Purpose: Research on clinical application effect of combining very low birth weight newborn (VLBWN) umbilical vein catheterization (UVC) with peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). Method: 60 cases of VLBWN ch...Purpose: Research on clinical application effect of combining very low birth weight newborn (VLBWN) umbilical vein catheterization (UVC) with peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). Method: 60 cases of VLBWN checked in our hospital’s ICU are selected and divided into combination group (n = 30) and PICC group (n = 30) according to the random number table. Combination of UVC and PICC is applied on newborn of combination group while only PICC is applied on newborn of PICC group. These two groups’ newborn’s PICC catheterization operation time, PICC indwelling time, weight gain, hospital stays, hospital infection, planned extubation, successful single puncture, adverse events and other indexes are observed. Result: Newborns in combination group have less PICC catheterization operation time and less hospital stays than newborns in PICC group while newborns in combination group have longer PICC indwelling time and greater weight gain than newborns in PICC group. The difference here has statistical significance (p < 0.05). Combination group’s hospital infection ratio (3.33%) is lower than that of PICC group (23.33%). The difference here has statistical significance (p < 0.05). Newborns in combination group have a planned extubation rate of 93.33% and a successful single puncture rate of 93.33%, which are greater than those of newborn in PICC group (respectively 73.33% and 70.00%). The difference here has statistical significance (p < 0.05). Newborns in combination group have an adverse event occurrence rate of 43.33%, lower than that of PICC group (70.00%). The difference here has statistical significance (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Application of combination of UVC and PICC on VLBWN can greatly improve PICC catheterization efficiency and newborn patients’ nutriture and reduce rate of complications, thus, it is worthy of clinical application.展开更多
BACKGROUND The use of umbilical venous catheters(UVCs)in the perinatal period may be associated with severe complications,including the occurrence of portal vein thrombosis(PVT).AIM To assess the incidence of UVC-rela...BACKGROUND The use of umbilical venous catheters(UVCs)in the perinatal period may be associated with severe complications,including the occurrence of portal vein thrombosis(PVT).AIM To assess the incidence of UVC-related PVT in infants with postnatal age up to three months.METHODS A systematic and comprehensive database searching(PubMed,Cochrane Library,Scopus,Web of Science)was performed for studies from 1980 to 2020(the search was last updated on November 28,2020).We included in the final analyses all peer-reviewed prospective cohort studies,retrospective cohort studies and casecontrol studies.The reference lists of included articles were hand-searched to identify additional studies of interest.Studies were considered eligible when they included infants with postnatal age up to three months with UVC-associated PVT.Incidence estimates were pooled by using random effects meta-analyses.The quality of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.The systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis(PRISMA)guidelines.RESULTS Overall,16 studies were considered eligible and included in the final analyses.The data confirmed the relevant risk of UVC-related thrombosis.The mean pooled incidence of such condition was 12%,although it varied across studies(0%-49%).In 15/16 studies(94%),diagnosis of thrombosis was made accidentally during routine screening controls,whilst in 1/16 study(6%)targeted imaging assessments were carried out in neonates with clinical concerns for a thrombus.Tip position was investigated by abdominal ultrasound(US)alone in 1/16(6%)studies,by a combination of radiography and abdominal US in 14/16(88%)studies and by a combination of radiography,abdominal US and echocardiography in 1/16(6%)studies.CONCLUSION To the best of our knowledge,this is the first systematic review specifically investigating the incidence of UVC-related PVT.The use of UVCs requires a high index of suspicion,because its use is significantly associated with PVT.Well-designed prospective studies are required to assess the optimal approach to prevent UVCrelated thrombosis of the portal system.展开更多
