This narrative review provides an overview of the utilization of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage(EUS-GBD)as a salvage approach in cases of unsuccessful conventional management.EUS-GBD is a minimally ...This narrative review provides an overview of the utilization of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage(EUS-GBD)as a salvage approach in cases of unsuccessful conventional management.EUS-GBD is a minimally invasive and effective technique for drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis with high risk of surgery.The procedure has demonstrated impressive technical and clinical success rates with low rates of adverse events,making it a safe and effective option for appropriate candidates.Furthermore,EUS-GBD can also serve as a rescue option for patients who have failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or EUS biliary drainage for relief of jaundice in malignant biliary stricture.However,patient selection is critical for the success of EUS-GBD,and proper patient selection and risk assessment are important to ensure the safety and efficacy of the procedure.As the field continues to evolve and mature,ongoing research will further refine our understanding of the benefits and limitations of EUS-GBD,ultimately leading to improved outcomes for patients.展开更多
BACKGROUND Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy(EUS-GE)has recently emerged as an alternative treatment for gastric outlet obstruction(GOO)in selected patients.AIM To report the initial experience of EUS-GE ...BACKGROUND Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy(EUS-GE)has recently emerged as an alternative treatment for gastric outlet obstruction(GOO)in selected patients.AIM To report the initial experience of EUS-GE in patients with GOO.METHODS This study was a retrospective,observational,multicenter study in which the data from 10 patients who underwent EUS-GE due to GOO between September 2021 and May 2023 were collected.We analyzed technical success,clinical success,adverse events,and survival.Technical success was defined as adequate positioning and deployment of the stent.Clinical success was defined as the patient’s ability to tolerate oral intake without vomiting 7 d after the procedure.Postprocedural adverse events were recorded.RESULTS Eleven procedures in 10 patients with GOO were included.The mean age of the patients was 67.5 years(range:56-77 years).Malignant GOO was present in 9 patients.Technical success was achieved in 9/11 procedures(82%).Among them,clinical success was achieved in 9 patients(100%).Adverse events occurred in 1 patient(9%).The median survival was 3 months(n=7;range:1-8 months).CONCLUSION EUS-GE is a feasible therapeutic option in the treatment of GOO.展开更多
BACKGROUND Fascia iliaca compartment block is a technique that blocks three nerves,similar to a 3-in-1 nerve block.This block provides analgesia for patients undergoing lower limb surgery,and is a simple technique tha...BACKGROUND Fascia iliaca compartment block is a technique that blocks three nerves,similar to a 3-in-1 nerve block.This block provides analgesia for patients undergoing lower limb surgery,and is a simple technique that is easy to implement.Here,we report a case of fascia iliaca compartment block in a patient with myocardial infarction who underwent emergency middle thigh amputation.CASE SUMMARY A 78-year-old female patient weighing 38 kg with gangrene and occlusive peripheral atherosclerosis of the right leg underwent an emergency middle thigh amputation.The patient had a history of hypertension,coronary heart disease,cerebral infarction,anterior wall myocardial infarction,and had recently undergone percutaneous coronary intervention consisting of coronary angiography and right coronary artery stent implantation.Considering the patient's condition,an ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block combined with general anesthesia was implemented for amputation.The fascia iliaca compartment block provided analgesia for the operation,and reduced the dosage of general anesthetics.It also alleviated adverse cardiovascular effects caused by pain stress,and ensured the safety of the patient during the perioperative period.This block also provided postoperative analgesia.The patient had a good prognosis,and was subsequently discharged from hospital.CONCLUSION Fascia iliaca compartment block provides surgical analgesia.It also alleviates adverse cardiovascular effects,and ensures patient safety during the perioperative period.展开更多
