialists within one institution on one campus, serving the population of one county. We compared survival rates during 2000-2008 for UGI patients living in counties with (MDT-Yes), without (MDT-No), with a mix (MDT-Mix) and WA/MDT-Change. Survival was calculated with Kaplan-Meier method. Cox model was used to uncover differences between counties with different MDT status when adjusted for age, sex and stage. RESULTS: We analyzed 395 patients from WA/MDT-Change and compared their survival to 12 135 UGIpatients from four other Norwegian regions. Median overall survival for UGI patients in WA/MDT-Change increased from 129 to 300 d from 2000-2008, P = 0.001. The regions with the highest level of iMDTa achieved the largest decrease in risk of death for UGI cancers (compared to the county with MDT-Mix: MDT-Yes 11%, P <0.05 and WA/MDT-Change 15%, P < 0.05). Analyzing the different tumour entities separately, patients living in the WA/MDT-Change county reached a statisti-cally significant reduction in the risk of death [hazard ratios (HR)] compared to patients in the county with MDT-Mix for oesophageal and gastric, but not for pan-creatic cancer. HR for the study period 2000-2004 are given first and then for the period 2005-2008: The HR for oesophageal cancers was reduced from [HR = 1.12; 95%CI: 0.75-1.68 to HR = 0.60, 95%CI: 0.38-0.95] and for gastric cancers from [HR = 0.87, 95%CI: 0.66-1.15 to HR = 0.63, 95%CI: 0.43-0.93], but not for pancreatic cancer [HR = 1.04-, 95%CI: 0.83-1.3 for 2000-2004 and HR = 1.01, 95%CI: 0.78-1.3 for 2005-2008]. UGI patients treated during the second study period in the county of WA/MDT-Change had a higher probability of receiving chemotherapy. In the first study period, only one out of 43 patients (2.4%, 95%CI: 0-6.9) received chemotherapy, compared to 18 of 42 patients diagnosed during 2005-2008 (42.9%, 95%CI: 28.0-57.8). CONCLUSION: Introduction of iMDTa led to a two-fold increase of UGI patients, whereas no increase in survival was found in the MDT-No or MDT-Mix counties.展开更多
2020年乳腺癌已成为全球发病率最高的恶性肿瘤,近年来随着诊疗技术的提升,中国乳腺癌患者生存率虽显著提高,但仍与西方国家存在较大差异。目前国内乳腺癌诊治仍存在诸多不足的地方,如院内缺少综合治疗的复合型医学人才、患者有效就诊时...2020年乳腺癌已成为全球发病率最高的恶性肿瘤,近年来随着诊疗技术的提升,中国乳腺癌患者生存率虽显著提高,但仍与西方国家存在较大差异。目前国内乳腺癌诊治仍存在诸多不足的地方,如院内缺少综合治疗的复合型医学人才、患者有效就诊时间短、就诊流程繁琐等。多学科团队诊疗(multidisciplinary team treatment,MDT)模式是由多个学科的资深专家团队合作,针对某一种或某一系统疾病的病例进行讨论,在综合各学科意见的基础上为患者制订出最佳治疗方案的诊疗模式。MDT已经逐渐被多个肿瘤治疗领域接受并广泛实施,很多常见肿瘤治愈率的提高是通过MDT实现的。该模式涉及方面广泛,包括医院制度化建设及核心科室和协同科室的专业合作等。其实施可以提高疾病的诊断率,减少误诊或漏诊,也可以提高指南实施规范性,从而在整体上提高以患者为中心的全病程管理能力及乳腺癌单病种科室的诊疗能力,最终助力《健康中国行动(2019—2030年)》实现。但全国各地MDT实施缺乏统一的流程及标准,国内外尚无专门针对乳腺癌单病种的MDT标准与规范,以指导并提升临床实践能力。本标准与规范由健康报社主办,中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会发起,在具有肿瘤诊疗相关专科的综合医院和肿瘤专科医院组织多学科专家,依据高级别循证医学依据,通过共同讨论形成赋能专科建设项目并制订《乳腺癌多学科诊疗标准与规范(2023年版)》。