Assessment of the three representative empirical models for zenith tropospheric delay(ZTD)using the CMONOC data

The precise correction of atmospheric zenith tropospheric delay(ZTD)is significant for the Global Navigation Satellite System(GNSS)performance regarding positioning accuracy and convergence time.In the past decades,many empirical ZTD models based on whether the gridded or scattered ZTD products have been proposed and widely used in the GNSS positioning applications.But there is no comprehensive evaluation of these models for the whole China region,which features complicated topography and climate.In this study,we completely assess the typical empirical models,the IGGtropSH model(gridded,non-meteorology),the SHAtropE model(scattered,non-meteorology),and the GPT3 model(gridded,meteorology)using the Crustal Movement Observation Network of China(CMONOC)network.In general,the results show that the three models share consistent performance with RMSE/bias of 37.45/1.63,37.13/2.20,and 38.27/1.34 mm for the GPT3,SHAtropE and IGGtropSH model,respectively.However,the models had a distinct performance regarding geographical distribution,elevation,seasonal variations,and daily variation.In the southeastern region of China,RMSE values are around 50 mm,which are much higher than that in the western region,approximately 20 mm.The SHAtropE model exhibits better performance for areas with large variations in elevation.The GPT3 model and the IGGtropSH model are more stable across different months,and the SHAtropE model based on the GNSS data exhibits superior performance across various UTC epochs.

Assessment of GNSS zenith tropospheric delay responses to atmospheric variables derived from ERA5 data over Nigeria

Tropospheric delay is a major error caused by atmospheric refraction in Global Navigation Satellite System(GNSS)positioning.The study evaluates the potential of the European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecast(ECMWF)Reanalysis 5(ERA5)atmospheric variables in estimating the Zenith Tropospheric Delay(ZTD).Linear regression models(LRM)are applied to estimate ZTD with the ERA5 atmospheric variables.The ZTD are also estimated using standard ZTD models based on ERA5 and Global Pressure and Temperature 3(GPT3)atmospheric variables.These ZTD estimates are evaluated using the data collected from the permanent GNSS continuously operating reference stations in the Nigerian region.The results reveal that the Zenith Hydrostatic Delay(ZHD)from the LRM and the Saastamoinien model using ERA5 surface pressure are of identical accuracy,having a Root Mean Square(RMS)error of 2.3 mm while the GPT3-ZHD has an RMS of 3.4 mm.For the Zenith Wet Delay(ZWD)component,the best estimates are derived using ERA5 Precipitable Water Vapour(PWV).These include the ZWD derived by the LRM having an average RMS of 20.9 mm and Bevis equation having RMS of 21.1 mm and 21.0 mm for global and local weighted mean temperatures,respectively.The evaluation of GPT3-ZWD estimates gives RMS of 45.8 mm.This study has provided a valuable insight into the application of ERA5 data for ZTD estimation.In line with the fndings of the study,the ERA5 atmospheric variables are recommended for improving the accuracy in ZTD estimation,required for GNSS positioning.

精密单点定位中4种函数模型解算性能分析

文章针对PPP中4种不同的函数模型，分析了相应模型的特性，并采用IGS连续运行参考站179个测站数据对这4种模型进行解算，从定位精度、收敛速度、ZTD估计精度、解算时间等方面进行统计分析。实验结果表明，UofC、无电离层组合模型、非组合模型及无模糊度模型在30 min内达到厘米级的站点比例分别为75％、48.9％、51.7％、20.7％，平均收敛时间分别为22.6、36.1、40.9、126.3 min。在参数估计精度方面，无模糊度模型精度较低，其他3种模型单天解在N、E方向误差均值在1～9 mm左右，在U方向误差均值约为2 cm ，ZTD误差均值为10 mm左右，整体上参数估计精度具有一致性。

