Objective: To study the seroprevalence of hepatitis B virus(HBV) and hepatitis delta virus(HDV) infections in patients visiting outpatient department of a major tertiary care hospital in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa region of P...Objective: To study the seroprevalence of hepatitis B virus(HBV) and hepatitis delta virus(HDV) infections in patients visiting outpatient department of a major tertiary care hospital in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa region of Pakistan.Methods: Blood samples were collected from non-hospitalized patients. Serological analysis was done by ELISA and viral DNA was amplified by PCR. The amplified DNA was analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis.Results: Altogether, 946 blood samples were screened, overall percentage of HBs Agpositive patients remained 22.41%(prevalence: 224.10/1 000; CI: 0.197 5 ± 0.250 7) with the highest incidence rates among relatively younger age groups(20–29 years). The prevalence of HBV–HDV co-infection was found to be 46.75/1 000; CI: 0.031 8 ± 0.061 7.In HBs Ag-positive patients, anti-HBc-total was detected in 86.79% while 25.00% were positive for anti-HBc-immunoglobulin M. Similarly, among these patients, HBV DNA was detected in 64.13% and 10.85% were co-infected with HDV. Different symptoms were associated with the prevailing infection, including malaise(62%), anorexia(66%) and fatigue(73%). The most commonly associated symptom was abdominal discomfort. Among these patients, certain risk factors, including surgery, visit to dentist and intravenus infusions were frequently associated with the infection(x^2= 95.23; df = 11; P < 0.000 1).Conclusions: Overall, this study confirmed higher prevalence of active HBV/HDV infection, among young patients from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa region having no prior history of viral hepatitis.展开更多
<strong>Background:</strong> Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a syndrome of chronically elevated glucose level in the blood either due to insulin resistance, insulin deficiency or both. In addition, it may occur ...<strong>Background:</strong> Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a syndrome of chronically elevated glucose level in the blood either due to insulin resistance, insulin deficiency or both. In addition, it may occur due to defective metabolism of carbohydrates, fats and proteins. There are 3 main types of DM: Type 2 DM is more prevalent in adults and is typically due to relative insulin deficiency, deficiency of insulin in children leads to DM type 1;and lastly, gestational diabetes occurs during pregnancy resulting from an imbalance of placental hormones. <strong>Introduction:</strong> Insulin, Biguanides and Sulfonylureas are some of the drug classes used to treat DM. However, their use is complicated by numerous side effects, such as;hypoglycemia & weight gain from insulin and sulfonylureas;lactic acidosis, vitamin B12 deficiency and gastrointestinal upset with metformin. Route of administration and cost are also important factors to consider when prescribing. It is for this reason the quest for newer, safer and easier to administer drugs is ongoing. <strong>Methodology:</strong> Used all the articles available on anti Diabetic drugs on web especially in British Medical Journal, Elsevier, Pubmed, Google scholar and Wikipedia etc. Got a final review article to compare the older and newer anti Diabetic drugs. <strong>Results and Conclusion:</strong> Insulin is good for controlling acute hyperglycemic states in DM but it causes acute hypoglycemia and lipodystrophy. Metformin is good hypoglycemic and easily available but causes hypoglycemia, metallic taste, Lactic acidosis and B12 deficiency. Sulfonylureas are good hypoglycemic but causes severe hypoglycemia acutely and weight gain so contraindicated for obese or hypertensive patients. While newer antidiabetics such as GLP 1 agonists increases insulin secretions has very low risk of hypoglycemia, causes weight loss as compared to insulin and decreases risk of cardiovascular side effects but still can’t be used in renally impaired patients, causes pancreatitis and can not be given in gastroparesis patients, similarly a newer drug of this class known as LY2189265 has long halflife of 90 hours, better efficacy, but causes pancreatitis and increase diastolic BP in high doses, pancreatitis is not