期刊文献+
共找到4篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Morphological characterization of fungi associated with the ascochyta blight complex and pathogenic variability of Mycosphaerella pinodes on field pea crops in central Alberta 被引量:1
1
作者 Hafiz Ahmed Kan-Fa Chang +5 位作者 Sheau-Fang Hwang Heting Fu Qixing Zhou Stephen Strelkov Robert Conner Bruce Gossen 《The Crop Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2015年第1期10-18,共9页
Field pea crops in central Alberta were surveyed for ascochyta blight from 2011 to 2012 and fungal isolates were recovered from foliar lesions on selected plants. Cultural and microscopic characterization of the 275 i... Field pea crops in central Alberta were surveyed for ascochyta blight from 2011 to 2012 and fungal isolates were recovered from foliar lesions on selected plants. Cultural and microscopic characterization of the 275 isolates obtained revealed that 272 were of Mycosphaerella pinodes and three were of Phoma medicaginis var. pinodella. Ascochyta pisi or Phoma koolunga were not identified. Isolates of M. pinodes were divided into two groups,GI and GII, based on visual assessment of culture characteristics. GI isolates(light to dark, mostly gray colony color; pycnidial distribution radial and concentric; conidia10.5–14.5 × 4.2–6.2 μm most with one septum, occasionally two, constricted at the septum;spore mass light buff to flesh color) were predominant(83%), while GII isolates(dark to gray colony color; pycnidia abundant; conidia 8–16 × 3.5–6.2 μm most with 1 septum, constricted at the septum; spore mass light buff to flesh color) were less common(17%). The cultures of GII isolates were similar to recent descriptions of A. pisi, but they differed in spore color. In a host differential study, 13 pathotypes of M. pinodes were identified from 110 single-spore isolates. Pathotype I was predominant(88 isolates) and virulent on all nine differential genotypes. The other pathotypes(pathotypes II–XIII) were rare(1–6 isolates of each).Comparison of the present results with earlier studies suggests that pathotype I has been prevalent for many years, and that its aggressiveness on the host differentials has increased over time. Emphasis should be placed on breeding for resistance to M. pinodes in field pea cultivars intended for deployment in central Alberta. 展开更多
关键词 ASCOCHYTA PHOMA Resistance VIRULENCE PATHOTYPE
下载PDF
根肿菌生理小种鉴定与甘蓝型油菜品种资源的抗性评价 被引量:19
2
作者 费维新 HWANG Sheau-fang +9 位作者 王淑芬 吴晓芸 高智谋 李强生 侯树敏 荣松柏 江莹芬 雷伟侠 郝仲萍 胡宝成 《中国油料作物学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第5期626-639,共14页
为了鉴定评价油菜根肿病菌致病性的分化与甘蓝型油菜品种资源的抗性,利用Williams鉴别寄主系统鉴定了分离自安徽等6个省病区的16个根肿病菌菌株的生理小种(致病型),并利用温室人工接种技术鉴定评价了12份油菜抗性材料的差异、病圃鉴定了... 为了鉴定评价油菜根肿病菌致病性的分化与甘蓝型油菜品种资源的抗性,利用Williams鉴别寄主系统鉴定了分离自安徽等6个省病区的16个根肿病菌菌株的生理小种(致病型),并利用温室人工接种技术鉴定评价了12份油菜抗性材料的差异、病圃鉴定了176份油菜品种资源的抗性。结果表明,来自安徽(休宁、黟县、广德)、湖北(沙阳、当阳)、四川(广汉、眉县、邛崃)和贵州金沙的油菜根肿病菌菌株为4号小种,安徽宁国、云南楚雄、湖南桃江、辽宁沈阳和黑龙江阿城的菌株为2号小种,安徽绩溪的菌株为5号小种,湖北黄陂的菌株为7号小种。在温室人工接种条件下,12份抗性资源对2号、4号和5号小种等表现出不同程度的抗性,其中抗性材料CR5对来自安徽休宁、黟县、广德和四川广汉的4号小种、安徽宁国2号小种和安徽绩溪5号小种均表现出完全的免疫抗性。田间病圃鉴定结果表明种都油998和蓉油9号两个品种表现抗病(R),富油杂118等11个品种表现中抗(MR)。 展开更多
