贵刊1991年第1期刊载了《be all wet 不是‘全身湿透了’》一文。作者认为应将 when he(the crocodile)came up again,themonkey was all wet(初中英语第四册第三课)改为 the monkeywas wet through。其理由是:be all wet是美语,意思是...贵刊1991年第1期刊载了《be all wet 不是‘全身湿透了’》一文。作者认为应将 when he(the crocodile)came up again,themonkey was all wet(初中英语第四册第三课)改为 the monkeywas wet through。其理由是:be all wet是美语,意思是“完全错了,”而不是“全身湿透了。”“全身湿透了”应该用 be wetthrough。笔者认为,这种提法值得商榷。因为:就现行中学课本中,用be all wet表示“全湿”的现象并非没有。例如:His shoes展开更多
Effects of the processing methods on the mechanical properties of treated bagasse fibre reinforced epoxy composite were evaluated. The composite materials were processed by employing hand lay-up and compression mouldi...Effects of the processing methods on the mechanical properties of treated bagasse fibre reinforced epoxy composite were evaluated. The composite materials were processed by employing hand lay-up and compression moulding methods and fibres were treated with NaOH solution. The composite samples were subjected to tensile, flexural and impact tests. Based on the findings, compression moulding method produced better mechanical properties compared to the composites manufactured by hand lay-up method. The results showed that the tensile strength and Young’s modulus of the samples produced by compression moulding method increased by 77 percent and 47 percent respectively (at optimal fibre loading) compared to those produced by the hand lay-up method. The results also showed noticeable improvements in the impact strength of the material produced by compression moulding method, with impact strength of 11.5 kJ/m2 against the samples produced by hand lay-up method, with impact strength of 7 kJ/m2.展开更多
文摘贵刊1991年第1期刊载了《be all wet 不是‘全身湿透了’》一文。作者认为应将 when he(the crocodile)came up again,themonkey was all wet(初中英语第四册第三课)改为 the monkeywas wet through。其理由是:be all wet是美语,意思是“完全错了,”而不是“全身湿透了。”“全身湿透了”应该用 be wetthrough。笔者认为,这种提法值得商榷。因为:就现行中学课本中,用be all wet表示“全湿”的现象并非没有。例如:His shoes
文摘Effects of the processing methods on the mechanical properties of treated bagasse fibre reinforced epoxy composite were evaluated. The composite materials were processed by employing hand lay-up and compression moulding methods and fibres were treated with NaOH solution. The composite samples were subjected to tensile, flexural and impact tests. Based on the findings, compression moulding method produced better mechanical properties compared to the composites manufactured by hand lay-up method. The results showed that the tensile strength and Young’s modulus of the samples produced by compression moulding method increased by 77 percent and 47 percent respectively (at optimal fibre loading) compared to those produced by the hand lay-up method. The results also showed noticeable improvements in the impact strength of the material produced by compression moulding method, with impact strength of 11.5 kJ/m2 against the samples produced by hand lay-up method, with impact strength of 7 kJ/m2.