对流层延迟改正方案对GPS/BDS动态PPP定位精度的影响

针对全球卫星导航系统(GNSS)高精度导航定位易受到对流层延迟误差影响的问题,提出采用全球定位系统(GPS)和北斗卫星导航系统(BDS)组合定位的方法进行动态精密单点定位(PPP):以GPS定位结果为参照,对GPS/BDS组合定位结果进行评估;然后对比分析传统方法(无改正方案)、Saastamoinen模型和天顶对流层延迟(ZTD)参数估计法得到的GPS/BDS组合PPP结果差异。实验结果表明:GPS/BDS组合定位相对于GPS有利于提升定位解算精度,并且可以有效地缩短收敛时间;3种对流层延迟改正方案对PPP定位精度的影响有所不同,水平方向定位精度差异较小,高程方向定位精度有着显著差异;Saastamoinen模型和ZTD参数估计法收敛时间基本保持一致,平均收敛时间大约为60 min,而传统方法平均收敛时间为90 min;此外,采用Saastamoinen模型得到的定位精度表现最佳,可以为GPS/BDS组合动态PPP定位提供1.20 cm以内的水平精度和3.00 cm以内的高程精度。

GSTAR:an innovative software platform for processing space geodetic data at the observation level

To meet the demands for the data combination with multiple space geodetic techniques at the observation level,we developed a new software platform with high extensibility and computation efficiency,named space Geodetic SpatioTemporal data Analysis and Research software(GSTAR).Most of the modules in the GSTAR are coded in C++with object-oriented programming.The layered modular theory is adopted for the design of the software,and the antenna-based data architecture is proposed for users to construct personalized geodetic application scenarios easily.The initial performance of the GSTAR software is evaluated by processing the Global Navigation Satellite System(GNSS)data collected from 315 globally distributed stations over two and a half years.The accuracy of GNSS-based geodetic products is evaluated by comparing them with those released by International GNSS Service(IGS)Analysis Centers(AC).Taking the products released by European Space Agency(ESA)as reference,the Three-Dimension(3D)Root-Mean-Squares(RMS)of the orbit differences are 2.7/6.7/3.3/7.7/21.0 cm and the STandard Deviations(STD)of the clock differences are 19/48/16/32/25 ps for Global Positioning System(GPS),GLObal NAvigation Satellite System(GLONASS),Galileo navigation satellite system(Galileo),BeiDou Navigation Satellite System(BDS),Medium Earth Orbit(MEO),and BDS Inclined Geo-Synchronous Orbit(IGSO)satellites,respectively.The mean values of the X and Y components of the polar coordinate and the Length of Day(LOD)with respect to the International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service(IERS)14 C04 products are-17.6 microarc-second(μas),9.2μas,and 14.0μs/d.Compared to the IGS daily solution,the RMSs of the site position differences in the north/east/up direction are 1.6/1.5/3.9,3.8/2.4/7.6,2.5/2.4/7.9 and 2.7/2.3/7.4 mm for GPS-only,GLONASS-only,Galileo-only,and BDS-only solution,respectively.The RMSs of the differences of the tropospheric Zenith Path Delay(ZPD),the north gradients,and the east gradients are 5.8,0.9,and 0.9 mm with respect to the IGS products.The X and Y components of the geocenter motion estimated from GPS-only,Galileo-only,and BDS-only observations well agree with IGS products,while the Z component values are much nosier where anomalous harmonics in GNSS draconitic year can be found.The accuracies of the above products calculated by the GSTAR are comparable with those from different IGS ACs.Compared to the precise scientific orbit products,the 3D RMS of the orbit differences for the two Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment Follow-on(GRACE-FO)satellites is below 1.5 cm by conducting Precise Point Positioning with Ambiguity Resolution(PPP-AR).In addition,a series of rapid data processing algorithms are developed,and the operation speed of the GSTAR software is 5.6 times faster than that of the Positioning and Navigation Data Analyst(PANDA)software for the quad-system precise orbit determination procedure.

精密单点定位中卫星星历对天顶对流层延迟估计的影响

为了分析不同卫星星历对天顶对流层延迟估计的影响,本文选取不同的卫星星历产品分别进行静态精密单点定位试验,估计天顶对流层延迟,并与IGS发布的天顶对流层延迟产品相比。结果表明,采用最终星历、快速星历和超快星历实测部分时,天顶对流层延迟的平均RMS值分别为4.5mm、4.3mm和4.6mm,估计精度一致。而采用超快星历外推部分时,平均RMS值为6.3mm,估计精度略低。