BACKGROUND Reports of necrotizing enterocolitis(NEC)caused by umbilical arterial catheter(UAC)-associated abdominal aortic embolism in neonates are rare.Herein,we report the case of an extremely low birth weight(ELBW)...BACKGROUND Reports of necrotizing enterocolitis(NEC)caused by umbilical arterial catheter(UAC)-associated abdominal aortic embolism in neonates are rare.Herein,we report the case of an extremely low birth weight(ELBW)infant with NEC caused by UAC-associated abdominal aortic embolism.CASE SUMMARY A female infant,aged 21 min and weighing 830 g at 28+6 wk of gestational age,was referred to our hospital because of premature birth and shallow breathing.The patient was diagnosed with ELBW,neonatal respiratory distress syndrome,neonatal intrauterine infection,and neonatal asphyxia.Umbilical arterial and venous catheters were inserted on the day after birth and were removed 9 d later,according to the doctor’s plan.Within 48 h after extubation,the patient’s manifestations included poor responsiveness,heart rate range of 175-185/min,and currant jelly stool.Therefore,we considered a diagnosis of NEC.To determine the cause,we used B-mode ultrasound,which revealed a partial abdominal aortic embolism(2 cm×0.3 cm)and abdominal effusion.The patient was treated with nil per os,gastrointestinal decompression,anti-infective therapy,blood transfusion,and low-molecular-weight heparin sodium q12h for anticoagulant therapy(from May 20 to June 1,the dosage of low-molecular-weight heparin sodium was adjusted according to the anti-Xa activity during treatment).On the 67th day after admission,the patient fully recovered and was discharged.CONCLUSION The abdominal aortic thrombosis in this patient was considered to be catheter related,which requires immediate treatment once diagnosed.The choice of treatment should be determined according to the location of the thrombus and the patient’s condition.展开更多
Introduction: It is not known whether prone position of newborns with umbilical catheters increases the complication risk. Purpose: Analysing complications of umbilical catheters in newborns during prone positioning a...Introduction: It is not known whether prone position of newborns with umbilical catheters increases the complication risk. Purpose: Analysing complications of umbilical catheters in newborns during prone positioning and analysing if local complications as a wet or red rim increase severe complications. Subjects: Newborns (展开更多
背景近年来中国极早产儿救治数量显著增加,中心血管导管已成为国内NICU的常用技术,极早产儿救治中可能存在中心血管导管的不合理使用,但目前尚缺乏其使用现况数据。目的通过回顾采集和分析中国新生儿协作网(CHNN)数据库正式运行第1年极...背景近年来中国极早产儿救治数量显著增加,中心血管导管已成为国内NICU的常用技术,极早产儿救治中可能存在中心血管导管的不合理使用,但目前尚缺乏其使用现况数据。目的通过回顾采集和分析中国新生儿协作网(CHNN)数据库正式运行第1年极早产儿中心血管置管现况,并对各医院进行问卷调查,以期发现当前极早产儿中心血管导管使用中存在的问题,为后续质量改进提供基线数据。设计横断面调查。方法基于2019年CHNN成员医院登记的极早产儿中心血管导管数据,描述不同出生胎龄早产儿中心血管导管使用状况(置管率、留置时间),问卷调查CHNN成员医院中心血管导管病房规范及管理、置管指征、拔除指征、维护实践和并发症情况。纳入CHNN数据库中入院日期在2019年1月1日至2019年12月31日、生后24 h内收入NICU、出生胎龄24^(+0)~31^(+6)周的极早产儿连续病例;排除存在严重先天性畸形者,治疗未结束时转至非CHNN医院者,未达到医生建议的出院标准家长主动选择终止维持生命支持的治疗并出院者;剔除病例纳入不完整或数据质量不合格的成员医院的数据。根据胎龄分为24~28周和~31周亚组。根据医院类型分为儿童专科医院、妇幼保健院和综合医院。自行设计问卷,调查病房规范及管理、留置及拔除指征、中心血管导管维护、中心血管导管相关并发症现况,由NICU主任或经主任授权的高年资新生儿专科医生填写问卷。主要结局指标中心血管导管置管类型、置管率和留置时间。结果(1)CHNN成员57家三级医院NICU 6532例极早产儿进入本文分析,留置中心血管导管4563例(69.9%),其中脐动脉导管(UAC)368例(5.6%)、脐静脉导管(UVC)2532例(38.8%)、经外周穿刺中心静脉置管(PICC)3895例(59.6%)和外科中心静脉置管(SCVC)55例(0.8%)。相对于未留置中心血管导管患儿,留置中心血管导管患儿的胎龄小、出生体重低、小于胎龄儿比例高、多胎比例高、本院出生比例低及5 min Apgar评分<7分比例高(P均<0.01),同时其母亲妊娠高血压、产前激素使用以及剖宫产比例均较高(P均<0.01)。留置与未留置中心血管导管极早产儿相比,病死率差异无统计学意义,但各项并发症更多,住院时间更长,差异有统计学意义。(2)任意中心血管导管置管率总体呈现随胎龄增加而下降的趋势,胎龄24~28周亚组和~31周亚组中心血管导管置管率分别为87.8%和63.1%。UAC和UVC置管率随胎龄增加而下降。PICC置管率随胎龄呈哑铃状,胎龄25~28周置管率最高(75.2%~85.5%),但仍有52.8%的胎龄~31周亚组患儿留置。留置≥2类中心静脉置管(UVC以及PICC或SCVC)占29.0%,随胎龄增加而下降,胎龄~31周亚组占21.8%。(3)UAC、UVC和PICC中位留置时间分别为6(4~8)d、7(4~9)d和22(15~31)d。不同类型医院CHNN成员医院中心血管导管置管率及留置时间差别显著。(4)共发放问卷57份,回收52份(91.2%),50%CHNN成员医院对中心血管导管管理有病房规范文件。在各类导管的留置指征、拔除指征、最长留置天数上存在单位间差异。62%和23%的CHNN成员医院在近1年内发生过中心血管导管相关的渗漏和血栓并发症。结论国内NICU中极早产儿中心血管导管留置较为普及,存在过度置管和置管不足共存、PICC置管时间过长、CHNN成员医院差异大等主要问题。亟需建立统一指南和规范,并通过质量控制和质量改进,促进更加合理、规范的中心血管导管使用。展开更多
文摘Purpose: Research on clinical application effect of combining very low birth weight newborn (VLBWN) umbilical vein catheterization (UVC) with peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). Method: 60 cases of VLBWN checked in our hospital’s ICU are selected and divided into combination group (n = 30) and PICC group (n = 30) according to the random number table. Combination of UVC and PICC is applied on newborn of combination group while only PICC is applied on newborn of PICC group. These two groups’ newborn’s PICC catheterization operation time, PICC indwelling time, weight gain, hospital stays, hospital infection, planned extubation, successful single puncture, adverse events and other indexes are observed. Result: Newborns in combination group have less PICC catheterization operation time and less hospital stays than newborns in PICC group while newborns in combination group have longer PICC indwelling time and greater weight gain than newborns in PICC group. The difference here has statistical significance (p < 