目的:探讨西安市3岁以下婴幼儿屏幕暴露及语言发育情况。方法:选择2021年4月~2023年3月西安市3岁以下婴幼儿7280例为对象,根据入组婴幼儿年龄分为Objective: To explore the screen exposure and language development of infants and y...目的:探讨西安市3岁以下婴幼儿屏幕暴露及语言发育情况。方法:选择2021年4月~2023年3月西安市3岁以下婴幼儿7280例为对象,根据入组婴幼儿年龄分为Objective: To explore the screen exposure and language development of infants and young children under 3 years old in Xi’an. Method: A total of 7280 infants and young children under 3 years old in Xi’an City from April 2021 to March 2023 were selected as the study subjects. They were divided into the <1-year-old group (n = 2090 cases), the 1~2-year-old group (n = 2150 cases), and the 2~3-year-old group (n = 3040 cases) based on their age. Conduct a survey on screen exposure of infants and young children under 3 years old in this area using the “General Situation Questionnaire” and the “Electronic Product Usage Questionnaire”;we conducted a survey on the language development of infants and young children using the Mandarin version of the Chinese Communication Development Scale—Mandarin Version (CCDI), and conducted a multifactorial analysis on the possible influencing factors of language development in infants and young children. Result: There were statistical differences in the daily screen exposure time, screen exposure time classification, and parents’ attitudes towards children using electronic products among the three groups (P < 0.05);Among the 7280 infants and young children under 3 years old in Xi’an, 1100 were accompanied by varying degrees of language development disorders, accounting for 15.11%;The incidence of language development disorders in the 2~3-year-old group was lower than that in the 1~2-year-old group and <1-year-old group (P < 0.05);The incidence of language development disorders in the 1~2-year-old group was lower than that in the <1-year-old group (P < 0.05);Multiple factor results indicate that daily screen exposure time, screen exposure time classification, and parents’ attitudes towards children’s use of electronic products are independent risk factors for language development ability of infants and young children under 3 years old in Xi’an (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Screen exposure is obvious in infants and young children under 3 years old in Xi’an, which can directly affect their language development. The longer the screen exposure time, the greater the impact on language development ability. Intervention strategies should be developed to shorten screen exposure and promote language development in children.展开更多
目的:调查孤独症儿童屏幕暴露情况及分析屏幕暴露对孤独症儿童发育水平的影响。方法:选取2022年9月至2023年9月来我科心理门诊的ASD儿童62例为研究对象。其中男孩59例,女孩3例,平均年龄(4.31 ± 1.02)岁。研究组和对照组各31人。根...目的:调查孤独症儿童屏幕暴露情况及分析屏幕暴露对孤独症儿童发育水平的影响。方法:选取2022年9月至2023年9月来我科心理门诊的ASD儿童62例为研究对象。其中男孩59例,女孩3例,平均年龄(4.31 ± 1.02)岁。研究组和对照组各31人。根据电子屏幕暴露情况分为屏幕暴露组(>1 h/d)例和非屏幕暴露组(≤1 h/d),使用《GESELL》《ABC》《PEP-3》评价两组儿童的发育水平。结果:1) 孤独症儿童初次接触屏幕的平均月龄为15.32,主要的屏幕暴露类型是电视(40.91%)和手机(40.91%),90.91的屏幕暴露是在家中。2) 两组儿童在是否陪伴幼儿外出或运动、是否对使用时间进行控制、您觉得孩子在使用电子屏幕过程中您可以获得一段不被打扰的时间、认为接触电子屏幕可能将影响孩子的语言表达和孩子主要代养人每天接触电子屏幕总时间方面存在显著差异(p Objective: To investigate the screen exposure of autistic children and analyze the effect of screen exposure on the developmental level of autistic children. Methods: The children with 62 ASD in the psychological clinic from September 2022 to September 2023 were selected as the study subjects. 59 boys and 3 girls, mean age (4.31 ± 1.02). Thirty-one individuals from each of the study and control groups. According to electronic screen exposure, screen exposure (>1 h/d) and non-screen exposure (1 h/d), using GESELL, ABC, PEP-3. Results: 1) The average age of first screen exposure was 15.32, the main screen exposure type was TV (40.91%) and mobile phone (40.91%), and 90.91 was at home. 2) There was a significant difference between the two groups in whether to accompany the children to go out or exercise, control the time during the use of the electronic screen, the total time of the children (p < 0.05);3) the two groups in imitation, perception, cognitive performance and oral cognition scores (p < 0.05). 