Objective： We aimed to investigate the safety and efficiency of vinorelbine/epirubidn/fluorouracil （NEF） regimen as adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Methods： From 2005 to 2008, 227 female breast cancer pat...Objective： We aimed to investigate the safety and efficiency of vinorelbine/epirubidn/fluorouracil （NEF） regimen as adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Methods： From 2005 to 2008, 227 female breast cancer patients were treated with the NEF regimen： vinorelbine 25 mg/m^2 iv on days 1 and 8; epirubicin 60 mg/m2 iv gtt on day 1; 5-Fu 500 mg/m2 iv gtt on day 1. Chemotherapy was repeated every 21-28 days for a total of 6 cycles. Results： The major side effects were neutrope- nia and gastrointestinal syndrome, with a 5-year survival rate of 85.4%, Conclusion： NEF regimen is safe and guarantees a high survival rate which could be recommended as a adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for breast cancer,展开更多
BACKGROUND As the first-line regimens for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, both docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil(DCF) and epirubicin, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil(ECF) regimens are commonly used in c...BACKGROUND As the first-line regimens for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, both docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil(DCF) and epirubicin, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil(ECF) regimens are commonly used in clinical practice, but there is still controversy about which is better.AIM To compare the efficacy and safety of DCF and ECF regimens by conducting this meta-analysis.METHODS Computer searches in PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE, Science Direct, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library and Scopus were performed to find the clinical studies of all comparisons between DCF and ECF regimens. We used progression-free survival(PFS), overall survival(OS), objective response rate(ORR), disease control rate(DCR), and adverse effects(AEs) as endpoints for analysis.RESULTS Our meta-analysis included seven qualified studies involving a total of 598 patients. The pooled hazard ratios between the DCF and ECF groups were comparable in PFS(95%CI: 0.58-1.46, P = 0.73), OS(95%CI: 0.65-1.10, P = 0.21),and total AEs(95%CI: 0.93-1.29, P = 0.30). The DCF group was significantly better than the ECF group in terms of ORR(95%CI: 1.13-1.75, P = 0.002) and DCR(95%CI: 1.03-1.41, P = 0.02). However, the incidence rate of grade 3-4 AEs was also greater in the DCF group than in the ECF group(95%CI: 1.16-1.88, P = 0.002),especially for neutropenia and febrile neutropenia.CONCLUSION With better ORR and DCR values, the DCF regimen seems to be more suitable for advanced gastric cancer than the ECF regimen. However, the higher rate of AEs in the DCF group still needs to be noticed.展开更多
目的:研究腺病毒介导IL-24基因(Ad.IL-24)与化疗药物联用对肝癌细胞株PLC/PRF/5增殖的抑制作用。方法:用Ad.IL-24分别联合化疗药物氟尿嘧啶(fluorouracil,5-Fu)和表柔比星(epirubicin,EPI)处理培养的肝癌细胞株PLC/PRF/5,MTT法检测细胞...目的:研究腺病毒介导IL-24基因(Ad.IL-24)与化疗药物联用对肝癌细胞株PLC/PRF/5增殖的抑制作用。方法:用Ad.IL-24分别联合化疗药物氟尿嘧啶(fluorouracil,5-Fu)和表柔比星(epirubicin,EPI)处理培养的肝癌细胞株PLC/PRF/5,MTT法检测细胞增殖抑制率,流式细胞术(FCM)检测细胞周期和凋亡率。结果:10 MOI Ad.IL-24与25μg/ml5-Fu联合应用后72h,PLC/PRF/5细胞增殖抑制率达(67.4±0.58)%,显著高于单用Ad.IL-24组的(46.8±0.74)%和5-Fu组的(29.3±0.60)%(均P<0.05);10MOIAd.IL-24与2.5μg/mlEPI联合应用后72h,PLC/PRF/5细胞增殖抑制率达(72.5±0.92)%,显著高于单用Ad.IL-24组的(46.8±0.74)%和EPI组的(32.2±0.69)%(均P<0.05)。流式细胞术检测结果显示,Ad.IL-24与5-Fu或EPI联合应用明显导致细胞在G2/M期阻滞;Ad.IL-24+5-Fu组细胞凋亡率为(52.15±2.32)%,显著高于单用Ad.IL-24组的(28.36±3.49)%和5-Fu组的(8.27±2.61)%(均P<0.05);Ad.IL-24+EPI组细胞凋亡率为(58.67±1.73)%,显著高于单用Ad.IL-24组的(28.36±3.49)%和EPI组的(11.82±1.91)%(均P<0.05)。结论:Ad.IL-24与5-Fu或EPI联用能显著提高对肝癌细胞株PLC/PRF/5增殖的抑制作用。展开更多
