Comparison of the Incidence of Complications among the Different Techniques of Laparoscopic Approach: Experience in a General Surgery Service in a Private Hospital

Introduction: At least four techniques or approaches to minimize the risk of injury have been introduced. The correlation between techniques and the complication rate is controversial. The objective of the study is to report the incidence of laparoscopic entry associated injury, in relation to the used technique. Material and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at the Hospital Espa? ol, in a 12-month period (2013). The medical records of all patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery were reviewed. Demographic and surgical variables were analyzed, comparing the results statistically through an analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: A total of 792 cases were analyzed. The surgeries performed were: cholecystectomies (42%), appendectomies (26%), diagnostic laparoscopies (20%), ventral or inguinal hernioplasty (9%) and fundoplications (3%). The preferred approach was Hasson’s (79%) and Veres’s needle technique (14%), followed by classic closed (14%) and Palmer technique (2%). We documented six cases of laparoscopic entry associated injury (0.76%), four associated with the Hasson technique, one with Veress’s needle technique and one with direct approach technique were reported. The statistical analysis was performed considering the different techniques and their relation with the injuries. Analysis of variance did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.31). Conclusions: Among our data, the number of laparoscopic entry associated injuries, was less than 1%, and has a similar frequency to the reported literature. We did not find significant differences between the four laparoscopic entry techniques. There remains no clear evidence as to the optimal form of laparoscopic entry in the low-risk patient.

A novel mortality risk score for emphysematous pyelonephritis:A multicenter study of the Global Research in the Emphysematous Pyelonephritis group

Background:Emphysematous pyelonephritis(EPN)is a necrotizing infection of the kidney and the surrounding tissues associated with considerable mortality.We aimed to formulate a score that classifies the risk of mortality in patients with EPN at hospital admission.Materials and methods:Patients diagnosed with EPN between 2013 and 2020 were retrospectively included.Data from 15 centers(70%)were used to develop the scoring system,and data from 7 centers(30%)were used to validate it.Univariable and mułtivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent factors related to mortality.Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to construct the sconng system and calculate the risk of mortality.A standardized regression coefficient was used to quantify the discriminating power of each factor to convert the individual coefficients into points.The area under the curve was used to quantify the scoring system performance.An 8-point scoring system for the mortality risk was created(range,0-7).Results:In total,570 patients were included(400 in the test group and 170 in the validation group).Independent predictors of mortality in the multivariable logistic regression were included in the scoring system:quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment score≥2(2 points),anemia,paranephric gas extension,leukocyte count>22,000/pL,thrombocytopenia,and hyperglycemia(1 point each).The mortality rate was<5%for scores≤3,83.3%for scores 6,and 100%for scores 7.The area under the Curve was 0.90(95%confidence interval,0.84-0.95)for test and 0.91(95%confidence interval,0.84-0.97)for the validation group.Condusions:Our score predicts the risk of mortality in patients with EPN at presentation and may help clinicians identify patients at a higher risk of death.