Radiofrequency ablation of recurrent cholangiocarcinoma after orthotopic liver transplantation—a case report

AIM: To report the use of radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of recurrenct cholangiocarcinoma in the transplanted liver.METHODS: A lady who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma recurrence of tumour 13 mo after tralsplantation inspite of adjuvant chemotherapy. Her recurrent tumour was treated with radiofrequency ablation.RESULTS: She survived for 18 mo following the recurrence of her tumour.CONCLUSION: Radiofrequency ablation can be used safely in the transplanted liver to treat recurrent tumour.

Early tacrolimus exposure does not impact long-term outcomes after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND Tacrolimus trough levels(TTL)during the first weeks after liver transplantation(LT)have been related with long-term renal function and hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence.Nevertheless,the significance of trough levels of tacrolimus during the early post-transplant period for the long-term outcome is under debate AIM To evaluate the effect of TTL during the first month on the long-term outcomes after LT.METHODS One hundred fifty-five LT recipients treated de novo with once-daily tacrolimus were retrospectively studied.Patients with repeated LT or combined transplantation were excluded as well as those who presented renal dysfunction prior to transplantation and/or those who needed induction therapy.Patients were classified into 2 groups according to their mean TTL within the first month after transplantation:≤10(n=98)and>10 ng/mL(n=57).Multivariate analyses were performed to assess risk factors for patient mortality.RESULTS Mean levels within the first month post-transplant were 7.4±1.7 and 12.6±2.2 ng/mL in the≤10 and>10 groups,respectively.Donor age was higher in the high TTL group 62.9±16.8 years vs 45.7±17.5 years(P=0.002)whilst mycophenolate-mofetil was more frequently used in the low TTL group 32.7%vs 15.8%(P=0.02).Recipient features were generally similar across groups.After a median follow-up of 52.8 mo(range 2.8-81.1),no significant differences were observed in:Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate(P=0.69),hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence(P=0.44),de novo tumors(P=0.77),new-onset diabetes(P=0.13),or biopsy-proven acute rejection rate(12.2%and 8.8%,respectively;P=0.50).Eighteen patients died during the follow-up and were evenly distributed across groups(P=0.83).Five-year patient survival was 90.5%and 84.9%,respectively(P=0.44),while 5-year graft survival was 88.2%and 80.8%,respectively(P=0.42).Early TTL was not an independent factor for patient mortality in multivariate analyses.CONCLUSION Differences in tacrolimus levels restricted to the first month after transplant did not result in significant differences in long-term outcomes of LT recipients.

Double cholecystectomy in case of accessory gallbladder:Not as easy as two cholecystectomies

To the Editor:Accessory gallbladders(AG)are rare and their management are usually challenging.These variations are related with an abnormal division of the bile ducts precursors between the 5th and the 12th week of pregnancy.Harlaftis et al.[1]proposed an anatomical classification of these variations based on the embryologic abnormalities described.In type 1 both gallbladders are connected to the common bile duct at the same location.In type 2 the AG can reach either the common bile duct(ductular type)or an intrahepatic biliary duct(trabecular type).In type 3,three gallbladders are present.

Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection for huge (≥10 cm) liver tumors: an international multicenter propensity-score matched cohort study of 799 cases

Background:The use of laparoscopic(LLR)and robotic liver resections(RLR)has been safely performed in many institutions for liver tumours.A large scale international multicenter study would provide stronger evidence and insight into application of these techniques for huge liver tumours≥10 cm.Methods:This was a retrospective review of 971 patients who underwent LLR and RLR for huge(≥10 cm)tumors at 42 international centers between 2002-2020.Results:One hundred RLR and 699 LLR which met study criteria were included.The comparison between the 2 approaches for patients with huge tumors were performed using 1:3 propensity-score matching(PSM)(73 vs.219).Before PSM,LLR was associated with significantly increased frequency of previous abdominal surgery,malignant pathology,liver cirrhosis and increased median blood.After PSM,RLR and LLR was associated with no significant difference in key perioperative outcomes including media operation time(242 vs.290 min,P=0.286),transfusion rate rate(19.2%vs.16.9%,P=0.652),median blood loss(200 vs.300 mL,P=0.694),open conversion rate(8.2%vs.11.0%,P=0.519),morbidity(28.8%vs.21.9%,P=0.221),major morbidity(4.1%vs.9.6%,P=0.152),mortality and postoperative length of stay(6 vs.6 days,P=0.435).Conclusions:RLR and LLR can be performed safely for selected patients with huge liver tumours with excellent outcomes.There was no significant difference in perioperative outcomes after RLR or LLR.