In the last two decades, “invasiveness” has been the focus of surgical practice gaining momentum because of better outcome in terms of post-operative pain, fewer complications and earlier return to functional activi...In the last two decades, “invasiveness” has been the focus of surgical practice gaining momentum because of better outcome in terms of post-operative pain, fewer complications and earlier return to functional activity. This change was initiated with the advent of laparoscopic surgery. Because of the rapid acceptance and success of operations such as laparoscopic cholecystectomy over the last two decades, a revolution has taken place in general surgery. Since then, a variety of surgical operations in the entire surgical specialty have used endo/laparoscopic techniques.展开更多
目的:观察绝经后女性腰椎和髋部骨密度与腰椎间盘退变的关系。方法:回顾性统计2017年12月~2018年12月因腰痛在我院脊柱外科门诊及住院的229例绝经后女性患者,记录患者年龄、身高、体重、糖尿病史、高血压病史、饮酒史、吸烟史等,采用双...目的:观察绝经后女性腰椎和髋部骨密度与腰椎间盘退变的关系。方法:回顾性统计2017年12月~2018年12月因腰痛在我院脊柱外科门诊及住院的229例绝经后女性患者,记录患者年龄、身高、体重、糖尿病史、高血压病史、饮酒史、吸烟史等,采用双能X线骨密度测量仪检查患者腰椎椎体(L1~L4)骨密度和髋部平均骨密度,记录相应的T值,每例患者同时行腰椎MRI检查。根据骨密度T值≥-1.0为正常,-2.5<T值<-1.0为骨量减少,T值≤-2.5诊断为骨质疏松,将患者分为骨质疏松组(n=78)、骨量减少组(n=73)和正常组(n=78)。每个节段腰椎间盘退变程度用Pfirrmann分级系统进行评分,用协方差和Spearman相关性分析来分析腰椎和髋部骨密度与腰椎间盘退变的关系。结果:骨质疏松组、骨量减少组和骨量正常组的年龄分别为67.17±9.99岁、65.66±10.71岁、55.29±12.35岁,骨质疏松组、骨量减少组年龄显著大于骨量正常组(P<0.05);骨质疏松组的体重指数小于正常组(23.38±2.37kg/m^2 vs 24.72±2.96kg/m^2,P<0.05);其余一般资料各组间无显著性差异(P>0.05)。上腰椎(L1、L2)中,骨质疏松组腰椎间盘退变评分均较正常组低(2.24±0.82 vs 2.60±0.95,2.79±0.95 vs 3.18±0.94,P<0.05),而与骨量减少组比较无显著性差异(P>0.05);下腰椎(L3、L4)椎体和髋部不同骨密度组之间椎间盘退变程度无显著性差异(P>0.05)。各腰椎椎体骨密度分别与腰椎间盘平均退变程度呈正性相关(L1:r=0.185;L2:r=0.157;L3:r=0.180;L4:r=0.132;L1~L4:r=0.180;均P<0.05),髋部骨密度与腰椎间盘退变的严重程度无统计学相关性。结论:绝经后女性腰椎间盘退变的严重程度与腰椎骨密度存在正相关关系,提示绝经后女性腰椎骨密度较高者椎间盘退变可能更严重,有必要进一步做腰椎CT或者MRI检查;股骨颈骨密度检查对骨质疏松诊断更有帮助。展开更多
文摘In the last two decades, “invasiveness” has been the focus of surgical practice gaining momentum because of better outcome in terms of post-operative pain, fewer complications and earlier return to functional activity. This change was initiated with the advent of laparoscopic surgery. Because of the rapid acceptance and success of operations such as laparoscopic cholecystectomy over the last two decades, a revolution has taken place in general surgery. Since then, a variety of surgical operations in the entire surgical specialty have used endo/laparoscopic techniques.
文摘目的:观察绝经后女性腰椎和髋部骨密度与腰椎间盘退变的关系。方法:回顾性统计2017年12月~2018年12月因腰痛在我院脊柱外科门诊及住院的229例绝经后女性患者,记录患者年龄、身高、体重、糖尿病史、高血压病史、饮酒史、吸烟史等,采用双能X线骨密度测量仪检查患者腰椎椎体(L1~L4)骨密度和髋部平均骨密度,记录相应的T值,每例患者同时行腰椎MRI检查。根据骨密度T值≥-1.0为正常,-2.5<T值<-1.0为骨量减少,T值≤-2.5诊断为骨质疏松,将患者分为骨质疏松组(n=78)、骨量减少组(n=73)和正常组(n=78)。每个节段腰椎间盘退变程度用Pfirrmann分级系统进行评分,用协方差和Spearman相关性分析来分析腰椎和髋部骨密度与腰椎间盘退变的关系。结果:骨质疏松组、骨量减少组和骨量正常组的年龄分别为67.17±9.99岁、65.66±10.71岁、55.29±12.35岁,骨质疏松组、骨量减少组年龄显著大于骨量正常组(P<0.05);骨质疏松组的体重指数小于正常组(23.38±2.37kg/m^2 vs 24.72±2.96kg/m^2,P<0.05);其余一般资料各组间无显著性差异(P>0.05)。上腰椎(L1、L2)中,骨质疏松组腰椎间盘退变评分均较正常组低(2.24±0.82 vs 2.60±0.95,2.79±0.95 vs 3.18±0.94,P<0.05),而与骨量减少组比较无显著性差异(P>0.05);下腰椎(L3、L4)椎体和髋部不同骨密度组之间椎间盘退变程度无显著性差异(P>0.05)。各腰椎椎体骨密度分别与腰椎间盘平均退变程度呈正性相关(L1:r=0.185;L2:r=0.157;L3:r=0.180;L4:r=0.132;L1~L4:r=0.180;均P<0.05),髋部骨密度与腰椎间盘退变的严重程度无统计学相关性。结论:绝经后女性腰椎间盘退变的严重程度与腰椎骨密度存在正相关关系,提示绝经后女性腰椎骨密度较高者椎间盘退变可能更严重,有必要进一步做腰椎CT或者MRI检查;股骨颈骨密度检查对骨质疏松诊断更有帮助。