associated with lixisenatide (GLP 1 agonist), while DPP4 inhibitors which increases GLP 1 in body has less risk of hypoglycemia, GI side effects, are weight neutral can be used in CKD but causes headaches and Nasopharyngitis. Bromocriptine or pegvisomant are used in patients of growth hormones adenoma induced DM as a medical therapy but are associated with psychosis and hallucinations. Meglitinides increases insulin secretion and has minuscule risk of hypoglycemia but can not be used in CKD patients. Otelixizumab and Teplizumab decrease T cell functions and save beta cells from immune reactions used in DM 1 but cause immune suppression and is an orphan drug. Recombinant GAD used in vaccines decreased antibody mediated beta cell damage but is still under studies.展开更多
AIM: To identify the current roles of eye and health care workers in eye care delivery and investigate their potential roles in screening and detection for management of diabetic retinopathy(DR) through task sharin...AIM: To identify the current roles of eye and health care workers in eye care delivery and investigate their potential roles in screening and detection for management of diabetic retinopathy(DR) through task sharing.METHODS: Purposive sampling of 24 participants including health administrators, members from non-government organizations and all available eye care workers in Takeo province were recruited. This cross sectional mixed method study comprised a survey and in-depth interviews. Data were collected from medical records at Caritas Takeo Eye Hospital(CTEH) and Kiri Vong District Referral Hospital Vision Centre, and a survey and interviews with participants were done to explore the potential roles for task sharing in DR management. Qualitative data were transcribed into a text program and then entered into N-Vivo(version 10) software for data management and analysis. RESULTS: From 2009 to 2012, a total of 105 178 patients were examined and 14 030 eye surgeries were performed in CTEH by three ophthalmologists supported by ophthalmic nurses in operating and eye examination for patients. Between January 2011 and September 2012, 151 patients(72 males) with retinal pathology including 125(83%) with DR visited CTEH. In addition 170 patients with diabetes were referred to CTEH for eye examinations from Mo Po Tsyo screening programs for people with diabetes. Factors favouring task sharing included high demand for eye care services and scarcity of ophthalmologists.CONCLUSION: Task sharing and team work for eye care services is functional. Participants favor the potential role of ophthalmic nurses in screening for DR through task sharing.展开更多
基金Partly supported by Higher Education Commission,Pakistan(IPFP.3782)internal research funds of Qauid-i-Azam University Islamabad
文摘Objective: To study the seroprevalence of hepatitis B virus(HBV) and hepatitis delta virus(HDV) infections in patients visiting outpatient department of a major tertiary care hospital in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa region of Pakistan.Methods: Blood samples were collected from non-hospitalized patients. Serological analysis was done by ELISA and viral DNA was amplified by PCR. The amplified DNA was analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis.Results: Altogether, 946 blood samples were screened, overall percentage of HBs Agpositive patients remained 22.41%(prevalence: 224.10/1 000; CI: 0.197 5 ± 0.250 7) with the highest incidence rates among relatively younger age groups(20–29 years). The prevalence of HBV–HDV co-infection was found to be 46.75/1 000; CI: 0.031 8 ± 0.061 7.In HBs Ag-positive patients, anti-HBc-total was detected in 86.79% while 25.00% were positive for anti-HBc-immunoglobulin M. Similarly, among these patients, HBV DNA was detected in 64.13% and 10.85% were co-infected with HDV. Different symptoms were associated with the prevailing infection, including malaise(62%), anorexia(66%) and fatigue(73%). The most commonly associated symptom was abdominal discomfort. Among these patients, certain risk factors, including surgery, visit to dentist and intravenus infusions were frequently associated with the infection(x^2= 95.23; df = 11; P < 0.000 1).Conclusions: Overall, this study confirmed higher prevalence of active HBV/HDV infection, among young patients from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa region having no prior history of viral hepatitis.