4) There were significant differences in the two groups of sensation, interaction and somatomotor factor scores (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Screen exposure affects training efficacy and emotional behavior problems. It is necessary to reduce the screen use time of autistic children and their parents, and increase the parent-child interaction, in order to promote the healthy development of emotion and behavior, and improve the efficacy of training.展开更多
目的 了解突发公共卫生事件C O V ID-19疫情下,孕妇不同的应对方式和社会支持对心理健康状况的影响,为改善孕妇心理状态,制定缓解孕妇心理压力,提高妊娠质量,平安度过妊娠期的临床干预策略提供科学依据及参考.方法 于2020年2月20日至26...目的 了解突发公共卫生事件C O V ID-19疫情下,孕妇不同的应对方式和社会支持对心理健康状况的影响,为改善孕妇心理状态,制定缓解孕妇心理压力,提高妊娠质量,平安度过妊娠期的临床干预策略提供科学依据及参考.方法 于2020年2月20日至26日,通过线上平台采取方便抽样方法随机抽取陕西省10个地市1992名孕妇作为调查对象,采用非参数检验、相关分析方法分析孕妇的心理健康状况、应对方式和社会支持情况及其对心理健康的影响.结果 C O V ID-19疫情下不同孕期、学历、居住地、收入和胎次的孕妇积极应对方式得分比较,差异具有统计学意义(H值分别为7.69、124.27、68.29、66.13、11.05,均P<0.05),不同年龄和居住地的孕妇在消极应对方式上得分比较,差异具有统计学意义(H值分别为16.18、90.52,均P<0.05);不同孕期、学历、收入的孕妇社会支持得分比较,差异具有统计学意义(H值分别为7.63、25.76、11.79,均P<0.05).在心理健康状况方面,孕晚期和孕中期得分显著低于孕早期(H=10.00,P<0.05),学历越高、收入越高、城市、第三胎及以上的孕妇心理健康状况越差(H值分别为14.12、30.02、10.44、17.29,均P<0.05);Spearman相关分析显示,积极应对方式得分、消极应对方式得分、社会支持总分与心理健康状况显著相关(r值分别为-0.09、0.15、-0.28,均P<0.01).回归分析显示,社会支持(β=-0.24)、消极应对方式(β=0.29)、积极应对方式(β=-0.16),可以预测心理健康状况(F=119.08,P<0.001).结论 孕早期、高学历、城市、高收入的孕妇是疫情期间出现心理问题的高危人群,孕妇获得的社会支持、采取的应对策略是疫情期间影响心理健康状况的重要因素.展开更多
文摘目的:探讨西安市3岁以下婴幼儿屏幕暴露及语言发育情况。方法:选择2021年4月~2023年3月西安市3岁以下婴幼儿7280例为对象,根据入组婴幼儿年龄分为Objective: To explore the screen exposure and language development of infants and young children under 3 years old in Xi’an. Method: A total of 7280 infants and young children under 3 years old in Xi’an City from April 2021 to March 2023 were selected as the study subjects. They were divided into the <1-year-old group (n = 2090 cases), the 1~2-year-old group (n = 2150 cases), and the 2~3-year-old group (n = 3040 cases) based on their age. Conduct a survey on screen exposure of infants and young children under 3 years old in this area using the “General Situation Questionnaire” and the “Electronic Product Usage Questionnaire”;we conducted a survey on the language development of infants and young children using the Mandarin version of the Chinese Communication Development Scale—Mandarin Version (CCDI), and conducted a multifactorial analysis on the possible influencing factors of language development in infants and young children. Result: There were statistical differences in the daily screen exposure time, screen exposure time classification, and parents’ attitudes towards children using electronic products among the three groups (P < 0.05);Among the 7280 infants and young children under 3 years old in Xi’an, 1100 were accompanied by varying degrees of language development disorders, accounting for 15.11%;The incidence of language development disorders in the 2~3-year-old group was lower than that in the 1~2-year-old group and <1-year-old group (P < 0.05);The incidence of language development disorders in the 1~2-year-old group was lower than that in the <1-year-old group (P < 0.05);Multiple factor results indicate that daily screen exposure time, screen exposure time classification, and parents’ attitudes towards children’s use of electronic products are independent risk factors for language development ability of infants and young children under 3 years old in Xi’an (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Screen exposure is obvious in infants and young children under 3 years old in Xi’an, which can directly affect their language development. The longer the screen exposure time, the greater the impact on language development ability. Intervention strategies should be developed to shorten screen exposure and promote language development in children.
