Objective:To compare pre-and post-radical prostatectomy(RP)responses in the urinary incontinence domain of Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26(EPIC-26)in cohorts from the USA,Norway and Spain.Methods:A prospec...Objective:To compare pre-and post-radical prostatectomy(RP)responses in the urinary incontinence domain of Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26(EPIC-26)in cohorts from the USA,Norway and Spain.Methods:A prospective study of pre-and 1-year post-treatment responses in American(nZ537),Norwegian(nZ520)and Spanish(nZ111)patients,establishing the prevalence of urinary incontinence defined according to published dichotomization.Thereafter we focused on the response alternatives“occasional dribbling”,pad use and problem experience.A multivariate logistic regression analysis(significance level≤0.01)considered risk factors for“not retaining total control”.展开更多
基金The study was funded by a grant from Health-RegionSouth. East, Norway (No. 8324).
文摘Objective:To compare pre-and post-radical prostatectomy(RP)responses in the urinary incontinence domain of Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26(EPIC-26)in cohorts from the USA,Norway and Spain.Methods:A prospective study of pre-and 1-year post-treatment responses in American(nZ537),Norwegian(nZ520)and Spanish(nZ111)patients,establishing the prevalence of urinary incontinence defined according to published dichotomization.Thereafter we focused on the response alternatives“occasional dribbling”,pad use and problem experience.A multivariate logistic regression analysis(significance level≤0.01)considered risk factors for“not retaining total control”.