文摘<strong>Background:</strong> Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a syndrome of chronically elevated glucose level in the blood either due to insulin resistance, insulin deficiency or both. In addition, it may occur due to defective metabolism of carbohydrates, fats and proteins. There are 3 main types of DM: Type 2 DM is more prevalent in adults and is typically due to relative insulin deficiency, deficiency of insulin in children leads to DM type 1;and lastly, gestational diabetes occurs during pregnancy resulting from an imbalance of placental hormones. <strong>Introduction:</strong> Insulin, Biguanides and Sulfonylureas are some of the drug classes used to treat DM. However, their use is complicated by numerous side effects, such as;hypoglycemia & weight gain from insulin and sulfonylureas;lactic acidosis, vitamin B12 deficiency and gastrointestinal upset with metformin. Route of administration and cost are also important factors to consider when prescribing. It is for this reason the quest for newer, safer and easier to administer drugs is ongoing. <strong>Methodology:</strong> Used all the articles available on anti Diabetic drugs on web especially in British Medical Journal, Elsevier, Pubmed, Google scholar and Wikipedia etc. Got a final review article to compare the older and newer anti Diabetic drugs. <strong>Results and Conclusion:</strong> Insulin is good for controlling acute hyperglycemic states in DM but it causes acute hypoglycemia and lipodystrophy. Metformin is good hypoglycemic and easily available but causes hypoglycemia, metallic taste, Lactic acidosis and B12 deficiency. Sulfonylureas are good hypoglycemic but causes severe hypoglycemia acutely and weight gain so contraindicated for obese or hypertensive patients. While newer antidiabetics such as GLP 1 agonists increases insulin secretions has very low risk of hypoglycemia, causes weight loss as compared to insulin and decreases risk of cardiovascular side effects but still can’t be used in renally impaired patients, causes pancreatitis and can not be given in gastroparesis patients, similarly a newer drug of this class known as LY2189265 has long halflife of 90 hours, better efficacy, but causes pancreatitis and increase diastolic BP in high doses, pancreatitis is not associated with lixisenatide (GLP 1 agonist), while DPP4 inhibitors which increases GLP 1 in body has less risk of hypoglycemia, GI side effects, are weight neutral can be used in CKD but causes headaches and Nasopharyngitis. Bromocriptine or pegvisomant are used in patients of growth hormones adenoma induced DM as a medical therapy but are associated with psychosis and hallucinations. Meglitinides increases insulin secretion and has minuscule risk of hypoglycemia but can not be used in CKD patients. Otelixizumab and Teplizumab decrease T cell functions and save beta cells from immune reactions used in DM 1 but cause immune suppression and is an orphan drug. Recombinant GAD used in vaccines decreased antibody mediated beta cell damage but is still under studies.
基金Supported by the Centre for Eye Research Austral(CERA),Royal Victorian Eye&Ear Hospital,MelbourneCERA receives Operational Infrastructure Support from the Victorian Government
文摘AIM: To identify the current roles of eye and health care workers in eye care delivery and investigate their potential roles in screening and detection for management of diabetic retinopathy(DR) through task sharing.METHODS: Purposive sampling of 24 participants including health administrators, members from non-government organizations and all available eye care workers in Takeo province were recruited. This cross sectional mixed method study comprised a survey and in-depth interviews. Data were collected from medical records at Caritas Takeo Eye Hospital(CTEH) and Kiri Vong District Referral Hospital Vision Centre, and a survey and interviews with participants were done to explore the potential roles for task sharing in DR management. Qualitative data were transcribed into a text program and then entered into N-Vivo(version 10) software for data management and analysis. RESULTS: From 2009 to 2012, a total of 105 178 patients were examined and 14 030 eye surgeries were performed in CTEH by three ophthalmologists supported by ophthalmic nurses in operating and eye examination for patients. Between January 2011 and September 2012, 151 patients(72 males) with retinal pathology including 125(83%) with DR visited CTEH. In addition 170 patients with diabetes were referred to CTEH for eye examinations from Mo Po Tsyo screening programs for people with diabetes. Factors favouring task sharing included high demand for eye care services and scarcity of ophthalmologists.CONCLUSION: Task sharing and team work for eye care services is functional. Participants favor the potential role of ophthalmic nurses in screening for DR through task sharing.