“Yang promotes Qi transformation and Yin promotes forming”maintains the normal progress of human life activities,which is an important embodiment of human vitality.The dysfunction of“Yang promotes Qi transformation...“Yang promotes Qi transformation and Yin promotes forming”maintains the normal progress of human life activities,which is an important embodiment of human vitality.The dysfunction of“Yang promotes Qi transformation and Yin promotes forming”leads to the coagulation of pathological products such as phlegm and blood stasis in the breast meridian,resulting in the occurrence of acne mastitis.In clinical treatment,we should take“warm Yang to promote Qi transformation”as the treatment principle,and add or subtract according to the specific situation.展开更多
目的比较加入益气温阳、活血利水法的中医治疗与常规西药治疗慢性心力衰竭的临床疗效,为临床决策提供依据。方法采用Cochrane系统评价方法,计算机检索Medline、中国知网、万方数据库、维普期刊库、中国生物医学文献数据库中加入益气温...目的比较加入益气温阳、活血利水法的中医治疗与常规西药治疗慢性心力衰竭的临床疗效,为临床决策提供依据。方法采用Cochrane系统评价方法,计算机检索Medline、中国知网、万方数据库、维普期刊库、中国生物医学文献数据库中加入益气温阳、活血利水法的中医治疗慢性心力衰竭的随机对照试验(RCT)或半随机对照试验,采用Jadad评分量表评价纳入文献的质量,采用Rev Man 5.2软件进行Meta分析。比较加入益气温阳、活血利水法的中医治疗组(治疗组)与常规西药治疗组(对照组)的显效率、有效率、无效率及治疗前、后左室射血分数(LVEF)的水平。结果共6篇文献符合纳入标准,包括751例患者,其中治疗组376例、对照组375例。Meta分析结果显示,治疗组与对照组显效率和无效率间差异有统计学意义〔OR=2.03,95%CI(1.50,2.73),P<0.01;OR=0.26,95%CI(0.16,0.40),P<0.01〕,治疗组与对照组有效率间差异无统计学意义〔OR=1.05,95%CI(0.78,1.41),P=0.74〕。治疗组与对照组充血性心力衰竭患者治疗前LVEF间差异无统计学意义〔WMD=-0.17,95%CI(-1.10,0.77),P=0.72〕,治疗后差异有统计学意义〔WMD=10.87,95%CI(9.44,12.30),P<0.01〕。结论根据目前的文献结果,加入益气温阳、活血利水法的中医治疗心力衰竭是有效的,能提高显效率和LVEF,降低无效率,值得临床推广,但仍需多中心、大样本量、随访时间长的RCT以佐证。展开更多
文摘“Yang promotes Qi transformation and Yin promotes forming”maintains the normal progress of human life activities,which is an important embodiment of human vitality.The dysfunction of“Yang promotes Qi transformation and Yin promotes forming”leads to the coagulation of pathological products such as phlegm and blood stasis in the breast meridian,resulting in the occurrence of acne mastitis.In clinical treatment,we should take“warm Yang to promote Qi transformation”as the treatment principle,and add or subtract according to the specific situation.
文摘目的比较加入益气温阳、活血利水法的中医治疗与常规西药治疗慢性心力衰竭的临床疗效,为临床决策提供依据。方法采用Cochrane系统评价方法,计算机检索Medline、中国知网、万方数据库、维普期刊库、中国生物医学文献数据库中加入益气温阳、活血利水法的中医治疗慢性心力衰竭的随机对照试验(RCT)或半随机对照试验,采用Jadad评分量表评价纳入文献的质量,采用Rev Man 5.2软件进行Meta分析。比较加入益气温阳、活血利水法的中医治疗组(治疗组)与常规西药治疗组(对照组)的显效率、有效率、无效率及治疗前、后左室射血分数(LVEF)的水平。结果共6篇文献符合纳入标准,包括751例患者,其中治疗组376例、对照组375例。Meta分析结果显示,治疗组与对照组显效率和无效率间差异有统计学意义〔OR=2.03,95%CI(1.50,2.73),P<0.01;OR=0.26,95%CI(0.16,0.40),P<0.01〕,治疗组与对照组有效率间差异无统计学意义〔OR=1.05,95%CI(0.78,1.41),P=0.74〕。治疗组与对照组充血性心力衰竭患者治疗前LVEF间差异无统计学意义〔WMD=-0.17,95%CI(-1.10,0.77),P=0.72〕,治疗后差异有统计学意义〔WMD=10.87,95%CI(9.44,12.30),P<0.01〕。结论根据目前的文献结果,加入益气温阳、活血利水法的中医治疗心力衰竭是有效的,能提高显效率和LVEF,降低无效率,值得临床推广,但仍需多中心、大样本量、随访时间长的RCT以佐证。