Hepatocellular carcinoma presenting as an extrahepatic mass:A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)is a primary liver tumor generally diagnosed based on radiographic findings.Metastatic disease is typically associated with increased tumor diameter,multifocality,and vascular invasion.We report a case of a patient who presented with extrahepatic HCC metastasis to a portocaval lymph node with occult hepatic primary on computed tomography(CT).We review the literature for cases of extrahepatic HCC presentation without known hepatic lesions and discuss strategies to differentiate between metastatic and ectopic HCC.CASE SUMMARY A 67-year-old male with remotely treated hepatis C was referred for evaluation of an enlarging portocaval,mixed cystic-solid mass.Serial CT evaluations demonstrated steatosis,but no cirrhosis or liver lesions.Endoscopic ultrasound demonstrated a normal-appearing pancreas,biliary tree,and liver.Fine needle aspiration yielded atypical cells.The differential diagnosis included duodenal or pancreatic cyst,lymphoproliferative cyst,stromal or mesenchymal lesions,nodal involvement from gastrointestinal or hematologic malignancy,or duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumor.After review by a multidisciplinary tumor board,the patient underwent open surgical resection of a 5.2 cm×5.5 cm retroperitoneal mass with pathology consistent with moderately-differentiated HCC.Magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)subsequently demonstrated a 1.2 cm segment VIII hepatic lesion with late arterial enhancement,fatty sparing,and intrinsic T1 hyperintensity.Alpha fetoprotein was 23.3 ng/mL.The patient was diagnosed with HCC with portocaval nodal involvement.Review:We surveyed the literature for HCC presenting as extrahepatic masses without history of concurrent or prior intrahepatic HCC.We identified 18 cases of extrahepatic HCC ultimately found to represent metastatic lesions,and 30 cases of extrahepatic HCC found to be primary,ectopic HCC.CONCLUSION Hepatocellular carcinoma can seldomly present with extrahepatic metastasis in the setting of occult primary.In patients with risk factors for HCC and lesions suspicious for metastatic disease,MRI may be integral to identifying small hepatic lesions and differentiating from ectopic HCC.Tumor markers may also have utility in establishing the diagnosis.

Long-term survival of patients with stage Ⅱ and Ⅲgastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy with inadequate nodal assessment

BACKGROUND Gastric cancer is an aggressive disease with frequent lymph node(LN)involvement.The NCCN recommends a D2 lymphadenectomy and the harvesting of at least 16 LNs.This threshold has been the subject of great debate,not only for the extent of surgery but also for more appropriate staging.The reclassification of stage IIB through IIIC based on N3b nodal staging in the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer(AJCC)staging system highlights the efforts to more accurately discriminate survival expectancy based on nodal number.Furthermore,studies have suggested that pathologic assessment of 30 or more LNs improve prognostic accuracy and is required for proper staging of gastriccancer.AIM To evaluate the long-term survival of advanced gastric cancer patients who deviated from expected survival curves because of inadequate nodal evaluation.METHODS Eligible patients were identified from the Surveillance,Epidemiology,and End Results database.Those with stage II-III gastric cancer were considered for inclusion.Three groups were compared based on the number of analyzed LNs.They were inadequate LN assessment(ILA,<16 LNs),adequate LN assessment(ALA,16-29 LNs),and optimal LN assessment(OLA,≥30 LNs).The main outcomes were overall survival(OS)and cancer-specific survival.Data were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method,log-rank test,hazard risk,and Cox proportional univariate and multivariate models.Propensity score matching(PSM)was used to compare the ALA and OLA groups.RESULTS The analysis included 11607 patients.Most had advanced T stages(T3=48%;T4=42%).The pathological AJCC stage distribution was IIA=22%,IIB=18%,IIIA=26%,IIIB=22%,and IIIC=12%.The overall sample divided by the study objective included ILA(50%),ALA(35%),and OLA(15%).Median OS was 24 mo for the ILA group,29 mo for the ALA group,and 34 mo for the OLA group(P<0.001).Univariate analysis showed that the ALA and OLA groups had better OS than the ILA group[ALA hazard ratio(HR)=0.84,95%confidence interval(CI):0.79-0.88,P<0.001 and OLA HR=0.73,95%CI:0.68-0.79,P<0.001].The OS outcome was confirmed by multivariate analysis(ALA HR=0.68,95%CI:0.64-0.71,P<0.001 and OLA:HR=0.48,95%CI:0.44-0.52,P<0.001).A 1:1 PSM analysis in 3428 patients found that the OLA group had better survival than the ALA group(OS:OLA median=34 mo vs ALA median=26 mo,P<0.001,which was confirmed by univariate analysis(HR=0.81,95%CI:0.75-0.89,P<0.001)and multivariate analysis:(HR=0.71,95%CI:0.65-0.78,P<0.001).CONCLUSION Proper nodal staging is a critical issue in gastric cancer.Assessment of an inadequate number of LNs places patients at high risk of adverse long-term survival outcomes.

Roux-en-Y augmented gastric advancement: An alternative technique for concurrent esophageal and pyloric stenosis secondary to corrosive intake

Select group of patients with concurrent esophagealand gastric stricturing secondary to corrosive intake requires colonic or free jejunal transfer. These technically demanding reconstructions are associated with significant complications and have up to 18% ischemic conduit necrosis. Following corrosive intake, up to 30% of such patients have stricturing at the pyloro-duodenal canal area only and rest of the stomach is available for rather less complex and better perfused gastrointestinal reconstruction. Here we describe an alternative technique where we utilize stomach following distal gastric resection along with Roux-en-Y reconstruction instead of colonic or jejunal interposition. This neo-conduit is potentially superior in terms of perfusion, lower risk of gastro-esophageal anastomotic leakage and technical ease as opposed to colonic and jejunal counterparts. We have utilized the said technique in three patients with acceptable postoperative outcome. In addition this technique offers a feasible reconstruction plan in patients where colon is not available for reconstruction due to concomitant pathology. Utility of this technique may also merit consideration for gastroesophageal junction tumors.