文摘目的:调查孤独症儿童屏幕暴露情况及分析屏幕暴露对孤独症儿童发育水平的影响。方法:选取2022年9月至2023年9月来我科心理门诊的ASD儿童62例为研究对象。其中男孩59例,女孩3例,平均年龄(4.31 ± 1.02)岁。研究组和对照组各31人。根据电子屏幕暴露情况分为屏幕暴露组(>1 h/d)例和非屏幕暴露组(≤1 h/d),使用《GESELL》《ABC》《PEP-3》评价两组儿童的发育水平。结果:1) 孤独症儿童初次接触屏幕的平均月龄为15.32,主要的屏幕暴露类型是电视(40.91%)和手机(40.91%),90.91的屏幕暴露是在家中。2) 两组儿童在是否陪伴幼儿外出或运动、是否对使用时间进行控制、您觉得孩子在使用电子屏幕过程中您可以获得一段不被打扰的时间、认为接触电子屏幕可能将影响孩子的语言表达和孩子主要代养人每天接触电子屏幕总时间方面存在显著差异(p Objective: To investigate the screen exposure of autistic children and analyze the effect of screen exposure on the developmental level of autistic children. Methods: The children with 62 ASD in the psychological clinic from September 2022 to September 2023 were selected as the study subjects. 59 boys and 3 girls, mean age (4.31 ± 1.02). Thirty-one individuals from each of the study and control groups. According to electronic screen exposure, screen exposure (>1 h/d) and non-screen exposure (1 h/d), using GESELL, ABC, PEP-3. Results: 1) The average age of first screen exposure was 15.32, the main screen exposure type was TV (40.91%) and mobile phone (40.91%), and 90.91 was at home. 2) There was a significant difference between the two groups in whether to accompany the children to go out or exercise, control the time during the use of the electronic screen, the total time of the children (p < 0.05);3) the two groups in imitation, perception, cognitive performance and oral cognition scores (p < 0.05). 4) There were significant differences in the two groups of sensation, interaction and somatomotor factor scores (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Screen exposure affects training efficacy and emotional behavior problems. It is necessary to reduce the screen use time of autistic children and their parents, and increase the parent-child interaction, in order to promote the healthy development of emotion and behavior, and improve the efficacy of training.
文摘目的 了解突发公共卫生事件C O V ID-19疫情下,孕妇不同的应对方式和社会支持对心理健康状况的影响,为改善孕妇心理状态,制定缓解孕妇心理压力,提高妊娠质量,平安度过妊娠期的临床干预策略提供科学依据及参考.方法 于2020年2月20日至26日,通过线上平台采取方便抽样方法随机抽取陕西省10个地市1992名孕妇作为调查对象,采用非参数检验、相关分析方法分析孕妇的心理健康状况、应对方式和社会支持情况及其对心理健康的影响.结果 C O V ID-19疫情下不同孕期、学历、居住地、收入和胎次的孕妇积极应对方式得分比较,差异具有统计学意义(H值分别为7.69、124.27、68.29、66.13、11.05,均P<0.05),不同年龄和居住地的孕妇在消极应对方式上得分比较,差异具有统计学意义(H值分别为16.18、90.52,均P<0.05);不同孕期、学历、收入的孕妇社会支持得分比较,差异具有统计学意义(H值分别为7.63、25.76、11.79,均P<0.05).在心理健康状况方面,孕晚期和孕中期得分显著低于孕早期(H=10.00,P<0.05),学历越高、收入越高、城市、第三胎及以上的孕妇心理健康状况越差(H值分别为14.12、30.02、10.44、17.29,均P<0.05);Spearman相关分析显示,积极应对方式得分、消极应对方式得分、社会支持总分与心理健康状况显著相关(r值分别为-0.09、0.15、-0.28,均P<0.01).回归分析显示,社会支持(β=-0.24)、消极应对方式(β=0.29)、积极应对方式(β=-0.16),可以预测心理健康状况(F=119.08,P<0.001).结论 孕早期、高学历、城市、高收入的孕妇是疫情期间出现心理问题的高危人群,孕妇获得的社会支持、采取的应对策略是疫情期间影响心理健康状况的重要因素.
