The literature on cervical embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma(RMS) is reviewed here to identify management guidelines for middle-aged women diagnosed with this rare type of gynecologic cancer. Specifically, the Pub Med, Web o...The literature on cervical embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma(RMS) is reviewed here to identify management guidelines for middle-aged women diagnosed with this rare type of gynecologic cancer. Specifically, the Pub Med, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases, were searched to find published case series on cervical embryonal RMS reporting on four or more patients, of whom at least one was > 40-year-old. The χ2 test was used to assess heterogeneity. Five articles published between 1986 and 2013 were identified, reporting on a total of 47 patients, of whom 22(46.8%) were older and 25(53.2%) younger than 40-year-old. Although the two age groups did not differ significantly by stage of disease or radiotherapy treatment, the older age groupreceived less chemotherapy(55% vs 90%, P = 0.008)and had more hysterectomy(86% vs 43%, P = 0.009).Follow-up data was missing for 18/47(38.3%) patients.Among the 29 patients with follow-up data, survival was shorter in the older group, with 8/12(67%) alive and3 with disease at a median follow-up of 2.6 years, as compared with the younger group that had 15/17(88%)alive and none with disease at a median follow-up of 3.5years. The longest survivals among the older women were observed in those who received radiotherapy,including one case with a resected lung metastasis.A prospective multi-institutional collaboration and better follow-up are needed to determine the optimal management of cervical embryonal RMS. Long-term survival appears feasible if management is accompanied by chemotherapy and radiotherapy.展开更多
文摘The literature on cervical embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma(RMS) is reviewed here to identify management guidelines for middle-aged women diagnosed with this rare type of gynecologic cancer. Specifically, the Pub Med, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases, were searched to find published case series on cervical embryonal RMS reporting on four or more patients, of whom at least one was > 40-year-old. The χ2 test was used to assess heterogeneity. Five articles published between 1986 and 2013 were identified, reporting on a total of 47 patients, of whom 22(46.8%) were older and 25(53.2%) younger than 40-year-old. Although the two age groups did not differ significantly by stage of disease or radiotherapy treatment, the older age groupreceived less chemotherapy(55% vs 90%, P = 0.008)and had more hysterectomy(86% vs 43%, P = 0.009).Follow-up data was missing for 18/47(38.3%) patients.Among the 29 patients with follow-up data, survival was shorter in the older group, with 8/12(67%) alive and3 with disease at a median follow-up of 2.6 years, as compared with the younger group that had 15/17(88%)alive and none with disease at a median follow-up of 3.5years. The longest survivals among the older women were observed in those who received radiotherapy,including one case with a resected lung metastasis.A prospective multi-institutional collaboration and better follow-up are needed to determine the optimal management of cervical embryonal RMS. Long-term survival appears feasible if management is accompanied by chemotherapy and radiotherapy.