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is speculated to become the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality by 2030,a high mortality rate considering the number of cases.Surgery and chemotherapy are the main treatme...Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is speculated to become the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality by 2030,a high mortality rate considering the number of cases.Surgery and chemotherapy are the main treatment options,but they are burdensome for patients.A clear histological diagnosis is needed to determine a treatment plan,and endoscopic ultrasound(EUS)-guided tissue acquisition(TA)is a suitable technique that does not worsen the cancer-specific prognosis even for lesions at risk of needle tract seeding.With the development of personalized medicine and precision treatment,there has been an increasing demand to increase cell counts and collect specimens while preserving tissue structure,leading to the development of the fine-needle biopsy(FNB)needle.EUS-FNB is rapidly replacing EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration(FNA)as the procedure of choice for EUS-TA of pancreatic cancer.However,EUS-FNA is sometimes necessary where the FNB needle cannot penetrate small hard lesions,so it is important clinicians are familiar with both.Given these recent developments,we present an up-to-date review of the role of EUS-TA in pancreatic cancer.Particularly,technical aspects,such as needle caliber,negative pressure,and puncture methods,for obtaining an adequate specimen in EUS-TA are discussed.展开更多
The linear echoendoscope,introduced in the 1990s,opened the era of interventional endoscopic ultrasound(IEUS).The linear echoendoscope enabled EUS guided Fine Needle Aspiration(EUS-FNA) allowing the path of the needle...The linear echoendoscope,introduced in the 1990s,opened the era of interventional endoscopic ultrasound(IEUS).The linear echoendoscope enabled EUS guided Fine Needle Aspiration(EUS-FNA) allowing the path of the needle to be traced during the puncture process.After EUS-FNA,other interventional procedures were introduced in clinical practice.Tissue acquisition was the first EUS-guided interventional procedure and its higher diagnostic quality has undoubtedly been established.After EUS-FNA,Celiac plexus neurolysis(CPN) and block(CPB),pancreatic pseudocyst drainage,abdominal and mediastinal collections/abscesses drainage,and in selected cases,pancreatic and biliary ductal system drainage,were introduced in clinical practice.EUS-guided fine needle injection with local delivery of antitumor agents is considered a promising modality.We have reviewed published data on EUS guided interventional procedures with the object of summarizing the diagnostic capability of endoscopic ultrasound and elaborates in detail its therapeutic capability and potential.展开更多
There has been a growing interest in developing endoscopic ultrasound(EUS)-guided interventions for pancreatic cancer,some of which have become standard of care.There are two main factors that drive these advancements...There has been a growing interest in developing endoscopic ultrasound(EUS)-guided interventions for pancreatic cancer,some of which have become standard of care.There are two main factors that drive these advancements to facilitate treatment of patients with pancreatic cancer,ranging from direct locoregional therapy to palliation of symptoms related to inoperable pancreatic cancer.Firstly,an upper EUS has the capability to access the entire pancreas–lesions in the pancreatic head and uncinate process can be accessed from the duodenum,and lesions in the pancreatic body and tail can be accessed from the stomach.Secondly,there has been a robust development of devices that allow through-theneedle interventions,such as placement of fiducial markers,brachytherapy,intratumoral injection,gastroenterostomy creation,and ablation.While these techniques are rapidly emerging,data from a multicenter randomized controlled trial for some procedures are awaited prior to their adoption in clinical settings.展开更多
BACKGROUND Although several techniques for endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage(EUS-BD)are available at present,an optimal treatment algorithm of EUS-BD has not yet been established.AIM To evaluate the clinic...BACKGROUND Although several techniques for endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage(EUS-BD)are available at present,an optimal treatment algorithm of EUS-BD has not yet been established.AIM To evaluate the clinical utility of treatment method conversion during single endoscopic sessions for difficult cases in initially planned EUS-BD.METHODS This was a single-center retrospective analysis using a prospectively accumulated database.Patients with biliary obstruction undergoing EUS-BD between May 2008 and April 2016 were included.The primary outcome was to evaluate the improvement in EUS-BD success rates by converting the treatment methods during a single endoscopic session.Secondary outcomes were clarification of the factors leading to the conversion from the initial EUS-BD and the assessment of efficacy and safety of the conversion as judged by technical success,clinical success,and adverse events(AEs).RESULTS A total of 208 patients underwent EUS-BD during the study period.For 18.8%(39/208)of the patients,the treatment methods were converted to another EUSBD technique from the initial plan.Biliary obstruction was caused by pancreatobiliary malignancies,other malignant lesions,biliary