本文以大学生志愿者在基层社区中的实践行动为经验研究对象,讨论以差序格局为主要特征的基层社会结构与青年大学生行动策略之间的双重互构关系。通过对15名基层社区大学生志愿者的深度访谈,发现大学生的志愿行动受到以差序格局为核心的...本文以大学生志愿者在基层社区中的实践行动为经验研究对象,讨论以差序格局为主要特征的基层社会结构与青年大学生行动策略之间的双重互构关系。通过对15名基层社区大学生志愿者的深度访谈,发现大学生的志愿行动受到以差序格局为核心的基层社会结构的限制,表现为“晚辈”的角色困境、“外来者”的嵌入困境等难题;但大学生的“小小年纪”又可成为借助差序格局解决以上难题的“加分项”,表现为拟亲属关系的构建,以及先“情”后“理”,“情”“理”并施。This paper takes the practical actions of college student volunteers in grassroots communities as the empirical research object, discussing the dual mutual construction between the hierarchical social structure with the main feature of the differential mode of association and the youth volunteer actions of college students. Through in-depth interviews with 15 college student volunteers in grassroots communities, it was found that college students’ volunteer actions are limited by the hierarchical social structure with the differential mode of association as the core, manifesting in dilemmas such as the role of the “younger generation” and the embedding dilemma of “outsiders”. However, college students’ “young age” can also become a “bonus item” for solving these dilemmas by leveraging the differential mode of association, manifesting in the construction of hypothetical kinship relationships, as well as prioritizing emotions over reason and combining emotions and reason.展开更多
文摘本文以大学生志愿者在基层社区中的实践行动为经验研究对象,讨论以差序格局为主要特征的基层社会结构与青年大学生行动策略之间的双重互构关系。通过对15名基层社区大学生志愿者的深度访谈,发现大学生的志愿行动受到以差序格局为核心的基层社会结构的限制,表现为“晚辈”的角色困境、“外来者”的嵌入困境等难题;但大学生的“小小年纪”又可成为借助差序格局解决以上难题的“加分项”,表现为拟亲属关系的构建,以及先“情”后“理”,“情”“理”并施。This paper takes the practical actions of college student volunteers in grassroots communities as the empirical research object, discussing the dual mutual construction between the hierarchical social structure with the main feature of the differential mode of association and the youth volunteer actions of college students. Through in-depth interviews with 15 college student volunteers in grassroots communities, it was found that college students’ volunteer actions are limited by the hierarchical social structure with the differential mode of association as the core, manifesting in dilemmas such as the role of the “younger generation” and the embedding dilemma of “outsiders”. However, college students’ “young age” can also become a “bonus item” for solving these dilemmas by leveraging the differential mode of association, manifesting in the construction of hypothetical kinship relationships, as well as prioritizing emotions over reason and combining emotions and reason.
