期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
社区2型糖尿病及糖尿病前期管理现状调查研究 被引量:23
1
作者 王俊薇 管丽华 +5 位作者 邢媛 彭岩 周婉滢 薛慧娟 刘云 李连喜 《中国全科医学》 CAS 北大核心 2021年第27期3439-3443,3450,共6页
背景我国成年2型糖尿病及糖尿病前期患病率高,但糖尿病治疗率和治疗控制率低。糖尿病前期人群可出现糖尿病并发症,且患病率高于正常人群。目前社区糖尿病管理针对糖尿病前期的干预、慢性并发症筛查、科普宣传等缺乏相应的证据。目的调... 背景我国成年2型糖尿病及糖尿病前期患病率高,但糖尿病治疗率和治疗控制率低。糖尿病前期人群可出现糖尿病并发症,且患病率高于正常人群。目前社区糖尿病管理针对糖尿病前期的干预、慢性并发症筛查、科普宣传等缺乏相应的证据。目的调查、分析社区2型糖尿病及糖尿病前期人群糖尿病管理现状,为优化社区糖尿病管理提供依据。方法选取2020年11月-2021年1月在上海市安亭、真如、曹杨、青村、桃浦社区卫生服务中心就诊的糖尿病前期人群101例及2型糖尿病患者1055例。采用流行病学调查方法,向调查对象发放流行病学调查表。收集调查对象一般资料,并比较糖尿病前期人群和2型糖尿病患者生活方式干预率、药物治疗率、慢性并发症筛查率及科普宣传教育率。结果2型糖尿病患者生活方式干预率和药物治疗率高于糖尿病前期人群(P<0.05)。糖尿病前期人群慢性并发症筛查率为19.8%(20/101),低于2型糖尿病患者的78.6%(829/1055)(P<0.001)。已行慢性并发症筛查的糖尿病前期人群中未发现糖尿病慢性并发症,低于2型糖尿病患者的24.7%(205/829)(P=0.022)。糖尿病前期人群接受科普宣传教育率为27.7%(28/101),低于2型糖尿病患者的67.2%(709/1055)(P<0.001)。结论社区糖尿病前期人群的生活方式干预率、慢性并发症筛查率及接受科普宣传教育率均明显低于2型糖尿病患者,提示社区对糖尿病前期人群管理重视程度不足,亟待改进。 展开更多
关键词 糖尿病 糖尿病前期 糖尿病并发症 疾病管理 糖尿病管理 健康教育
下载PDF
Comparison of Body Mass Index with Body Fat Percentage in the Evaluation of Obesity in Chinese 被引量:18
2
作者 CHEN WANG Xu-HONG HOU +5 位作者 MING-LIANG ZHANG Yu-QIAN BAO Yu-HUA ZOU WEN-HONG ZHONG KUN-SAN XIANG WEI-PING JIA 《Biomedical and Environmental Sciences》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2010年第3期173-179,共7页
Objective To evaluate the present Chinese body mass index (BMI) criteria with body fat percentage (BF%) in determining obesity in Chinese population. Methods A total of 4 907 subjects (age: 20-90 yrs) were enro... Objective To evaluate the present Chinese body mass index (BMI) criteria with body fat percentage (BF%) in determining obesity in Chinese population. Methods A total of 4 907 subjects (age: 20-90 yrs) were enrolled in the baselirie survey of a longitudinal epidemiological study, and 2 638 of them were reevaluated in 5.5 years later. The Chinese BMI and WHO BF% were used to define obesity, respectively. Results The diagnostic agreement between the Chinese BMI and WHO BF% definitions for obesity was poor for both men (kappa: 0.210, 95% CI: 0.179-0.241) and women (kappa: 0.327, 95% CI: 0.296-0.358). However, BMI had a good correlation with BF% both in men (r: 0.785, P〈0.01) and women (r: 0.864, P〈0.01). The age and sex-adjusted relative risks (RR) for incidence of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) were significantly higher in subjects with intermediate BF% (BF%:20.1%-25% for men, 30.1%-35% for women) (RR: 2.35, 95% CI: 1.23-4.48) and high BF%(BF%〉25% for men and 〉35% for women)(RR: 2.89, 95% CI: 1.43-5.81), or in subjects with high BMI (BMI≥ 28 kg/m2) (RR: 2.46, 95% CI: 1.31-4.63) when compared to those with low BF% (BF%≤20% for men ands〈30% for women) or low BMI (BMI〈24 kg/m^2) respectively. No difference in risk could be found in those with intermediate BMI (BMI: 24-27.9 kg/m^2) (RR: 1.44, 95% CI: 0.86-2.40), as compared to those with low BMI (BMI〈24 kg/m^2), whose BF% ranged widely from 7.8 to 50.3%. Conclusion BMI was correlated with BF%. Both BMI and BF% were associated with high risk for T2DM. However, BMI had its limitations in the interpretation of subjects with BMI between 24 and 27.9 kg/m^2. 展开更多
关键词 BMI BF% OBESITY
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部