In order to reasonably explain the phenomenon of cell bioelectricity,we proposed the conservation law of cell membrane area,established the ion inequality equation,and therefore paid attention to the mystery of“θ-τ...In order to reasonably explain the phenomenon of cell bioelectricity,we proposed the conservation law of cell membrane area,established the ion inequality equation,and therefore paid attention to the mystery of“θ-τ”.We researched and analyzed the“θ-τ”mystery,discussed the parity non-conservation in weak interactions,suggested possible experiments to test the parity non-conservation in weak interactions,and gave our research and analysis conclusions:The parity non-conservation in weak interactions,is still a“conjecture”;The experimental scheme suggested in the papers by C.N.Yang et al.cannot determine whether the weak interaction can separate left and right,and it is impossible to directly answer whetherθandτin the“θ-τ”mystery are the same particle;The Co60βdecay experiment such as C.S.Wu is a pseudo-mirror experiment,whether the experimental result violates parity conservation is only based on the assumption of C.N.Yang et al.In fact,experiments such as polarized Co60 did not overturn the so-called“law of parity conservation”.The mirror image principle does not have any physical meaning,does not correspond to any physical conservation quantity,and cannot be destroyed by any physical experiment.In the process of turning“mirror symmetry”and“mirror asymmetry”into so-called physical“common sense”and scientific“facts”respectively,the methods of transformation are“stealing concepts”and“circular argumentation”.The“θ-τ”mystery is a“man-made”mystery.θandτare two different particles,which may be the result of the same precursor particle being divided into two.The work of C.N.Yang,T.D.Lee,C.S.Wu et al.has brought quantum physicists from the“small black room”to the“bigger black room”or“smaller black room”.The right and wise choice is to go back through the door that came in.With the development of science today,it is time for some contents to reform from the bottom.展开更多
目的:探讨营养包(Ying Yang Bao,YYB)服用时长和频率与6~24月龄婴幼儿血红蛋白(Hemoglobin,Hb)水平和贫血率之间的阈值效应关系。方法:研究数据来自于早期儿童营养包干预长期营养健康作用评估项目。采用t检验和卡方检验比较连续变量和...目的:探讨营养包(Ying Yang Bao,YYB)服用时长和频率与6~24月龄婴幼儿血红蛋白(Hemoglobin,Hb)水平和贫血率之间的阈值效应关系。方法:研究数据来自于早期儿童营养包干预长期营养健康作用评估项目。采用t检验和卡方检验比较连续变量和分类变量的组间差异。采用限制性立方样条回归检验YYB服用时长和频率与儿童血红蛋白(Hb)水平和贫血率之间的非线性趋势,探索可能存在的阈值效应关系。结果:YYB服用时长与Hb水平和贫血率的非线性趋势检验P值分别为0.665和0.211,服用频率与Hb水平和贫血率的非线性趋势检验P值分别为0.110和0.157。YYB服用时长达到8.68个月时,Hb水平变化的斜率β=0,贫血发生风险的OR=1;YYB服用频率达5.6袋/周时,Hb水平变化的斜率β=0,服用频率达4.6袋/周时,贫血发生风险的OR=1。结论:YYB服用时长和频率与6~24月龄婴幼儿Hb水平和贫血率之间存在线性关联;改善Hb水平和贫血率的最低有效时长约为8.6个月,最低有效频率约为5~6袋/周。展开更多
文摘In order to reasonably explain the phenomenon of cell bioelectricity,we proposed the conservation law of cell membrane area,established the ion inequality equation,and therefore paid attention to the mystery of“θ-τ”.We researched and analyzed the“θ-τ”mystery,discussed the parity non-conservation in weak interactions,suggested possible experiments to test the parity non-conservation in weak interactions,and gave our research and analysis conclusions:The parity non-conservation in weak interactions,is still a“conjecture”;The experimental scheme suggested in the papers by C.N.Yang et al.cannot determine whether the weak interaction can separate left and right,and it is impossible to directly answer whetherθandτin the“θ-τ”mystery are the same particle;The Co60βdecay experiment such as C.S.Wu is a pseudo-mirror experiment,whether the experimental result violates parity conservation is only based on the assumption of C.N.Yang et al.In fact,experiments such as polarized Co60 did not overturn the so-called“law of parity conservation”.The mirror image principle does not have any physical meaning,does not correspond to any physical conservation quantity,and cannot be destroyed by any physical experiment.In the process of turning“mirror symmetry”and“mirror asymmetry”into so-called physical“common sense”and scientific“facts”respectively,the methods of transformation are“stealing concepts”and“circular argumentation”.The“θ-τ”mystery is a“man-made”mystery.θandτare two different particles,which may be the result of the same precursor particle being divided into two.The work of C.N.Yang,T.D.Lee,C.S.Wu et al.has brought quantum physicists from the“small black room”to the“bigger black room”or“smaller black room”.The right and wise choice is to go back through the door that came in.With the development of science today,it is time for some contents to reform from the bottom.
文摘目的:探讨营养包(Ying Yang Bao,YYB)服用时长和频率与6~24月龄婴幼儿血红蛋白(Hemoglobin,Hb)水平和贫血率之间的阈值效应关系。方法:研究数据来自于早期儿童营养包干预长期营养健康作用评估项目。采用t检验和卡方检验比较连续变量和分类变量的组间差异。采用限制性立方样条回归检验YYB服用时长和频率与儿童血红蛋白(Hb)水平和贫血率之间的非线性趋势,探索可能存在的阈值效应关系。结果:YYB服用时长与Hb水平和贫血率的非线性趋势检验P值分别为0.665和0.211,服用频率与Hb水平和贫血率的非线性趋势检验P值分别为0.110和0.157。YYB服用时长达到8.68个月时,Hb水平变化的斜率β=0,贫血发生风险的OR=1;YYB服用频率达5.6袋/周时,Hb水平变化的斜率β=0,服用频率达4.6袋/周时,贫血发生风险的OR=1。结论:YYB服用时长和频率与6~24月龄婴幼儿Hb水平和贫血率之间存在线性关联;改善Hb水平和贫血率的最低有效时长约为8.6个月,最低有效频率约为5~6袋/周。