本标准与规范的具体内容包括:①乳腺癌MDT组织建设及运营机制的基本要求;②初诊(早期)乳腺癌患者MDT标准与规范;③复诊(复发转移性/初诊晚期)乳腺癌患者MDT标准与规范;④以患者为中心的MDT规范化标准诊疗流程;⑤乳腺癌MDT高质量发展的其他要求及建议。本标准与规范旨在从MDT所有参与的单学科或科室应该承担的职责出发,以患者为中心,提供一站式医疗服务,共同探索符合中国国情的MDT标准与规范,同时评选出优秀及标杆医院,以促进该领域的MDT进展,并进一步规范乳腺癌慢病化与规范化全程管理,最终推动乳腺癌领域的变革与进步,造福乳腺癌患者。展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Cerebral infarction patients need to be bedridden for long periods of time often resulting in pressure injuries,which may represent a serious threat to patients'life and health.An effective nursing program should be adopted for timely intervention in patients with pressure wounds.AIM To explore the value of nursing services based on a multidisciplinary collaborative treatment team in patients with pressure injury wounds following cerebral infarction.METHODS Patients with cerebral infarction pressure injury wounds in our hospital from December 2016 to January 2021 were selected and divided into one study group and one control group based on the simple random number table method.The control group was treated with conventional nursing care(CNC),and the study group was treated with care services based on multidisciplinary collaborative care(MDCC).The Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing(PUSH),healing effect,Self-Perceived Burden Score(SPBS),and satisfaction with the intervention were calculated before and after 2 and 4 wk of intervention in both groups.RESULTS Sixty-two patients were enrolled,and 31 patients were assigned to each group.The results of the interventions were as follows:(1)There was no significant difference between the PUSH scores of the MDCC group(11.19±2.46)and CNC group(12.01±2.79)before the intervention(P>0.05),and the PUSH scores were lower after 2 and 4 wk of intervention in the MDCC group(6.63±1.97 and 3.11±1.04)than in the CNC group(8.78±2.13 and 4.96±1.35 points)(P<0.05);(2)The rate of wound healing in the MDCC group(96.77%)was higher than that in the CNC group(80.65%)(P<0.05);(3)There was no significant difference between the SPBS scores of emotional factors(21.15±3.11),economic factors(9.88±2.15),and physical factors(8.19±2.23)in the two groups before the intervention.The scores of emotional factors(13.51±1.88),economic factors(6.38±1.44),and physical factors(5.37±1.08)were lower in the MDCC group than in the CNC group(16.89±2.05,7.99±1.68 and 7.06±1.19)after 4 wk of intervention(P<0.05);and(4)Satisfaction with the intervention was higher in the MDCC group(93.55%)than in the CNC group(74.19%)(P<0.05).CONCLUSION Interventions for patients with cerebral infarction pressure wounds based on an MDCC treatment team can effectively reduce patients'self-perceived burden,improve pressure wound conditions,facilitate wound healing,and increase patient satisfaction with the intervention.
