1985年丹·加伯（Dan Garber）的“莱布尼茨与物理学的基础”一文公开发表，“另一个莱布尼茨”成为学界关注的新焦点。学者们对莱布尼茨的生物、有机形体和机器概念产生了浓厚的兴趣。随着研究的深入，莱布尼茨获得了一个崭新的身...1985年丹·加伯（Dan Garber）的“莱布尼茨与物理学的基础”一文公开发表，“另一个莱布尼茨”成为学界关注的新焦点。学者们对莱布尼茨的生物、有机形体和机器概念产生了浓厚的兴趣。随着研究的深入，莱布尼茨获得了一个崭新的身份——生命科学研究者。在《新系统》（New System of Nature，1695）一书中，莱布尼茨首次提到自然机器的概念，以及自然机器和人造机器的区别。展开更多
The purpose of this paper is to synthesize a conception of inquiry from the insights of Paul Feyerabend and C.S.Peirce.Here,I contend that Peirce's account of inquiry is overly narrow.More poignantly,I show how Pe...The purpose of this paper is to synthesize a conception of inquiry from the insights of Paul Feyerabend and C.S.Peirce.Here,I contend that Peirce's account of inquiry is overly narrow.More poignantly,I show how Peirce's motto that one should not block the road of inquiry is in conflict with his rejection of skepticism.This is shown using Feyerabend's arguments for pluralism.Nevertheless,I sketch an alternative position that borrows insights from both Peirce and Feyerabend.This position,I contend,retains the crucial elements of each position that drove them while critically developing them in a coherent fashion.This synthesized position offers the beginning of a novel approach to modelling divisions of epistemic labor.展开更多
文摘1985年丹·加伯（Dan Garber）的“莱布尼茨与物理学的基础”一文公开发表，“另一个莱布尼茨”成为学界关注的新焦点。学者们对莱布尼茨的生物、有机形体和机器概念产生了浓厚的兴趣。随着研究的深入，莱布尼茨获得了一个崭新的身份——生命科学研究者。在《新系统》（New System of Nature，1695）一书中，莱布尼茨首次提到自然机器的概念，以及自然机器和人造机器的区别。
文摘The purpose of this paper is to synthesize a conception of inquiry from the insights of Paul Feyerabend and C.S.Peirce.Here,I contend that Peirce's account of inquiry is overly narrow.More poignantly,I show how Peirce's motto that one should not block the road of inquiry is in conflict with his rejection of skepticism.This is shown using Feyerabend's arguments for pluralism.Nevertheless,I sketch an alternative position that borrows insights from both Peirce and Feyerabend.This position,I contend,retains the crucial elements of each position that drove them while critically developing them in a coherent fashion.This synthesized position offers the beginning of a novel approach to modelling divisions of epistemic labor.
