目的介绍1例维得利珠单抗(VDZ)致间质性肺炎的病例,汇总分析该药相关肺毒性的发生特点,为临床安全用药提供参考。方法从临床药师角度出发,回顾性分析1例VDZ致间质性肺炎患者的诊治过程,并进行不良反应相关性分析;检索中国知网、维普网、...目的介绍1例维得利珠单抗(VDZ)致间质性肺炎的病例,汇总分析该药相关肺毒性的发生特点,为临床安全用药提供参考。方法从临床药师角度出发,回顾性分析1例VDZ致间质性肺炎患者的诊治过程,并进行不良反应相关性分析;检索中国知网、维普网、PubMed、Web of Science等中英文数据库,对VDZ相关肺毒性的病例报道进行汇总分析。结果该患者在使用VDZ期间发生间质性肺炎,予抗菌药物经验性抗感染治疗无改善;停用VDZ并予甲泼尼龙治疗后,患者的症状及影像学检查均有改善但仍提示间质性肺炎。经Naranjo's不良反应评估量表评估并根据我国《药品不良反应报告和监测工作手册》判断,VDZ与间质性肺炎的关联性均为“很可能”。文献分析结果显示,纳入的29例患者(含本文报道的患者)中,男性19例、女性10例,平均年龄(49.24±17.06)岁;肺毒性主要包括VDZ相关性肺炎、嗜酸性粒细胞肺炎、肺肉芽肿或坏死性结节、间质性肺损伤等,多发生在用药后24周以内(58.62%),主要临床表现为咳嗽、呼吸困难、发热等;绝大多数患者经停药和/或给予糖皮质激素等治疗后好转或康复,1例患者因呼吸衰竭死亡。结论肺毒性为VDZ较罕见的不良反应,起病隐匿且症状无特异性。一旦患者出现咳嗽、呼吸困难等症状,临床应早期判断、及时停药,并给予糖皮质激素等对症治疗,以保障患者用药安全。展开更多
目的:比较伏诺拉生和奥美拉唑在治疗胃食管反流病方面的临床疗效。方法:在2023年1月到2023年12月的时间段内,选取在荣成市人民医院治疗的84名胃食管反流病患者,随机分为观察组42人选用伏诺拉生片进行治疗,对照组42人选用奥美拉唑肠溶胶...目的:比较伏诺拉生和奥美拉唑在治疗胃食管反流病方面的临床疗效。方法:在2023年1月到2023年12月的时间段内,选取在荣成市人民医院治疗的84名胃食管反流病患者,随机分为观察组42人选用伏诺拉生片进行治疗,对照组42人选用奥美拉唑肠溶胶囊进行治疗,随后对两组的治疗效果进行了对比分析。结果:观察组的治疗总有效率明显高于对照组(95.24% vs. 85.71%, P P均 P χ2 = 0.091, P = 0.763)。结论:伏诺拉生片对胃食管反流病有较好的临床疗效,在改善患者生活质量的同时,能减轻患者的症状,降低炎症因子水平,安全性较好。Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of vonoprazan and omeprazole in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Methods: During the period from January 2023 to December 2023, 84 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease treated in Rongcheng People’s Hospital were selected, 42 patients in the observation group were selected with vonoprazan tablets for treatment, and 42 patients in the control group chose omeprazole enteric capsules for treatment. Subsequently, the treatment effect of the two groups was compared. Results: The overall response rate in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (95.24% vs. 85.71%, P P P 2 = 0.091, P = 0.763). Conclusion: Vonoprazan has a good clinical effect on gastroesophageal reflux disease, can reduce the symptoms of patients, improve the quality of life of patients, reduce the level of inflammatory factors, and the safety is good.展开更多
文摘目的介绍1例维得利珠单抗(VDZ)致间质性肺炎的病例,汇总分析该药相关肺毒性的发生特点,为临床安全用药提供参考。方法从临床药师角度出发,回顾性分析1例VDZ致间质性肺炎患者的诊治过程,并进行不良反应相关性分析;检索中国知网、维普网、PubMed、Web of Science等中英文数据库,对VDZ相关肺毒性的病例报道进行汇总分析。结果该患者在使用VDZ期间发生间质性肺炎,予抗菌药物经验性抗感染治疗无改善;停用VDZ并予甲泼尼龙治疗后,患者的症状及影像学检查均有改善但仍提示间质性肺炎。经Naranjo's不良反应评估量表评估并根据我国《药品不良反应报告和监测工作手册》判断,VDZ与间质性肺炎的关联性均为“很可能”。文献分析结果显示,纳入的29例患者(含本文报道的患者)中,男性19例、女性10例,平均年龄(49.24±17.06)岁;肺毒性主要包括VDZ相关性肺炎、嗜酸性粒细胞肺炎、肺肉芽肿或坏死性结节、间质性肺损伤等,多发生在用药后24周以内(58.62%),主要临床表现为咳嗽、呼吸困难、发热等;绝大多数患者经停药和/或给予糖皮质激素等治疗后好转或康复,1例患者因呼吸衰竭死亡。结论肺毒性为VDZ较罕见的不良反应,起病隐匿且症状无特异性。一旦患者出现咳嗽、呼吸困难等症状,临床应早期判断、及时停药,并给予糖皮质激素等对症治疗,以保障患者用药安全。
文摘目的:比较伏诺拉生和奥美拉唑在治疗胃食管反流病方面的临床疗效。方法:在2023年1月到2023年12月的时间段内,选取在荣成市人民医院治疗的84名胃食管反流病患者,随机分为观察组42人选用伏诺拉生片进行治疗,对照组42人选用奥美拉唑肠溶胶囊进行治疗,随后对两组的治疗效果进行了对比分析。结果:观察组的治疗总有效率明显高于对照组(95.24% vs. 85.71%, P P均 P χ2 = 0.091, P = 0.763)。结论:伏诺拉生片对胃食管反流病有较好的临床疗效,在改善患者生活质量的同时,能减轻患者的症状,降低炎症因子水平,安全性较好。Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of vonoprazan and omeprazole in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Methods: During the period from January 2023 to December 2023, 84 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease treated in Rongcheng People’s Hospital were selected, 42 patients in the observation group were selected with vonoprazan tablets for treatment, and 42 patients in the control group chose omeprazole enteric capsules for treatment. Subsequently, the treatment effect of the two groups was compared. Results: The overall response rate in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (95.24% vs. 85.71%, P P P 2 = 0.091, P = 0.763). Conclusion: Vonoprazan has a good clinical effect on gastroesophageal reflux disease, can reduce the symptoms of patients, improve the quality of life of patients, reduce the level of inflammatory factors, and the safety is good.