期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Seismic earth pressures on flexible cantilever retaining walls with deformable inclusions 被引量:3
1
作者 Ozgur L.Ertugrul Aurelian C.Trandafir 《Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering》 SCIE CSCD 2014年第5期417-427,共11页
In this study, the results of 1-g shaking table tests performed on small-scale flexible cantilever wallmodels retaining composite backfill made of a deformable geofoam inclusion and granular cohesionlessmaterial were ... In this study, the results of 1-g shaking table tests performed on small-scale flexible cantilever wallmodels retaining composite backfill made of a deformable geofoam inclusion and granular cohesionlessmaterial were presented. Two different polystyrene materials were utilized as deformable inclusions.Lateral dynamic earth pressures and wall displacements at different elevations of the retaining wallmodel were monitored during the tests. The earth pressures and displacements of the retaining wallswith deformable inclusions were compared with those of the models without geofoam inclusions.Comparisons indicated that geofoam panels of low stiffness installed against the retaining wall modelaffect displacement and dynamic lateral pressure profile along the wall height. Depending on the inclusioncharacteristics and the wall flexibility, up to 50% reduction in dynamic earth pressures wasobserved. The efficiency of load and displacement reduction decreased as the flexibility ratio of the wallmodel increased. On the other hand, dynamic load reduction efficiency of the deformable inclusionincreased as the amplitude and frequency ratio of the seismic excitation increased. Relative flexibility ofthe deformable layer (the thickness and the elastic stiffness of the polystyrene material) played animportant role in the amount of load reduction. Dynamic earth pressure coefficients were compared withthose calculated with an analytical approach. Pressure coefficients calculated with this method werefound to be in good agreement with the results of the tests performed on the wall model having lowflexibility ratio. It was observed that deformable inclusions reduce residual wall stresses observed at theend of seismic excitation thus contributing to the post-earthquake stability of the retaining wall. Thegraphs presented within this paper regarding the dynamic earth pressure coefficients versus the wallflexibility and inclusion characteristics may serve for the seismic design of full-scale retaining walls withdeformable polystyrene inclusions. 2014 Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Production and hosting byElsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 展开更多
关键词 Cantilever retaining wall Deformable geofoam panel 1-g shaking table tests dynamic earth pressure Polystyrene Flexibility ratio Analytical approach
下载PDF
CFD modeling of pressure drop and drag coefficient in fixed beds:Wall effects 被引量:7
2
作者 Rupesh K.Reddy Jyeshtharaj B.Joshi 《Particuology》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2010年第1期37-43,共7页
Simulations of fixed beds having column to particle diameter ratio (D/dp) of 3, 5 and 10 were performed in the creeping, transition and turbulent flow regimes, where Reynolds number (dpVLρL/μL) was varied from 0... Simulations of fixed beds having column to particle diameter ratio (D/dp) of 3, 5 and 10 were performed in the creeping, transition and turbulent flow regimes, where Reynolds number (dpVLρL/μL) was varied from 0.1 to 10,000. The deviations from Ergun's equation due to the wall effects, which are important in D/dp 〈 15 beds were well explained by the CFD simulations. Thus, an increase in the pressure drop was observed due to the wall friction in the creeping flow, whereas, in turbulent regime a decrease in the pressure drop was observed due to the channeling near the wall. It was observed that, with an increase in the D/dp ratio, the effect of wall on drag coefficient decreases and drag coefficient nearly approaches to Ergun's equation. The predicted drag coefficient values were in agreement with the experimental results reported in the literature, in creeping flow regime, whereas in turbulent flow the difference was within 10-15%. 展开更多
关键词 Computational fluid dynamics Fixed bed wall effects pressure drop Drag coefficient
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部