期刊文献+
共找到3篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Intellectual Property Protection in China's First E-Commerce Law
1
作者 Li Xi Huang Yongjie 《China's Foreign Trade》 2018年第6期60-61,共2页
On August31st of2018,the E-commerce Law of the People’s Republic of China was approved by voting at the5th meeting of the13th standing committee of the National People’s Congress and is to take effect on January1st ... On August31st of2018,the E-commerce Law of the People’s Republic of China was approved by voting at the5th meeting of the13th standing committee of the National People’s Congress and is to take effect on January1st of2019.The new E-commerce Law mentions“intellectual property”12times,stresses protection of intellectual property ine-commerce,defines rights and obligations of the e-commerce platform operators and merchants at the platform,and strengthens protection of e-commerce consumers. 展开更多
关键词 INTELLECTUAL COMMERCE committee HOLDER operators PARTIES approved preliminary COPYRIGHT REPUBLIC
下载PDF
Zero Tolerance for Bad Faith Trademarks By Chinese Authorities
2
作者 Ling Zhao Qin Li 《China's Foreign Trade》 2022年第4期62-63,共2页
Article 4 of the China Trademark Law regulates that the registration of bad faith trademarks without any intent to be used should be rejected.How should this article be interpreted and what factors should be considere... Article 4 of the China Trademark Law regulates that the registration of bad faith trademarks without any intent to be used should be rejected.How should this article be interpreted and what factors should be considered in order to determine if a trademark application is filed in bad faith or not?What should we know about bad faith trademarks in China? 展开更多
关键词 TRADE rejected filed
下载PDF
Re-Analysis of "PRETUL" Retrial Case in Terms of Infringement Judgment Criterion
3
作者 Dong Xiaomeng 《China's Foreign Trade》 2016年第2期38-39,共2页
[Brief introduction of"PRETUL"retrial case]The plaintiff(hereinafter"FOCKER")was the owner of the registered mark"PRETUL"in China.It alleged that the defendant(hereinafter"YAHUAN&quo... [Brief introduction of"PRETUL"retrial case]The plaintiff(hereinafter"FOCKER")was the owner of the registered mark"PRETUL"in China.It alleged that the defendant(hereinafter"YAHUAN",a Chinese company)had infringed its trademark rights by using same or similar mark"PRETUL".The"PRETUL"branded padlocks manufactured by YAHUAN were all entrusted by"TURPER"(a Mexican dealer) 展开更多
关键词 TRADEMARK registered hereinafter Mexican CRITERION manufactured goods dealer OWNER EXPORTED
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部