Background:In the context of a growing appreciation for the wellbeing of the health workforce as the foundation of high-quality,sustainable health systems,this paper presents findings from two complementary studies to...Background:In the context of a growing appreciation for the wellbeing of the health workforce as the foundation of high-quality,sustainable health systems,this paper presents findings from two complementary studies to explore occupational stress and professional quality of life among health workers that were conducted in preparation for a task-shifting intervention to improve antenatal mental health services in Cape Town.Methods:This mixed-methods,cross-sectional study was conducted in public sector Midwife Obstetric Units and associated Non-Profit Organisations in Cape Town.Semi-structured interviews and a quantitative survey were conducted among facility-and community-based professional and lay health workers.The survey included demographic as well as effort-reward imbalance(ERI)and professional quality of life(PROQOL)questionnaires to examine overall levels of work-related psychosocial stress and professional quality of life,as well as differences between lay and professional health workers.Qualitative data was analysed using a thematic content analysis approach.Quantitative data was analysed using STATA 12.Results:Findings from 37 qualitative interviews highlighted the difficult working conditions and often limited reward and support structures experienced by health workers.Corroborating these findings,our quantitative survey of 165 professional and lay health workers revealed that most health workers experienced a mismatch between efforts spent and rewards gained at work(61.1%of professional and 70.2%of lay health workers;p=0.302).There were few statistically significant differences in ERI and PROQOL scores between professional and lay health workers.Although Compassion Satisfaction was high for all health worker groups,lay health workers also showed elevated levels of burnout and compassion fatigue,with community-based health workers particularly affected.Conclusions:Findings of this study add to the existing evidence base on adverse working conditions faced by South African public-sector health workers that should be taken into consideration as national and local governments seek to‘re-engineer’South Africa’s Primary Health Care system.Furthermore,they also highlight the importance of taking into consideration the wellbeing of health workers themselves to develop interventions that can sustainably foster resilient and high-quality health systems.展开更多
One of the most important points in the meta-analyses is certainly represented by the assessment of the quality of the studies included in such research. The meta-analyses are considered the highest level of evidence ...One of the most important points in the meta-analyses is certainly represented by the assessment of the quality of the studies included in such research. The meta-analyses are considered the highest level of evidence in science. Also for this reason, the quality of the studies included should be accurately evaluated by standardized tools. The overall results of the metaanalysis depend indeed also on a rigorous evaluation of the studies quality. Among all the possible tools for this complex evaluation, the Newcastle Ottawa Scale(NOS) is one of the most used worldwide, above all for observational studies. In this review, we will discuss the strengths and limitation of the NOS, also on the basis of the branch of science in which it has been applied.展开更多
基金funded by the National Institute for Health Research(NIHR)Global Health Research Unit on Health System Strengthening in Sub-Saharan Africa,King’s College London(GHRU 16/136/54)using UK aid from the UK Government to support global health research。
文摘Background:In the context of a growing appreciation for the wellbeing of the health workforce as the foundation of high-quality,sustainable health systems,this paper presents findings from two complementary studies to explore occupational stress and professional quality of life among health workers that were conducted in preparation for a task-shifting intervention to improve antenatal mental health services in Cape Town.Methods:This mixed-methods,cross-sectional study was conducted in public sector Midwife Obstetric Units and associated Non-Profit Organisations in Cape Town.Semi-structured interviews and a quantitative survey were conducted among facility-and community-based professional and lay health workers.The survey included demographic as well as effort-reward imbalance(ERI)and professional quality of life(PROQOL)questionnaires to examine overall levels of work-related psychosocial stress and professional quality of life,as well as differences between lay and professional health workers.Qualitative data was analysed using a thematic content analysis approach.Quantitative data was analysed using STATA 12.Results:Findings from 37 qualitative interviews highlighted the difficult working conditions and often limited reward and support structures experienced by health workers.Corroborating these findings,our quantitative survey of 165 professional and lay health workers revealed that most health workers experienced a mismatch between efforts spent and rewards gained at work(61.1%of professional and 70.2%of lay health workers;p=0.302).There were few statistically significant differences in ERI and PROQOL scores between professional and lay health workers.Although Compassion Satisfaction was high for all health worker groups,lay health workers also showed elevated levels of burnout and compassion fatigue,with community-based health workers particularly affected.Conclusions:Findings of this study add to the existing evidence base on adverse working conditions faced by South African public-sector health workers that should be taken into consideration as national and local governments seek to‘re-engineer’South Africa’s Primary Health Care system.Furthermore,they also highlight the importance of taking into consideration the wellbeing of health workers themselves to develop interventions that can sustainably foster resilient and high-quality health systems.
文摘One of the most important points in the meta-analyses is certainly represented by the assessment of the quality of the studies included in such research. The meta-analyses are considered the highest level of evidence in science. Also for this reason, the quality of the studies included should be accurately evaluated by standardized tools. The overall results of the metaanalysis depend indeed also on a rigorous evaluation of the studies quality. Among all the possible tools for this complex evaluation, the Newcastle Ottawa Scale(NOS) is one of the most used worldwide, above all for observational studies. In this review, we will discuss the strengths and limitation of the NOS, also on the basis of the branch of science in which it has been applied.
