Aims: To audit the use and outcomes of using PICC lines in hemato-oncological patients. Objectives: To study the demographics of patients: ?studying the use of PICC line in hemato-oncological patients;studying the rat...Aims: To audit the use and outcomes of using PICC lines in hemato-oncological patients. Objectives: To study the demographics of patients: ?studying the use of PICC line in hemato-oncological patients;studying the rate of complications in PICC line;studying the cause of early removal of PICC line. Methods: All PICCs inserted in adult hemato-oncological patients in Hematology and Medical Oncology Department of Health Care Global (HCG) Hospital were studied prospectively, as per the proforma, till PICCs were removed or patient expired and the pattern of complications were noted. Results: Eighty-four PICCs were inserted over a period of initial nine months and followed for a total of 1 year with three months post insertion duration for a total of 10,868 catheter-days (mean of 129 days i.e. 4.3 months, range: 1 to 288 days). The most common indication for PICC was chemotherapy (100%). Among them 19 (22%) PICCs had complications and 12 were removed at the rate of 1.1/1000 PICC-days. Complications with haematologic malignancies were more as compared to those with solid tissue malignancies. Conclusions: Despite significant complication rates, PICCs are a relatively safe and cost effective mode of establishing central venous access.展开更多
目的探讨三种经外周静脉穿刺置入中心静脉导管(periperally inserted central catheter,PICC)置管方法的临床应用效果。方法便利抽样法选择2014年1月至2016年7月盐城市第一人民医院肿瘤科收治的需要PICC置管的90例患者为研究对象,按入...目的探讨三种经外周静脉穿刺置入中心静脉导管(periperally inserted central catheter,PICC)置管方法的临床应用效果。方法便利抽样法选择2014年1月至2016年7月盐城市第一人民医院肿瘤科收治的需要PICC置管的90例患者为研究对象,按入院先后将其分为传统的PICC置管组、改良塞丁格技术的盲穿组、血管超声引导下结合改良塞丁格技术组,每组各30例,分析并比较三组患者一次性置管成功率、置管期间的穿刺点局部渗血、静脉炎、静脉血栓的发生率,置管使用的时间等。结果血管超声引导下的结合改良塞丁格技术的PICC置管的一次性置管成功率、穿刺点局部渗血、静脉炎、静脉血栓的发生率及置管时间等均优于传统的PICC置管组和改良的塞丁格技术盲穿组(均P<0.05)。结论血管超声引导下的结合改良塞丁格技术的PICC置管极大地提高了一次性穿刺的成功率、减少了局部组织损伤和出血等并发症的发生、在预防机械性静脉炎和静脉血栓方面有着显著的效果,缩短了置管使用的时间,有利于提高患者的满意度,是临床上目前值得推广应用的一种PICC置管方法。展开更多
文摘Aims: To audit the use and outcomes of using PICC lines in hemato-oncological patients. Objectives: To study the demographics of patients: ?studying the use of PICC line in hemato-oncological patients;studying the rate of complications in PICC line;studying the cause of early removal of PICC line. Methods: All PICCs inserted in adult hemato-oncological patients in Hematology and Medical Oncology Department of Health Care Global (HCG) Hospital were studied prospectively, as per the proforma, till PICCs were removed or patient expired and the pattern of complications were noted. Results: Eighty-four PICCs were inserted over a period of initial nine months and followed for a total of 1 year with three months post insertion duration for a total of 10,868 catheter-days (mean of 129 days i.e. 4.3 months, range: 1 to 288 days). The most common indication for PICC was chemotherapy (100%). Among them 19 (22%) PICCs had complications and 12 were removed at the rate of 1.1/1000 PICC-days. Complications with haematologic malignancies were more as compared to those with solid tissue malignancies. Conclusions: Despite significant complication rates, PICCs are a relatively safe and cost effective mode of establishing central venous access.
文摘目的探讨三种经外周静脉穿刺置入中心静脉导管(periperally inserted central catheter,PICC)置管方法的临床应用效果。方法便利抽样法选择2014年1月至2016年7月盐城市第一人民医院肿瘤科收治的需要PICC置管的90例患者为研究对象,按入院先后将其分为传统的PICC置管组、改良塞丁格技术的盲穿组、血管超声引导下结合改良塞丁格技术组,每组各30例,分析并比较三组患者一次性置管成功率、置管期间的穿刺点局部渗血、静脉炎、静脉血栓的发生率,置管使用的时间等。结果血管超声引导下的结合改良塞丁格技术的PICC置管的一次性置管成功率、穿刺点局部渗血、静脉炎、静脉血栓的发生率及置管时间等均优于传统的PICC置管组和改良的塞丁格技术盲穿组(均P<0.05)。结论血管超声引导下的结合改良塞丁格技术的PICC置管极大地提高了一次性穿刺的成功率、减少了局部组织损伤和出血等并发症的发生、在预防机械性静脉炎和静脉血栓方面有着显著的效果,缩短了置管使用的时间,有利于提高患者的满意度,是临床上目前值得推广应用的一种PICC置管方法。