文摘Objective： We aimed to investigate the safety and efficiency of vinorelbine/epirubidn/fluorouracil （NEF） regimen as adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Methods： From 2005 to 2008, 227 female breast cancer patients were treated with the NEF regimen： vinorelbine 25 mg/m^2 iv on days 1 and 8; epirubicin 60 mg/m2 iv gtt on day 1; 5-Fu 500 mg/m2 iv gtt on day 1. Chemotherapy was repeated every 21-28 days for a total of 6 cycles. Results： The major side effects were neutrope- nia and gastrointestinal syndrome, with a 5-year survival rate of 85.4%, Conclusion： NEF regimen is safe and guarantees a high survival rate which could be recommended as a adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for breast cancer,
基金Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China,No.81560345
文摘BACKGROUND As the first-line regimens for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, both docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil(DCF) and epirubicin, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil(ECF) regimens are commonly used in clinical practice, but there is still controversy about which is better.AIM To compare the efficacy and safety of DCF and ECF regimens by conducting this meta-analysis.METHODS Computer searches in PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE, Science Direct, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library and Scopus were performed to find the clinical studies of all comparisons between DCF and ECF regimens. We used progression-free survival(PFS), overall survival(OS), objective response rate(ORR), disease control rate(DCR), and adverse effects(AEs) as endpoints for analysis.RESULTS Our meta-analysis included seven qualified studies involving a total of 598 patients. The pooled hazard ratios between the DCF and ECF groups were comparable in PFS(95%CI: 0.58-1.46, P = 0.73), OS(95%CI: 0.65-1.10, P = 0.21),and total AEs(95%CI: 0.93-1.29, P = 0.30). The DCF group was significantly better than the ECF group in terms of ORR(95%CI: 1.13-1.75, P = 0.002) and DCR(95%CI: 1.03-1.41, P = 0.02). However, the incidence rate of grade 3-4 AEs was also greater in the DCF group than in the ECF group(95%CI: 1.16-1.88, P = 0.002),especially for neutropenia and febrile neutropenia.CONCLUSION With better ORR and DCR values, the DCF regimen seems to be more suitable for advanced gastric cancer than the ECF regimen. However, the higher rate of AEs in the DCF group still needs to be noticed.
文摘目的:研究腺病毒介导IL-24基因(Ad.IL-24)与化疗药物联用对肝癌细胞株PLC/PRF/5增殖的抑制作用。方法:用Ad.IL-24分别联合化疗药物氟尿嘧啶(fluorouracil,5-Fu)和表柔比星(epirubicin,EPI)处理培养的肝癌细胞株PLC/PRF/5,MTT法检测细胞增殖抑制率,流式细胞术(FCM)检测细胞周期和凋亡率。结果:10 MOI Ad.IL-24与25μg/ml5-Fu联合应用后72h,PLC/PRF/5细胞增殖抑制率达(67.4±0.58)%,显著高于单用Ad.IL-24组的(46.8±0.74)%和5-Fu组的(29.3±0.60)%(均P<0.05);10MOIAd.IL-24与2.5μg/mlEPI联合应用后72h,PLC/PRF/5细胞增殖抑制率达(72.5±0.92)%,显著高于单用Ad.IL-24组的(46.8±0.74)%和EPI组的(32.2±0.69)%(均P<0.05)。流式细胞术检测结果显示,Ad.IL-24与5-Fu或EPI联合应用明显导致细胞在G2/M期阻滞;Ad.IL-24+5-Fu组细胞凋亡率为(52.15±2.32)%,显著高于单用Ad.IL-24组的(28.36±3.49)%和5-Fu组的(8.27±2.61)%(均P<0.05);Ad.IL-24+EPI组细胞凋亡率为(58.67±1.73)%,显著高于单用Ad.IL-24组的(28.36±3.49)%和EPI组的(11.82±1.91)%(均P<0.05)。结论:Ad.IL-24与5-Fu或EPI联用能显著提高对肝癌细胞株PLC/PRF/5增殖的抑制作用。