stones,and other benign lesions in 22,11,4,and 2 patients,respectively.The reasons for the difficulty with the initial EUS-BD were classified into the following 3 procedures:Target puncture(n=13),guidewire manipulation(n=18),and puncture tract dilation(n=8).Technical success was achieved in 97.4%(38/39)of the cases and clinical success was achieved in 89.5%of patients(34/38).AEs occurred in 10.3%of patients,including bile leakage(n=2),bleeding(n=1),and cholecystitis(n=1).The puncture target and drainage technique were altered in subsequent EUSBD procedures in 25 and 14 patients,respectively.The final technical success rate with 95%CI for all 208 cases was 97.1%(95%CI:93.8%-98.9%),while that of the initially planned EUS-BD was 78.8%(95%CI:72.6%-84.2%).CONCLUSION Among multi-step procedures in EUS-BD,guidewire manipulation appeared to be the most technically challenging.When initially planned EUS-BD is technically difficult,treatment method conversion in a single endoscopic session may result in successful EUS-BD without leading to severe AEs.展开更多
BACKGROUND Preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy(NACRT)is applied for resectable pancreatic cancer(RPC).To maximize the efficacy of NACRT,it is essential to ensure the accurate placement of fiducial markers ...BACKGROUND Preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy(NACRT)is applied for resectable pancreatic cancer(RPC).To maximize the efficacy of NACRT,it is essential to ensure the accurate placement of fiducial markers for image-guided radiation.However,no standard method for delivering fiducial markers has been established to date,and the nature of RPC during NACRT remains unclear.AIM To determine the feasibility,safety and benefits of endoscopic ultrasound-guided(EUS)fiducial marker placement in patients with RPC.METHODS This was a prospective case series of 29 patients(mean age,67.5 years;62.1%male)with RPC referred to our facility for NACRT.Under EUS guidance,a single gold marker was placed into the tumor using either a 19-or 22-gauge fine-needle aspiration needle.The differences in daily marker positioning were measured by comparing simulation computed tomography and treatment computed tomography.RESULTS In all 29 patients(100%)who underwent EUS fiducial marker placement,fiducials were placed successfully with only minor,self-limiting bleeding during puncture observed in 2 patients(6.9%).NACRT was subsequently administered to all patients and completed in 28/29(96.6%)cases,with one patient experiencing repeat cholangitis.Spontaneous migration of gold markers was observed in 1 patient.Twenty-four patients(82.8%)had surgery with 91.7%(22/24)R0 resection,and two patients experienced complete remission.No inflammatory changes around the marker were observed in the surgical specimen.The daily position of gold markers showed large positional changes,particularly in the superior-inferior direction.Moreover,tumor location was affected by food and fluid intake as well as bowel gas,which changes daily.CONCLUSION EUS fiducial marker placement following NACRT for RPC is feasible and safe.The RPC is mobile and is affected by not only aspiration,but also food and fluid intake and bowel condition.展开更多
目的探讨股动脉穿刺介入术后穿刺部位出血的危险因素。方法检索从建库至2022年12月31日中国知网、万方、维普、中国生物医学文献服务系统数据库(CBM)、PubMed、Medline、The Cochrane Library、EMbase、Web of Science数据库中关于经股...目的探讨股动脉穿刺介入术后穿刺部位出血的危险因素。方法检索从建库至2022年12月31日中国知网、万方、维普、中国生物医学文献服务系统数据库(CBM)、PubMed、Medline、The Cochrane Library、EMbase、Web of Science数据库中关于经股动脉穿刺介入术后穿刺部位出血危险因素的观察性研究,包括横断面研究、病例对照和队列研究文献。采用Newcastle-Ottawa量表(NOS)评分对纳入研究的文献质量进行评价,应用RevMan 5.3软件对文献数据进行Meta分析。结果最终纳入文献8篇(总样本量35250例),术后出血组患者1410例,非出血组33840例。Meta分析结果显示,高龄(OR=2.71,95%CI=2.17~3.38)、女性(OR=4.26,95%CI=1.08~16.89)、高血压(OR=2.48,95%CI=1.69~3.63)、肥胖(OR=2.33,95%CI=1.59~3.42)、使用溶栓剂/抗凝剂/血小板拮抗剂(OR=2.95,95%CI=2.24~3.89)、人工按压(OR=6.78,95%CI=1.34~34.43)是股动脉穿刺介入术后穿刺部位出血的危险因素。结论高龄、女性、高血压、肥胖、使用溶栓剂/抗凝剂/血小板拮抗剂、人工按压是股动脉穿刺介入术后穿刺部位出血的危险因素。展开更多
文摘This narrative review provides an overview of the utilization of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage(EUS-GBD)as a salvage approach in cases of unsuccessful conventional management.EUS-GBD is a minimally invasive and effective technique for drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis with high risk of surgery.The procedure has demonstrated impressive technical and clinical success rates with low rates of adverse events,making it a safe and effective option for appropriate candidates.Furthermore,EUS-GBD can also serve as a rescue option for patients who have failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or EUS biliary drainage for relief of jaundice in malignant biliary stricture.However,patient selection is critical for the success of EUS-GBD,and proper patient selection and risk assessment are important to ensure the safety and efficacy of the procedure.As the field continues to evolve and mature,ongoing research will further refine our understanding of the benefits and limitations of EUS-GBD,ultimately leading to improved outcomes for patients.
