Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures(OVCFs)are the most common fragility fracture and significantly influence the quality of life in the elderly.Currently,the literature lacks a comprehensive narrative review ...Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures(OVCFs)are the most common fragility fracture and significantly influence the quality of life in the elderly.Currently,the literature lacks a comprehensive narrative review of the management of OVCFs.The purpose of this study is to review background information,diagnosis,and surgical and non-surgical management of the OVCFs.A comprehensive search of PubMed and Google Scholar for articles in the English language between 1980 and 2021 was performed.Combinations of the following terms were used:compression fractures,vertebral compression fractures,osteoporosis,osteoporotic compression fractures,vertebroplasty,kyphoplasty,bisphosphonates,calcitonin,and osteoporosis treatments.Additional articles were also included by examining the reference list of articles found in the search.OVCFs,especially those that occur over long periods,can be asymptomatic.Symptoms of acute OVCFs include pain localized to the mid-line spine,a loss in height,and decreased mobility.The primary treatment regimens are pain control,medication management,vertebral augmentation,and anterior or posterior decompression and reconstructions.Pain control can be achieved with acetaminophen or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for mild pain or opioids and/or calcitonin for moderate to severe pain.Bisphosphonates and denosumab are the first-line treatments for osteoporosis.Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are reserved for patients who have not found symptomatic relief through conservative methods and are effective in achieving pain relief.Vertebroplasty is less technical and cheaper than kyphoplasty but could have more complications.Calcium and vitamin D supplementation can have a protective and therapeutic effect.Management of OVCFs must be combined with multiple approaches.Appropriate exercises and activity modification are important in fracture prevention.Medication with different mechanisms of action is a critical long-term causal treatment strategy.The minimally invasive surgical interventions such as vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are reserved for patients not responsive to conservative therapy and are recognized as efficient stopgap treatment methods.Posterior decompression and fixation or Anterior decompression and reconstruction may be required if neurological deficits are present.The detailed pathogenesis and related targeted treatment options still need to be developed for better clinical outcomes.展开更多
BACKGROUND Osteoporosis with vertebral compression fractures is increasingly common in the elderly population.Cement augmentation is one of the effective surgical treatments for these patients.Currently,there are seve...BACKGROUND Osteoporosis with vertebral compression fractures is increasingly common in the elderly population.Cement augmentation is one of the effective surgical treatments for these patients.Currently,there are several different types of cement augmentation treatments.No studies have compared the safety and efficacy of different cement augmentation types for the treatment of such fractures;thus,we retrospectively compared vertebroplasty,balloon kyphoplasty,and kyphoplasty with SpineJack or an intravertebral expandable pillar.AIM To compare the postoperative safety and efficacy of each surgical intervention in treating vertebral compression fractures.METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 354 patients with acute vertebral compression fractures,defined as signal changes in the T1 weighted magnetic resonance imaging,and randomly divided the patients into five groups.Their visual analog scale scores for pain,kyphotic angle,average body height,rate of cement leakage,and occurrence of adjacent vertebral compression fractures were followed for 1 year.One-way analysis of variance,the post hoc Bonferroni test,and Fisher exact probability test were used for statistical analyses.RESULTS All pain scores significantly improved 12 mo postoperatively;however,there was no significant difference between the groups(P=0.325).Kyphoplasty with SpineJack significantly reduced the kyphotic angle(P=0.028)and restored the height of the vertebral body(P=0.02).The rate of adjacent compression fractures was the highest in the vertebroplasty group,with a statistically significant difference according to the Fisher exact probability test(P=0.02).The treatment with the lowest cement leakage rate cannot be identified because of the small sample size;however,kyphoplasty with SpineJack,an IVEP,and vesselplasty resulted in lower rates of cement leakage than balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty.CONCLUSION Kyphoplasty with SpineJack has good outcomes in kyphotic angle reduction and body height restoration.Vertebroplasty has the highest cement leakage rate and adjacent compression fracture occurrence.展开更多
Purpose: Osteoporotic vertebral fractures with no sign of vertebral collapse on initial radiographs, which is so-called occult vertebral fractures (VFs), exist. Occult VFs have a high rate of missed diagnosis, and the...Purpose: Osteoporotic vertebral fractures with no sign of vertebral collapse on initial radiographs, which is so-called occult vertebral fractures (VFs), exist. Occult VFs have a high rate of missed diagnosis, and the treatment of these fractures has rarely been discussed in the literature. We evaluated the effects of vertebral bone drilling for the pain due to occults VFs. Materials and Methods: Eighteen patients with painful osteoporotic occult VFs underwent the vertebral bone drilling. We evaluated the clinical outcome by comparing numerical rating scale (NRS) and activity of daily life (ADL) values between before and after the vertebral bone drilling. Comparisons were made by using Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results: The mean baseline NRS and ADL score, and the mean NRS and ALD score after the bone drilling were 8.4 ± 0.8, 2.2 ± 0.6, 2.4 ± 1.0, 4.6 ± 0.5, respectively. Among the patients, we detected significant improvements in NRS pain score and ADL score after the drilling compared with baseline score (p < 0.0002). Conclusion: Vertebral bone drilling at the site of painful vertebral compression fractures alleviated the intractable pain due to osteoporotic occult VFs.展开更多
The aim of this review is to compare the effectiveness of percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty to treat pain and improve functional outcome from ver-tebral fractures secondary to osteoporosis and tumor conditio...The aim of this review is to compare the effectiveness of percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty to treat pain and improve functional outcome from ver-tebral fractures secondary to osteoporosis and tumor conditions. In 2009, two open randomized controlled trials published in the New England Journal of Medicine questioned the value of vertebroplasty in treating ver-tebral compression fractures. Nevertheless, the prac-tice of physicians treating these conditions has barely changed. The objective of this review is to try to clarify the most important issues, based on our own experi-ence and the reported evidence about both techniques, and to guide towards the most appropriate choice of treatment of vertebral fractures, although many ques-tions still remain unanswered.展开更多