关键词 甘蓝型油菜 根肿菌 生理小种 抗病性 种质资源
下载PDF
Evaluation of host resistance and fungicide application as tools for the management of root rot of field pea caused by Aphanomyces euteiches
3
作者 Longfei Wu Kan-Fa Chang +4 位作者 Sheau-Fang Hwang Robert Conner Rudolph Fredua-Agyeman David Feindel Stephen E.Strelkov 《The Crop Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2019年第1期38-48,共11页
Aphanomyces root rot(ARR) of field pea(Pisum sativum), caused by Aphanomyces euteiches, can cause severe root damage, wilting, and large yield losses under wet soil conditions. To identify ways to manage this disease,... Aphanomyces root rot(ARR) of field pea(Pisum sativum), caused by Aphanomyces euteiches, can cause severe root damage, wilting, and large yield losses under wet soil conditions. To identify ways to manage this disease, the effect of A. euteiches inoculum density on field pea was studied under greenhouse and field conditions in 2015 and 2016. Increases in inoculum density reduced seedling emergence, root nodulation, and plant vigor, and resulted in increased root rot severity in both field and greenhouse tests. Seed treatments with the fungicides Apron Advance(thiabendazole + fludioxonil + metalaxyl) + Vibrance(difenoconazole + metalaxylM + sedaxane), INTEGO Solo(ethaboxam), BAS 516F(boscalid + pyraclostrobin), BAS 720F(metalaxyl + pyraclostrobin + fluxapyroxad), and BAS 516F + BAS 720F(3:1) were evaluated for their efficacy against ARR. All seed treatments except Apron Advance + Vibrance reduced root rot severity under controlled conditions. BAS 516F, BAS 720F and INTEGO Solo improved plant vigor and all treatments reduced seedling blight to varying degrees under greenhouse conditions, but not in the field. A collection of 22 pea genotypes was evaluated for resistance to root rot in field plot experiments. Line 00–2067 showed the least severe root rot symptoms,whereas ‘Spring D' showed the lowest reduction in yield. The results suggest that there may be an opportunity to combine partial host resistance and fungicidal seed treatments to adequately manage ARR of field pea. 展开更多
关键词 APHANOMYCES euteiches Field PEA Fungicides INOCULUM density Resistance
下载PDF
芸薹根肿菌排孢管的显微与超显微结构观察 被引量:1
4
作者 费维新 冯杰 +3 位作者 Hwang Sheaufang 荣松柏 李强生 高智谋 《植物保护学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第4期701-702,共2页
根肿病是重要的十字花科作物土传病害,病原菌为专性寄生的芸苔根肿菌Plasmodiophora brassica Woron.,属根肿菌目芸苔根肿菌属,主要侵染寄主植物根部形成根肿症状。根肿菌侵染包括根毛侵染和皮层中柱侵染2个阶段,在外界环境条件适... 根肿病是重要的十字花科作物土传病害,病原菌为专性寄生的芸苔根肿菌Plasmodiophora brassica Woron.,属根肿菌目芸苔根肿菌属,主要侵染寄主植物根部形成根肿症状。根肿菌侵染包括根毛侵染和皮层中柱侵染2个阶段,在外界环境条件适宜的情况下,根肿菌休眠孢子萌发释放的初生游动孢子侵染寄主根毛并形成游动孢子囊产生次生游动孢子,次生游动孢子再侵染根毛或者是成对融合进而侵染皮层细胞形成根肿(Kageyama&Asano,2009),但是根肿菌侵染寄主的具体过程与细节尚不清楚。Feieta1.(2016)报道了在根肿菌侵染寄主过程中存在游动孢子囊排孢管的现象。本试验通过对根肿菌游动孢子囊排孢管进行显微与超显微结构观察与研究,以期为根肿菌生活史中的侵染寄主研究以及病原菌与寄主的互作机制研究提供理论依据。 展开更多
关键词 根肿菌 结构观察 brassica 芸薹 十字花科作物 游动孢子 再侵染 皮层细胞
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部