0.05). Combination group’s hospital infection ratio (3.33%) is lower than that of PICC group (23.33%). The difference here has statistical significance (p < 0.05). Newborns in combination group have a planned extubation rate of 93.33% and a successful single puncture rate of 93.33%, which are greater than those of newborn in PICC group (respectively 73.33% and 70.00%). The difference here has statistical significance (p < 0.05). Newborns in combination group have an adverse event occurrence rate of 43.33%, lower than that of PICC group (70.00%). The difference here has statistical significance (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Application of combination of UVC and PICC on VLBWN can greatly improve PICC catheterization efficiency and newborn patients’ nutriture and reduce rate of complications, thus, it is worthy of clinical application.
文摘BACKGROUND The use of umbilical venous catheters(UVCs)in the perinatal period may be associated with severe complications,including the occurrence of portal vein thrombosis(PVT).AIM To assess the incidence of UVC-related PVT in infants with postnatal age up to three months.METHODS A systematic and comprehensive database searching(PubMed,Cochrane Library,Scopus,Web of Science)was performed for studies from 1980 to 2020(the search was last updated on November 28,2020).We included in the final analyses all peer-reviewed prospective cohort studies,retrospective cohort studies and casecontrol studies.The reference lists of included articles were hand-searched to identify additional studies of interest.Studies were considered eligible when they included infants with postnatal age up to three months with UVC-associated PVT.Incidence estimates were pooled by using random effects meta-analyses.The quality of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.The systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis(PRISMA)guidelines.RESULTS Overall,16 studies were considered eligible and included in the final analyses.The data confirmed the relevant risk of UVC-related thrombosis.The mean pooled incidence of such condition was 12%,although it varied across studies(0%-49%).In 15/16 studies(94%),diagnosis of thrombosis was made accidentally during routine screening controls,whilst in 1/16 study(6%)targeted imaging assessments were carried out in neonates with clinical concerns for a thrombus.Tip position was investigated by abdominal ultrasound(US)alone in 1/16(6%)studies,by a combination of radiography and abdominal US in 14/16(88%)studies and by a combination of radiography,abdominal US and echocardiography in 1/16(6%)studies.CONCLUSION To the best of our knowledge,this is the first systematic review specifically investigating the incidence of UVC-related PVT.The use of UVCs requires a high index of suspicion,because its use is significantly associated with PVT.Well-designed prospective studies are required to assess the optimal approach to prevent UVCrelated thrombosis of the portal system.
基金Supported by the 2020 Scientific Research Project of the Sichuan Health and Family Planning Commission,No.20PJ081.
文摘BACKGROUND Reports of necrotizing enterocolitis(NEC)caused by umbilical arterial catheter(UAC)-associated abdominal aortic embolism in neonates are rare.Herein,we report the case of an extremely low birth weight(ELBW)infant with NEC caused by UAC-associated abdominal aortic embolism.CASE SUMMARY A female infant,aged 21 min and weighing 830 g at 28+6 wk of gestational age,was referred to our hospital because of premature birth and shallow breathing.The patient was diagnosed with ELBW,neonatal respiratory distress syndrome,neonatal intrauterine infection,and neonatal asphyxia.Umbilical arterial and venous catheters were inserted on the day after birth and were removed 9 d later,according to the doctor’s plan.Within 48 h after extubation,the patient’s manifestations included poor responsiveness,heart rate range of 175-185/min,and currant jelly stool.Therefore,we considered a diagnosis of NEC.To determine the cause,we used B-mode ultrasound,which revealed a partial abdominal aortic embolism(2 cm×0.3 cm)and abdominal effusion.The patient was treated with nil per os,gastrointestinal decompression,anti-infective therapy,blood transfusion,and low-molecular-weight heparin sodium q12h for anticoagulant therapy(from May 20 to June 1,the dosage of low-molecular-weight heparin sodium was adjusted according to the anti-Xa activity during treatment).On the 67th day after admission,the patient fully recovered and was discharged.CONCLUSION The abdominal aortic thrombosis in this patient was considered to be catheter related,which requires immediate treatment once diagnosed.The choice of treatment should be determined according to the location of the thrombus and the patient’s condition.