文摘Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures(OVCFs)are the most common fragility fracture and significantly influence the quality of life in the elderly.Currently,the literature lacks a comprehensive narrative review of the management of OVCFs.The purpose of this study is to review background information,diagnosis,and surgical and non-surgical management of the OVCFs.A comprehensive search of PubMed and Google Scholar for articles in the English language between 1980 and 2021 was performed.Combinations of the following terms were used:compression fractures,vertebral compression fractures,osteoporosis,osteoporotic compression fractures,vertebroplasty,kyphoplasty,bisphosphonates,calcitonin,and osteoporosis treatments.Additional articles were also included by examining the reference list of articles found in the search.OVCFs,especially those that occur over long periods,can be asymptomatic.Symptoms of acute OVCFs include pain localized to the mid-line spine,a loss in height,and decreased mobility.The primary treatment regimens are pain control,medication management,vertebral augmentation,and anterior or posterior decompression and reconstructions.Pain control can be achieved with acetaminophen or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for mild pain or opioids and/or calcitonin for moderate to severe pain.Bisphosphonates and denosumab are the first-line treatments for osteoporosis.Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are reserved for patients who have not found symptomatic relief through conservative methods and are effective in achieving pain relief.Vertebroplasty is less technical and cheaper than kyphoplasty but could have more complications.Calcium and vitamin D supplementation can have a protective and therapeutic effect.Management of OVCFs must be combined with multiple approaches.Appropriate exercises and activity modification are important in fracture prevention.Medication with different mechanisms of action is a critical long-term causal treatment strategy.The minimally invasive surgical interventions such as vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are reserved for patients not responsive to conservative therapy and are recognized as efficient stopgap treatment methods.Posterior decompression and fixation or Anterior decompression and reconstruction may be required if neurological deficits are present.The detailed pathogenesis and related targeted treatment options still need to be developed for better clinical outcomes.
文摘BACKGROUND Osteoporosis with vertebral compression fractures is increasingly common in the elderly population.Cement augmentation is one of the effective surgical treatments for these patients.Currently,there are several different types of cement augmentation treatments.No studies have compared the safety and efficacy of different cement augmentation types for the treatment of such fractures;thus,we retrospectively compared vertebroplasty,balloon kyphoplasty,and kyphoplasty with SpineJack or an intravertebral expandable pillar.AIM To compare the postoperative safety and efficacy of each surgical intervention in treating vertebral compression fractures.METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 354 patients with acute vertebral compression fractures,defined as signal changes in the T1 weighted magnetic resonance imaging,and randomly divided the patients into five groups.Their visual analog scale scores for pain,kyphotic angle,average body height,rate of cement leakage,and occurrence of adjacent vertebral compression fractures were followed for 1 year.One-way analysis of variance,the post hoc Bonferroni test,and Fisher exact probability test were used for statistical analyses.RESULTS All pain scores significantly improved 12 mo postoperatively;however,there was no significant difference between the groups(P=0.325).Kyphoplasty with SpineJack significantly reduced the kyphotic angle(P=0.028)and restored the height of the vertebral body(P=0.02).The rate of adjacent compression fractures was the highest in the vertebroplasty group,with a statistically significant difference according to the Fisher exact probability test(P=0.02).The treatment with the lowest cement leakage rate cannot be identified because of the small sample size;however,kyphoplasty with SpineJack,an IVEP,and vesselplasty resulted in lower rates of cement leakage than balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty.CONCLUSION Kyphoplasty with SpineJack has good outcomes in kyphotic angle reduction and body height restoration.Vertebroplasty has the highest cement leakage rate and adjacent compression fracture occurrence.
文摘Purpose: Osteoporotic vertebral fractures with no sign of vertebral collapse on initial radiographs, which is so-called occult vertebral fractures (VFs), exist. Occult VFs have a high rate of missed diagnosis, and the treatment of these fractures has rarely been discussed in the literature. We evaluated the effects of vertebral bone drilling for the pain due to occults VFs. Materials and Methods: Eighteen patients with painful osteoporotic occult VFs underwent the vertebral bone drilling. We evaluated the clinical outcome by comparing numerical rating scale (NRS) and activity of daily life (ADL) values between before and after the vertebral bone drilling. Comparisons were made by using Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results: The mean baseline NRS and ADL score, and the mean NRS and ALD score after the bone drilling were 8.4 ± 0.8, 2.2 ± 0.6, 2.4 ± 1.0, 4.6 ± 0.5, respectively. Among the patients, we detected significant improvements in NRS pain score and ADL score after the drilling compared with baseline score (p < 0.0002). Conclusion: Vertebral bone drilling at the site of painful vertebral compression fractures alleviated the intractable pain due to osteoporotic occult VFs.
文摘The aim of this review is to compare the effectiveness of percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty to treat pain and improve functional outcome from ver-tebral fractures secondary to osteoporosis and tumor conditions. In 2009, two open randomized controlled trials published in the New England Journal of Medicine questioned the value of vertebroplasty in treating ver-tebral compression fractures. Nevertheless, the prac-tice of physicians treating these conditions has barely changed. The objective of this review is to try to clarify the most important issues, based on our own experi-ence and the reported evidence about both techniques, and to guide towards the most appropriate choice of treatment of vertebral fractures, although many ques-tions still remain unanswered.