文摘AIM: To investigate the effect of the establishment of in-house multidisciplinary team (MDT) availability (iMDTa) on survival in upper gastrointestinal cancer (UGI) patients. METHODS: In 2001, a cancer centre with irradiation and chemotherapy facilities was established in the Norwegian county of West Agder with a change of iMDTa (WA/MDT-Change). "iMDTa"-status was defined according to the availability of the necessary specialists within one institution on one campus, serving the population of one county. We compared survival rates during 2000-2008 for UGI patients living in counties with (MDT-Yes), without (MDT-No), with a mix (MDT-Mix) and WA/MDT-Change. Survival was calculated with Kaplan-Meier method. Cox model was used to uncover differences between counties with different MDT status when adjusted for age, sex and stage. RESULTS: We analyzed 395 patients from WA/MDT-Change and compared their survival to 12 135 UGIpatients from four other Norwegian regions. Median overall survival for UGI patients in WA/MDT-Change increased from 129 to 300 d from 2000-2008, P = 0.001. The regions with the highest level of iMDTa achieved the largest decrease in risk of death for UGI cancers (compared to the county with MDT-Mix: MDT-Yes 11%, P <0.05 and WA/MDT-Change 15%, P < 0.05). Analyzing the different tumour entities separately, patients living in the WA/MDT-Change county reached a statisti-cally significant reduction in the risk of death [hazard ratios (HR)] compared to patients in the county with MDT-Mix for oesophageal and gastric, but not for pan-creatic cancer. HR for the study period 2000-2004 are given first and then for the period 2005-2008: The HR for oesophageal cancers was reduced from [HR = 1.12; 95%CI: 0.75-1.68 to HR = 0.60, 95%CI: 0.38-0.95] and for gastric cancers from [HR = 0.87, 95%CI: 0.66-1.15 to HR = 0.63, 95%CI: 0.43-0.93], but not for pancreatic cancer [HR = 1.04-, 95%CI: 0.83-1.3 for 2000-2004 and HR = 1.01, 95%CI: 0.78-1.3 for 2005-2008]. UGI patients treated during the second study period in the county of WA/MDT-Change had a higher probability of receiving chemotherapy. In the first study period, only one out of 43 patients (2.4%, 95%CI: 0-6.9) received chemotherapy, compared to 18 of 42 patients diagnosed during 2005-2008 (42.9%, 95%CI: 28.0-57.8). CONCLUSION: Introduction of iMDTa led to a two-fold increase of UGI patients, whereas no increase in survival was found in the MDT-No or MDT-Mix counties.
文摘2020年乳腺癌已成为全球发病率最高的恶性肿瘤,近年来随着诊疗技术的提升,中国乳腺癌患者生存率虽显著提高,但仍与西方国家存在较大差异。目前国内乳腺癌诊治仍存在诸多不足的地方,如院内缺少综合治疗的复合型医学人才、患者有效就诊时间短、就诊流程繁琐等。多学科团队诊疗(multidisciplinary team treatment,MDT)模式是由多个学科的资深专家团队合作,针对某一种或某一系统疾病的病例进行讨论,在综合各学科意见的基础上为患者制订出最佳治疗方案的诊疗模式。MDT已经逐渐被多个肿瘤治疗领域接受并广泛实施,很多常见肿瘤治愈率的提高是通过MDT实现的。该模式涉及方面广泛,包括医院制度化建设及核心科室和协同科室的专业合作等。其实施可以提高疾病的诊断率,减少误诊或漏诊,也可以提高指南实施规范性,从而在整体上提高以患者为中心的全病程管理能力及乳腺癌单病种科室的诊疗能力,最终助力《健康中国行动(2019—2030年)》实现。但全国各地MDT实施缺乏统一的流程及标准,国内外尚无专门针对乳腺癌单病种的MDT标准与规范,以指导并提升临床实践能力。本标准与规范由健康报社主办,中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会发起,在具有肿瘤诊疗相关专科的综合医院和肿瘤专科医院组织多学科专家,依据高级别循证医学依据,通过共同讨论形成赋能专科建设项目并制订《乳腺癌多学科诊疗标准与规范(2023年版)》。本标准与规范的具体内容包括:①乳腺癌MDT组织建设及运营机制的基本要求;②初诊(早期)乳腺癌患者MDT标准与规范;③复诊(复发转移性/初诊晚期)乳腺癌患者MDT标准与规范;④以患者为中心的MDT规范化标准诊疗流程;⑤乳腺癌MDT高质量发展的其他要求及建议。本标准与规范旨在从MDT所有参与的单学科或科室应该承担的职责出发,以患者为中心,提供一站式医疗服务,共同探索符合中国国情的MDT标准与规范,同时评选出优秀及标杆医院,以促进该领域的MDT进展,并进一步规范乳腺癌慢病化与规范化全程管理,最终推动乳腺癌领域的变革与进步,造福乳腺癌患者。