文摘Introduction: It is not known whether prone position of newborns with umbilical catheters increases the complication risk. Purpose: Analysing complications of umbilical catheters in newborns during prone positioning and analysing if local complications as a wet or red rim increase severe complications. Subjects: Newborns (
文摘背景近年来中国极早产儿救治数量显著增加,中心血管导管已成为国内NICU的常用技术,极早产儿救治中可能存在中心血管导管的不合理使用,但目前尚缺乏其使用现况数据。目的通过回顾采集和分析中国新生儿协作网(CHNN)数据库正式运行第1年极早产儿中心血管置管现况,并对各医院进行问卷调查,以期发现当前极早产儿中心血管导管使用中存在的问题,为后续质量改进提供基线数据。设计横断面调查。方法基于2019年CHNN成员医院登记的极早产儿中心血管导管数据,描述不同出生胎龄早产儿中心血管导管使用状况(置管率、留置时间),问卷调查CHNN成员医院中心血管导管病房规范及管理、置管指征、拔除指征、维护实践和并发症情况。纳入CHNN数据库中入院日期在2019年1月1日至2019年12月31日、生后24 h内收入NICU、出生胎龄24^(+0)~31^(+6)周的极早产儿连续病例;排除存在严重先天性畸形者,治疗未结束时转至非CHNN医院者,未达到医生建议的出院标准家长主动选择终止维持生命支持的治疗并出院者;剔除病例纳入不完整或数据质量不合格的成员医院的数据。根据胎龄分为24~28周和~31周亚组。根据医院类型分为儿童专科医院、妇幼保健院和综合医院。自行设计问卷,调查病房规范及管理、留置及拔除指征、中心血管导管维护、中心血管导管相关并发症现况,由NICU主任或经主任授权的高年资新生儿专科医生填写问卷。主要结局指标中心血管导管置管类型、置管率和留置时间。结果(1)CHNN成员57家三级医院NICU 6532例极早产儿进入本文分析,留置中心血管导管4563例(69.9%),其中脐动脉导管(UAC)368例(5.6%)、脐静脉导管(UVC)2532例(38.8%)、经外周穿刺中心静脉置管(PICC)3895例(59.6%)和外科中心静脉置管(SCVC)55例(0.8%)。相对于未留置中心血管导管患儿,留置中心血管导管患儿的胎龄小、出生体重低、小于胎龄儿比例高、多胎比例高、本院出生比例低及5 min Apgar评分<7分比例高(P均<0.01),同时其母亲妊娠高血压、产前激素使用以及剖宫产比例均较高(P均<0.01)。留置与未留置中心血管导管极早产儿相比,病死率差异无统计学意义,但各项并发症更多,住院时间更长,差异有统计学意义。(2)任意中心血管导管置管率总体呈现随胎龄增加而下降的趋势,胎龄24~28周亚组和~31周亚组中心血管导管置管率分别为87.8%和63.1%。UAC和UVC置管率随胎龄增加而下降。PICC置管率随胎龄呈哑铃状,胎龄25~28周置管率最高(75.2%~85.5%),但仍有52.8%的胎龄~31周亚组患儿留置。留置≥2类中心静脉置管(UVC以及PICC或SCVC)占29.0%,随胎龄增加而下降,胎龄~31周亚组占21.8%。(3)UAC、UVC和PICC中位留置时间分别为6(4~8)d、7(4~9)d和22(15~31)d。不同类型医院CHNN成员医院中心血管导管置管率及留置时间差别显著。(4)共发放问卷57份,回收52份(91.2%),50%CHNN成员医院对中心血管导管管理有病房规范文件。在各类导管的留置指征、拔除指征、最长留置天数上存在单位间差异。62%和23%的CHNN成员医院在近1年内发生过中心血管导管相关的渗漏和血栓并发症。结论国内NICU中极早产儿中心血管导管留置较为普及,存在过度置管和置管不足共存、PICC置管时间过长、CHNN成员医院差异大等主要问题。亟需建立统一指南和规范,并通过质量控制和质量改进,促进更加合理、规范的中心血管导管使用。