文摘BACKGROUND Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy(EUS-GE)has recently emerged as an alternative treatment for gastric outlet obstruction(GOO)in selected patients.AIM To report the initial experience of EUS-GE in patients with GOO.METHODS This study was a retrospective,observational,multicenter study in which the data from 10 patients who underwent EUS-GE due to GOO between September 2021 and May 2023 were collected.We analyzed technical success,clinical success,adverse events,and survival.Technical success was defined as adequate positioning and deployment of the stent.Clinical success was defined as the patient’s ability to tolerate oral intake without vomiting 7 d after the procedure.Postprocedural adverse events were recorded.RESULTS Eleven procedures in 10 patients with GOO were included.The mean age of the patients was 67.5 years(range:56-77 years).Malignant GOO was present in 9 patients.Technical success was achieved in 9/11 procedures(82%).Among them,clinical success was achieved in 9 patients(100%).Adverse events occurred in 1 patient(9%).The median survival was 3 months(n=7;range:1-8 months).CONCLUSION EUS-GE is a feasible therapeutic option in the treatment of GOO.
文摘BACKGROUND Fascia iliaca compartment block is a technique that blocks three nerves,similar to a 3-in-1 nerve block.This block provides analgesia for patients undergoing lower limb surgery,and is a simple technique that is easy to implement.Here,we report a case of fascia iliaca compartment block in a patient with myocardial infarction who underwent emergency middle thigh amputation.CASE SUMMARY A 78-year-old female patient weighing 38 kg with gangrene and occlusive peripheral atherosclerosis of the right leg underwent an emergency middle thigh amputation.The patient had a history of hypertension,coronary heart disease,cerebral infarction,anterior wall myocardial infarction,and had recently undergone percutaneous coronary intervention consisting of coronary angiography and right coronary artery stent implantation.Considering the patient's condition,an ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block combined with general anesthesia was implemented for amputation.The fascia iliaca compartment block provided analgesia for the operation,and reduced the dosage of general anesthetics.It also alleviated adverse cardiovascular effects caused by pain stress,and ensured the safety of the patient during the perioperative period.This block also provided postoperative analgesia.The patient had a good prognosis,and was subsequently discharged from hospital.CONCLUSION Fascia iliaca compartment block provides surgical analgesia.It also alleviates adverse cardiovascular effects,and ensures patient safety during the perioperative period.
文摘Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is speculated to become the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality by 2030,a high mortality rate considering the number of cases.Surgery and chemotherapy are the main treatment options,but they are burdensome for patients.A clear histological diagnosis is needed to determine a treatment plan,and endoscopic ultrasound(EUS)-guided tissue acquisition(TA)is a suitable technique that does not worsen the cancer-specific prognosis even for lesions at risk of needle tract seeding.With the development of personalized medicine and precision treatment,there has been an increasing demand to increase cell counts and collect specimens while preserving tissue structure,leading to the development of the fine-needle biopsy(FNB)needle.EUS-FNB is rapidly replacing EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration(FNA)as the procedure of choice for EUS-TA of pancreatic cancer.However,EUS-FNA is sometimes necessary where the FNB needle cannot penetrate small hard lesions,so it is important clinicians are familiar with both.Given these recent developments,we present an up-to-date review of the role of EUS-TA in pancreatic cancer.Particularly,technical aspects,such as needle caliber,negative pressure,and puncture methods,for obtaining an adequate specimen in EUS-TA are discussed.
文摘The linear echoendoscope,introduced in the 1990s,opened the era of interventional endoscopic ultrasound(IEUS).The linear echoendoscope enabled EUS guided Fine Needle Aspiration(EUS-FNA) allowing the path of the needle to be traced during the puncture process.After EUS-FNA,other interventional procedures were introduced in clinical practice.Tissue acquisition was the first EUS-guided interventional procedure and its higher diagnostic quality has undoubtedly been established.After EUS-FNA,Celiac plexus neurolysis(CPN) and block(CPB),pancreatic pseudocyst drainage,abdominal and mediastinal collections/abscesses drainage,and in selected cases,pancreatic and biliary ductal system drainage,were introduced in clinical practice.EUS-guided fine needle injection with local delivery of antitumor agents is considered a promising modality.We have reviewed published data on EUS guided interventional procedures with the object of summarizing the diagnostic capability of endoscopic ultrasound and elaborates in detail its therapeutic capability and potential.
