詹姆斯．w．弗雷泽（JamesW．Fraser）．纽约大学斯坦哈特文化、教育与人类发展学院教育史专业教授，纽约大学通识教育系主任，纽约大学伦敦、英格兰及加纳阿克拉分校管理委员会委员．美国伍德罗．威尔逊全国联谊基金会（Woodrow Wilson...詹姆斯．w．弗雷泽（JamesW．Fraser）．纽约大学斯坦哈特文化、教育与人类发展学院教育史专业教授，纽约大学通识教育系主任，纽约大学伦敦、英格兰及加纳阿克拉分校管理委员会委员．美国伍德罗．威尔逊全国联谊基金会（Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation）高级顾问，主要研究方向为教育与文化、历史教学等。1999年，他组建了美国东北大学教育学院，并担任院长。2008—2012年．他担任美国伍德．威尔逊全国联谊基金会高级副主席。他曾担任美国《教育史季刊》（History of Education Quarte晰）编委，2013-2014年担任美国教育史学会（History of Education Society）主席。2014年11月6—9日．美国第54届教育史年会在印第安纳州印第安纳波利斯举办。此次会议对教育史研究视角转换（女性视角、身体视角）、史料挖掘、教育史对大学发展的作用、教育史学科教学等问题展开探讨。本刊特邀华中师范大学教育学院博士研究生周娜对美国教育史学会新任主席詹姆斯．w．弗雷泽的主题发言进行翻译．以飨读者。展开更多
The field of education is increasingly catching people’s eyes as more and more people become aware of its influence and significance on the young generation.Nevertheless,when it comes to the teaching and learning pro...The field of education is increasingly catching people’s eyes as more and more people become aware of its influence and significance on the young generation.Nevertheless,when it comes to the teaching and learning process,the role of nonverbal behavior is often neglected.Indeed,nonverbal behavior constitutes more than 90%of our daily communication,and it is also one vi⁃tal aspect in a classroom setting,which has the power of maintaining classroom order and the teacher-student relationships.Eye contact,one crucial part of nonverbal behavior,is a topic worth researching.The research focuses on the controversial topic that is based on a contrastive analysis of how eye contact functions differently in the western and non-western cultures.Theories of both western and non-western scholars are presented to rationalize why the use of direct and constant eye contact in a classroom context differs in the two cultures.More theories and practices are also cited to explain an apparent inconsistency,which is“teachers in both western and non-western cultures are encouraged to use direct and constant eye contacts in classes,while people in Asian countries tend to avoid direct eye contact”.展开更多
文摘我将从回顾教育史的黄金时代开启对教育史危机的探讨。在教育史学科的繁荣期,每一位教师都会选择一门或几门教育史课程进行学习,但必须指出的是,风行于20世纪前半叶教师教育体系中的教育史课程,无论是课程的讲授,还是教材的编写,都称不上理想。彼时,教育史课程的讲授是由一些没有历史感,或对教育史学科价值缺乏认识的、所谓＂多面手＂教师来承担。所使用的教材也大都如埃尔伍德·P·克伯莱（Ellwood P.
文摘詹姆斯．w．弗雷泽（JamesW．Fraser）．纽约大学斯坦哈特文化、教育与人类发展学院教育史专业教授，纽约大学通识教育系主任，纽约大学伦敦、英格兰及加纳阿克拉分校管理委员会委员．美国伍德罗．威尔逊全国联谊基金会（Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation）高级顾问，主要研究方向为教育与文化、历史教学等。1999年，他组建了美国东北大学教育学院，并担任院长。2008—2012年．他担任美国伍德．威尔逊全国联谊基金会高级副主席。他曾担任美国《教育史季刊》（History of Education Quarte晰）编委，2013-2014年担任美国教育史学会（History of Education Society）主席。2014年11月6—9日．美国第54届教育史年会在印第安纳州印第安纳波利斯举办。此次会议对教育史研究视角转换（女性视角、身体视角）、史料挖掘、教育史对大学发展的作用、教育史学科教学等问题展开探讨。本刊特邀华中师范大学教育学院博士研究生周娜对美国教育史学会新任主席詹姆斯．w．弗雷泽的主题发言进行翻译．以飨读者。
文摘The field of education is increasingly catching people’s eyes as more and more people become aware of its influence and significance on the young generation.Nevertheless,when it comes to the teaching and learning process,the role of nonverbal behavior is often neglected.Indeed,nonverbal behavior constitutes more than 90%of our daily communication,and it is also one vi⁃tal aspect in a classroom setting,which has the power of maintaining classroom order and the teacher-student relationships.Eye contact,one crucial part of nonverbal behavior,is a topic worth researching.The research focuses on the controversial topic that is based on a contrastive analysis of how eye contact functions differently in the western and non-western cultures.Theories of both western and non-western scholars are presented to rationalize why the use of direct and constant eye contact in a classroom context differs in the two cultures.More theories and practices are also cited to explain an apparent inconsistency,which is“teachers in both western and non-western cultures are encouraged to use direct and constant eye contacts in classes,while people in Asian countries tend to avoid direct eye contact”.