文摘There has been a growing interest in developing endoscopic ultrasound(EUS)-guided interventions for pancreatic cancer,some of which have become standard of care.There are two main factors that drive these advancements to facilitate treatment of patients with pancreatic cancer,ranging from direct locoregional therapy to palliation of symptoms related to inoperable pancreatic cancer.Firstly,an upper EUS has the capability to access the entire pancreas–lesions in the pancreatic head and uncinate process can be accessed from the duodenum,and lesions in the pancreatic body and tail can be accessed from the stomach.Secondly,there has been a robust development of devices that allow through-theneedle interventions,such as placement of fiducial markers,brachytherapy,intratumoral injection,gastroenterostomy creation,and ablation.While these techniques are rapidly emerging,data from a multicenter randomized controlled trial for some procedures are awaited prior to their adoption in clinical settings.
文摘BACKGROUND Although several techniques for endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage(EUS-BD)are available at present,an optimal treatment algorithm of EUS-BD has not yet been established.AIM To evaluate the clinical utility of treatment method conversion during single endoscopic sessions for difficult cases in initially planned EUS-BD.METHODS This was a single-center retrospective analysis using a prospectively accumulated database.Patients with biliary obstruction undergoing EUS-BD between May 2008 and April 2016 were included.The primary outcome was to evaluate the improvement in EUS-BD success rates by converting the treatment methods during a single endoscopic session.Secondary outcomes were clarification of the factors leading to the conversion from the initial EUS-BD and the assessment of efficacy and safety of the conversion as judged by technical success,clinical success,and adverse events(AEs).RESULTS A total of 208 patients underwent EUS-BD during the study period.For 18.8%(39/208)of the patients,the treatment methods were converted to another EUSBD technique from the initial plan.Biliary obstruction was caused by pancreatobiliary malignancies,other malignant lesions,biliary stones,and other benign lesions in 22,11,4,and 2 patients,respectively.The reasons for the difficulty with the initial EUS-BD were classified into the following 3 procedures:Target puncture(n=13),guidewire manipulation(n=18),and puncture tract dilation(n=8).Technical success was achieved in 97.4%(38/39)of the cases and clinical success was achieved in 89.5%of patients(34/38).AEs occurred in 10.3%of patients,including bile leakage(n=2),bleeding(n=1),and cholecystitis(n=1).The puncture target and drainage technique were altered in subsequent EUSBD procedures in 25 and 14 patients,respectively.The final technical success rate with 95%CI for all 208 cases was 97.1%(95%CI:93.8%-98.9%),while that of the initially planned EUS-BD was 78.8%(95%CI:72.6%-84.2%).CONCLUSION Among multi-step procedures in EUS-BD,guidewire manipulation appeared to be the most technically challenging.When initially planned EUS-BD is technically difficult,treatment method conversion in a single endoscopic session may result in successful EUS-BD without leading to severe AEs.
基金the JSPS KAKENHI Grant[Grant-in Aid for Scientific Research(B)],No.15H04913。
文摘BACKGROUND Preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy(NACRT)is applied for resectable pancreatic cancer(RPC).To maximize the efficacy of NACRT,it is essential to ensure the accurate placement of fiducial markers for image-guided radiation.However,no standard method for delivering fiducial markers has been established to date,and the nature of RPC during NACRT remains unclear.AIM To determine the feasibility,safety and benefits of endoscopic ultrasound-guided(EUS)fiducial marker placement in patients with RPC.METHODS This was a prospective case series of 29 patients(mean age,67.5 years;62.1%male)with RPC referred to our facility for NACRT.Under EUS guidance,a single gold marker was placed into the tumor using either a 19-or 22-gauge fine-needle aspiration needle.The differences in daily marker positioning were measured by comparing simulation computed tomography and treatment computed tomography.RESULTS In all 29 patients(100%)who underwent EUS fiducial marker placement,fiducials were placed successfully with only minor,self-limiting bleeding during puncture observed in 2 patients(6.9%).NACRT was subsequently administered to all patients and completed in 28/29(96.6%)cases,with one patient experiencing repeat cholangitis.Spontaneous migration of gold markers was observed in 1 patient.Twenty-four patients(82.8%)had surgery with 91.7%(22/24)R0 resection,and two patients experienced complete remission.No inflammatory changes around the marker were observed in the surgical specimen.The daily position of gold markers showed large positional changes,particularly in the superior-inferior direction.Moreover,tumor location was affected by food and fluid intake as well as bowel gas,which changes daily.CONCLUSION EUS fiducial marker placement following NACRT for RPC is feasible and safe.The RPC is mobile and is affected by not only aspiration,but also food and fluid intake and bowel condition.